or Connect
Mothering › Mothering Forums › Pregnancy and Birth › Understanding Circumcision › Responses to Playboy's pro-intact stance
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Responses to Playboy's pro-intact stance - Page 3

post #41 of 47
Quote:
Originally Posted by Revamp
Actually strangely enough they are not so fond of that look any more, they tend to aim for medium sized women with breasts which do not look like they have had bicycle pumps affixed to the nipples and inflated.

Or...Um...At least, so I am informed...I watched a documentary on it. For social studies purposes. Obviously.

Moving on...

Yay for Playboy! And, apparently, yay for Hustler as well! I am very glad to hear this, I could imagine this having some impact.
That's nice on all fronts. America must learn to appreciate sexuality au naturelle like the Europeans do. That means without cosmetic surgeries galore. I find natural breasts waaay more attractive even if they're medium than gigantic silicone breasts. So maybe these mags will sway popular opinion a bit until like Europe, people believe in natural breasts as well as a natural penis (not cut up at all!!!).
post #42 of 47
I have only read about half this thread, but wanted to respond about Playgirl.

I have a quick link to their "Daily Fix" online page. It's just a different photo every day of a man. Every single time the man is intact, they have him positioned with his fingers straddling his pubic fat pad area pulling the skin back towards his groin, effectively giving him a circumcised look. It's terribly disappointing.
post #43 of 47
Most liquor stores carry Playboy as well as some bookstores (Waldens I think)

Kinda OT do most of you cosider playboy porn?
post #44 of 47
Yes, as its content is intended to arouse.
post #45 of 47
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fi.
Borders sells them. Lots of gas stations do too - I saw them at Sheetz.

Everytime the whole Playboy thing comes up, everyone seems to forget Hustler which took this stance and published a very blatant anti-circ ARTICLE in 1979. Where's the props for them?
Oh, Sheetz! I need to move back to PA!
post #46 of 47
Quote:
Originally Posted by ared1
Kinda OT do most of you cosider playboy porn?
I'll bite this loaded question! Well, yes, Playboy is porn but I personally don't believe that all porn is uh, whats the word? BAD? Morally wrong? Evil?

Playboy is pretty 'soft' and also respectful, I think. Of women, of different gender relationships (GTLB), sexual choices, and also does a lot of social commentary. While the women often look a little plastic, that is certainly the standard of beauty these days. I am not bothered by the women (they are consenting adults and they are paid and it's their choice) and I have always liked the reporting and fiction pieces.

We subscribed for a long time, but don't currently; I'm trying to cut down on some 'extras'.

I was happy to stumble on this thread! We need more pro-intact publicity.
post #47 of 47


Thats great about playboys stance on not circing. I'll deff have to check the article out when dh gets his new issue in the mail* he has a sub to it*

New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Understanding Circumcision
Mothering › Mothering Forums › Pregnancy and Birth › Understanding Circumcision › Responses to Playboy's pro-intact stance