Aside from the reasons already posted, I really prefer classic toys for my son because they require him to use his imagination more and they capture his attention much longer. And all the classics you can usually find in wooden form, so that's what I get. Plus, it seems like 95% of the plastic toys out there need batteries and light up and make noise. There are even shape-sorters and ring stackers that take batteries. Weren't the original designs good enough? Ugh. I hate them. My son doesn't really care for them either.
I'm not against little people, play laptops, or battery-operated toys completely, but my goodness, it's gotten out of control in this country. We have a butt-load of those toys mostly from friends and family, but they are hidden in my sewing room until I can get rid of them, and I let DS have ONE at a time in his room. Right now, he has an elmo guitar. He really only plays with it when he accidently steps on it and it makes noise and gets his attention. But he plays with it for 2 minutes and moves on. Just watching my neice and my son play with an assortment of toys, I can tell what's really fun for them and what is just mezmorizing for a moment. The plastic electronic stuff doesn't do anything for them but grab their attention for a split second. But they'll stack blocks for 30 minutes.
Anyways I'm rambling. I'm not completely against those types of toys, I just feel if you can buy a more natural, not-so-flashy version of the popular toy, why not? Kids don't need every single toy to *do* something ya know?
We're also lego fans. My parents wouldn't buy legos when I was a kid and it was always that forbidden toy that I always wanted sooo badly.

Ds is to little for regular legos, but we have a huge set of mega blocks with a dump truck. He plays with them every. single. day. I'm always picking those darn things up. Which is why my parents refused to buy them. Thank goodness I can get over that.
