Aren't we all tired of hearing THAT one? It seriously squicks me out. It is downright creepy for a parent to care so much about the cosmetic appearance of their own child's most private, sexual parts that they request surgical alteration to suite their own culturally-conditioned preferrences...
Cosmetically-motivated circumcision violently imposes a parent's culturally-conditioned sexual preferrence on a perfectly normal, healthy non-consenting child. It is an blatantly inappropriate breach of appropriate parental boundaries, respect, and trust. Circumcision externalizes the glans, which is designed to only be exposed during an erection; it makes the penis of a baby permantly look like the penis of an aroused, natural man. A baby's first sexual experience shouldn't be of having his penis stretched, torn, crushed, and cut. Circumcising a baby because you think a cut penis looks better is not love; it's arrogance. You will never be having sex with your son; what you prefer should have no bearing whatsoever on which parts of your son's sexual anatomy he gets to keep, and which end up in a medical waste incinerator. Vaginal rejuvination, clitoral hood removal, labiaplasty, and breast implants are popular cosmetic alterations requested by adult women; these women believe it will improve the appearance of their genitals. Would these alterations be a ethical thing to do to a female infant or child?
Circumcision is a very personal choice---HIS.
/rant
Sorry, at the end of the day yesterday, as we were closing up the booth a very argumentative man came by advocating circumcision on cosmetic reasons alone. It just irks me to no end.
Jen
Cosmetically-motivated circumcision violently imposes a parent's culturally-conditioned sexual preferrence on a perfectly normal, healthy non-consenting child. It is an blatantly inappropriate breach of appropriate parental boundaries, respect, and trust. Circumcision externalizes the glans, which is designed to only be exposed during an erection; it makes the penis of a baby permantly look like the penis of an aroused, natural man. A baby's first sexual experience shouldn't be of having his penis stretched, torn, crushed, and cut. Circumcising a baby because you think a cut penis looks better is not love; it's arrogance. You will never be having sex with your son; what you prefer should have no bearing whatsoever on which parts of your son's sexual anatomy he gets to keep, and which end up in a medical waste incinerator. Vaginal rejuvination, clitoral hood removal, labiaplasty, and breast implants are popular cosmetic alterations requested by adult women; these women believe it will improve the appearance of their genitals. Would these alterations be a ethical thing to do to a female infant or child?
Circumcision is a very personal choice---HIS.
/rant
Sorry, at the end of the day yesterday, as we were closing up the booth a very argumentative man came by advocating circumcision on cosmetic reasons alone. It just irks me to no end.
Jen








:


) and I agree that it's offensive when people say that intact is disgusting... my dh's penis is NOT disgusting in any way
: It boggles my mind that some women want their son's penises to be attractive to them... that really smacks of incest. I don't think they think of it that way, but it really comes across like that.
[/rant]