Mothering › Forums › Health › The Case Against Circumcision › Circ as a MEN's issue?
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Circ as a MEN's issue?  

post #1 of 26
Thread Starter 
You know, I just don't think anything will change in this country until men decide that this is a men's issue and take it upon themselves to call attention to the needless mutilation of our sons.

Yes, I know it is a HUMAN rights issue, but mainstream America doesn't see it that way. "Since most circumcized men don't seem to care about what happend to them, it can't possibly be that bad, can it?"

If men don't get over the fact that they were wronged as an infant and insist that all men get the right to decide the fate of their own foreskin, things around here will never change.

Like the woman who lets her daughter get abused because she herself was abused...the cycle of violence against boys needs to end and men need to lead the way.

I'm tired of hearing about how I don't have a penis so what the hell would I know about it anyway.
post #2 of 26
Obviously, there are many men who are completely opposed to circumcision, but for most men, there are some issues that crop up. These are my theories/ramblings on this issue.

Men have a need to believe that their penis is great, that they are great lovers, etc - essentially that their sexuality is 110% at all times. To suggest anything less is a blow to the man's pride. Suggesting that circumcision is negative is the same as suggesting that the man is inadequate sexually. When one of these men has his son circumcised, the same thought process is at play. The man thinks, "My penis IS perfect and I'm an excellent lover, so I'm doing my son a favor by getting him circumcised." If the man were to confront circumcision honestly with regards to his son, he would be admitting that his own sexuality might not be what it should be. It takes a big man to stand up and say that his sexuality is inadequate and that it isn't his fault.

And it does take a big man to stand up and admit he is a victim. American society deems male victims as sissies and no man wants to be called a sissy. So instead of admiting he is a victim of greedy doctors, masturbation obsessed Victorians, and bad advice, the American man celebrates his mutilated genitals and makes them a point of pride. And, of course, this hidden shame gets passed to the children.

All in all, its a very hard issue for men to bring up as anything but a fake point of pride.
post #3 of 26
ugh, its a vicious cycle, isn't it? until men are able to swallow their pride when presented with the facts, then circing will never be considered a men's issue.
post #4 of 26
:

waits for Acksiom to post his $100k

heheheh
post #5 of 26
I see circumcision as a men's issue, I have done since the very start of my interest in it.

I blame Andrew Sullivan: he is, as far as I know, unique in being a pundit based, writing for and about and read primarily by Americans and yet willing to take a firmly hard-line anti-circumcision stance. This has gained him much derision in certain (almost certainly circumcised) areas of the Blogosphere but I respect him for it, even if he seems to have gone flannelish over the entire HIV/AIDS/Africa thing.

He wrote an article asking whether if girls were the ones being cut up for such scanty reasons this would be permitted to continue. It is, to my mind, one of the soundest and most immediately answerable rhetorical questions ever to have been posed.

So why this exclusive, major defiance of male sovereignty and liberty then?

Due to inequality.

I have, in one form or another whether I knew of the moniker or not, been an intactivist ever since.
post #6 of 26
Christifav, I think you are absolutely right, and it totaly amazes me that more men (actualy all circumcised men) are not totaly incensed that they were butchered as babies. I was 6 when I discovered what my mother had allowed to happen to me and my emotions went from curious, to wishing it had never happened, to being really angry about it. The sad thing is that I know my mother always did her best for her children and thought she was doing the right thing. She just got really bad advice.

Sammyjr, your explanation is one that I have seen many times , and I'm sure you hit the nail on the head. However I have great difficulty wrapping my head around the idea that for all those circumcised and "happy" men out there , their "ego" over rules simple logic. I know that is what is taking place, but it just does not make sense (to me anyway).

So, yes , if more men would see this barbaric custom for what it is , I'm sure it would end up in the anals of history as a "they did what ?!?!?!" kind of thing very quickly.
post #7 of 26
Quote:
Originally Posted by mika85 View Post
ugh, its a vicious cycle, isn't it? until men are able to swallow their pride when presented with the facts, then circing will never be considered a men's issue.
I don't think able is the proper word in your statement but allowed.

Men are not allowed to grieve or be hurt by this issue. See peoples reaction to men that do complain and speak out. They are belittled and berated. Told to get over it. They are shamed for not liking circumcission. They are having to tell their parents that their parents did something wrong. The men I have known or read that has tried to discuss it with their parents are quickly shot down. Our society does this to them, not just men not just women.

Making it just a man's issue denies/ignores the negative impact on women and our total society. My husband's circumcission not only effects him but it effects me so it is just as much my issue as his. Making it just a man's issue denies the responcibliety women have to keeping their children whole. In most cases if a mom wants the baby done it is done even if dad objects.

*********
On a side and sad note....I think week heard a lady, a mother, state you have to beat your boy to make him strong. Like she cut him to make him strong and perfect. He learns how to be a man by not only men but the women that are raising him and beating him to be strong. Being able to beat someone is being strong is the message women are sending him, not men because there is no longer any in his life.

I think we forget how we affect the total out come in our children. How we as women treat our sons that turn them into men, good and bad. Our female expectation in/for a man makes what our daughters get.

Whose issue is this.......it should be all of ours not just men.
post #8 of 26
SammyJr,

I wish I could quote your signature. That is awesome
post #9 of 26
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marsupialmom View Post
Making it just a man's issue denies/ignores the negative impact on women and our total society. My husband's circumcission not only effects him but it effects me so it is just as much my issue as his. Making it just a man's issue denies the responcibliety women have to keeping their children whole.

Whose issue is this.......it should be all of ours not just men.
Absolutely...it SHOULD be an issue for all human beings. I mourn every day for my husband's lost foreskin and that I will never know sex the way nature intended it.

I just don't think mainstream moms out there are listening to woman intactivists. (Not that I have a whole heck of a lot of experience, as I'm only a brand-new intactivist myself)

I think more mothers would pay attention if it were the MEN who were bringing this issue to light. It is far more personal when a man says, "here is what happend to me and how it has affected me". When a woman says, "my husband went through this" or "my sex life/marriage has been affected by it" it is much more of an abstract idea.

I agree, too, that society puts extra pressure on men to be "tough" and not complain. That's crappy and adds to the challenges intactivists face.

I'm sorry I'm not more eloquent.
post #10 of 26
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marsupialmom View Post
Men are not allowed to grieve or be hurt by this issue. See peoples reaction to men that do complain and speak out. They are belittled and berated. Told to get over it. They are shamed for not liking circumcission. They are having to tell their parents that their parents did something wrong. The men I have known or read that has tried to discuss it with their parents are quickly shot down. Our society does this to them, not just men not just women.
This has been my experience, exactly. Over the course of several conversations, I have tried to explain to my parents why I hated being circumcised and why my son is intact. In each case, it always ends up with remarks like, "I don't see the problem." or "Well, you still can have sex, right?" There was no consideration of my feelings and no thought that they might have made a mistake, just the usual American cultural baggage.

Quote:
Originally Posted by christifav View Post
I think more mothers would pay attention if it were the MEN who were bringing this issue to light. It is far more personal when a man says, "here is what happend to me and how it has affected me". When a woman says, "my husband went through this" or "my sex life/marriage has been affected by it" it is much more of an abstract idea.

I agree, too, that society puts extra pressure on men to be "tough" and not complain. That's crappy and adds to the challenges intactivists face.
What I said regarding my parents applies to society as well. If you try to explain your personal dislike of circumcision, people look at you like you have two heads and label you a loon. Men simply aren't allowed to complain - if they do, if falls on deaf ears. This is why "Well, my husband has the penis" is such a copout - even if the husband did have issues with circumcision, its hard to break through the societal and ego barriers and discuss those issues. The wife might even shame the husband for having such thoughts.

I believe that a big reason why a lot of anti-circumcision advocacy fails is due to a male's expectations in society, as we have discussed in this thread. A wife is going to turn to her husband and ask him, "Is being circumcised so bad?" and the husband's ego will answer, "No, I love being circumcised." and all the intactivist's efforts are shot.
post #11 of 26
I went to the Genital Integrity Symposium in Seattle last month. At least half the speakers were male. At least half the audience was male. Men ARE involved in this movement, too.
post #12 of 26
Why do parents who consider they are 'fully informed' a mom of a child to be born a 'boy gives a 'cop out ' to their dh because they don't own a 'penis' but they 'never 'research' and a circ dh cop out leads to their 'future son being 'circ' and I think all 'parents should 'read up' on circumcision & foreskin or otherwise they 'will never know the 'full truth' unless they had 'been fully 'around the truth'.

I know how it is to not to know 'anything different' from growing up into a circed tradition raised family the only 'foreskin(s) in my life I ever 'saw' is my ex and my son which are only 2 males and I didn't even learn a 'foreskin' existed' til i was 25 I think.

How can a 'dad and mom teach their kids of what a 'true circumcision is and what a 'true foreskin is when their circ beliefs could be a reundant snip of extra skin and when their is 'no foreskin' how 'can parents 'teach their son's and daughters if their never 'been any foreskin 'in peers and family.

Even medical books made america style are so inaccurate when it comes to circumcision & foreskin.

I just so glad I got to see the 'truth' of both sides.
post #13 of 26
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by A&A View Post
I went to the Genital Integrity Symposium in Seattle last month. At least half the speakers were male. At least half the audience was male. Men ARE involved in this movement, too.
I'm glad to hear that. I wish I could have been there.
post #14 of 26
I've expressed my anger/disappointment/annoyance at dh's parents, not to them, but to dh. His take on it was that, yes, it wasn't right for them to do it, but they didn't know better and probably weren't even asked, so why should he be mad at them? He completely agrees that cutting babies is at the very least useless and at the other end actually harmful, but he isn't mad about something he can't undo. He has made brief little comments about his mid life crisis including restoring, but he may have been joking, and I don't want to bring it up too often.

In general, he doesn't get mad about stuff he can't change, so him not being mad about this fact of his life is completely within his personality. He doesn't deny that it possibly hurt his sexuality, he calls circumcision "genital reduction surgery", he expresses disbelief about the whys of people still doing it, but he doesn't harbor resentment that it was done to him.

I wish he would. I do.
post #15 of 26
ITA. Would it also help if intact men came forward and talked about how grateful they are to their parents for leaving the decision up to them and how much they enjoy having their foreskin and how they haven't heard any complaints about hygiene from anyone they've been with? Because I think that's important also. The fact that these men weren't circumcised and are HAPPY about it could convince folks that the "fitting in" and "matching daddy" arguments really aren't that important (to their son at least....). FIL is circumcised and dh isn't and dh is so glad that he doesn't match fil

love and peace.
post #16 of 26
Quote:
Originally Posted by trmpetplaya View Post
ITA. Would it also help if intact men came forward and talked about how grateful they are to their parents for leaving the decision up to them and how much they enjoy having their foreskin
I try and mention that as often as possible when it comes to this issue...
post #17 of 26
I think most men take great pride in your penis. I think they should definately stand up and say no more circumcision, but at the same time, they don't want to admit that they've been "mutilated, abused, molested, damaged, etc." They don't want to think that their penis is inferior, and I bet it hurts to see other people say that about their penis. So, in order for them to say circumcision is wrong, about 50% of the male population has to say that they've been wronged. I think women are very important in this fight because we want the best for our sons and are the ones asked if we want to circumcise them or not. I don't want that choice taken away from me as long as there is a choice. Otherwise, I'm afraid the wrong decision would be made. KWIM?
post #18 of 26
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by JeDeeLenae View Post
I don't want that choice taken away from me as long as there is a choice. Otherwise, I'm afraid the wrong decision would be made. KWIM?
I'm not saying the choice should be taken away from moms, I just think more moms would listen to grown men talk about their penises than other women talking about their own sons or husbands.

Ultimately, the choice belongs to the owner of the penis, and I think all of us here agree on that.
post #19 of 26
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pandora114 View Post
:

waits for Acksiom to post his $100k

heheheh
LOL! Actually, though, other people have been doing fine pointing out the differences, and the importance thereby, in how one can frame this particular aspect.

Conceptually we do in general tend to more assign the active responsible role to men than to women, and as a result discussions like this tend to characterize things more as "Men need to do X" than "Men need X to get done" -- please note the difference there between the active and the passive voices.

And there is an important practical difference to that; "Men need X to get done" is MUCH more likely to motivate women than "Men need to do X".

But, it's different in here, which is one of the reasons I stick around: other people have addressed that difference already, albeit not specifically.

Also, most of what I have to say I already said in coloradoalice's thread "Why"??? -- http://www.mothering.com/discussions...d.php?t=529619 .

Not to mention I'm howlingly busy right now.

I will add one other point though: this whole thing about men investing huge amounts of ego and pride in their penis is just another sociological urban legend, like that whole "fear of committment" nonsense.

sidebar: the vast majority of men don't fear committment; what they fear is failure, as in I desperately fear failing to provide for my wife and children. Men are taught almost from birth that they are far more human doings than human beings, and this lesson is reinforced in them throughout life by their consistent observation of how their female peers are not only less severely punished for being bad, but their fellow males and they themselves are more severely punished just for failing to be good enough, as well.

Anyways. Most men by far invest far more ego and pride in their sports equipment or cars or homes or even their muscles and general physical conditioning than they do in their penises. I mean, think about it. Do we buy handcrafted sheepskin protective covers to put on our penises (no, condoms do not count), or polish them with wax (no, lube doesn't count either), or invest thousands of dollars and hours of labor building additions onto them (stop snickering, you in the back there; very few men actually get penile extension surgery, and are almost always far more figures of pity than amusement). I very much doubt even bodybuilders spend anywhere near as much time and effort, proportionately speaking, on kegel exercises.

Yes, all right, we can interpret just about anything in life sexually, but let's be serious for a moment here: do the men you know really spend that much time and focus on their penises -- in comparison to their hobbys and other interests?

Come on, you know that they don't. It doesn't even begin to approach coming close.

We guys don't like to admit to problems with our penises because we don't much like to admit to any physical incapacities at all; we don't like that in turn because it raises in the backs of our minds the awful spectre of failure, which we are taught to fear from infancy onwards.

It's the same thing that is behind our common reluctance to go to the doctor and to take care of our health overall; we're terrified, even if aconsciously, of even just considering the possibility that we might be incapacitated, because all our lives we're taught that love and affection and support and even just the mere acknowledgment of our existence is hugely dependent upon our ability to perform and succeed.

Men go to where the love comes from, and they follow it wherever it leads.

Even when that means over a cliff, like lemmings.



Case in point: I didn't really have the time to write all this, but Pandora singled me out by name and with anticipatory praise, and I, like one of Pavlov's dogs, got right up and trotted towards the siren stimulus of Performance = Reward! Performance = Reward!
post #20 of 26
Quote:
Originally Posted by christifav View Post
I'm not saying the choice should be taken away from moms, I just think more moms would listen to grown men talk about their penises than other women talking about their own sons or husbands.

Ultimately, the choice belongs to the owner of the penis, and I think all of us here agree on that.
I disagree.....women have a tendency to belittle men's parenting decision. If men do it differently it is wrong. If you look how men are shown in the media as fathers it is usually as them being ignorant and needing help of women. Leave it to Beaver days as dad's being knowledgeable are long gone. Which leads over to women's attitudes.

I have heard women laugh and belittle their baby's father for doing stuff like using Ziploc bags instead of the Playtex bags for those types of bottles. I personally don't see a big deal and have done the same thing in desperation for other peoples kids because I didn't have any bottle feeding stuff. I have heard them ridicule a baby's daddy because he used a straw to feed his sick 6mth old (umm my grandmother use to do that as a nurse and I have seen breast feeding mom's do the same thing). Ridicule for using paper towels to cover the diaper changing table becuase he forgot the diaper changing pad (why does it matter?).
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: The Case Against Circumcision
This thread is locked  
Mothering › Forums › Health › The Case Against Circumcision › Circ as a MEN's issue?