You're welcome. Your enthusiasm is contagious. Thanks for starting this thread. 
Yes 
I think it's better to rally people from within each state to write letters. Politicians generally pay more attention to input from the people who can vote them in or out of office. They pay less attention to letters from people living outside of their district and even less attention to letters from people living in other states.
Letters to your own state representative and state senator will have the most impact. Contact information for state representatives and state senators is usually listed in the front of the phone book. Also the web sites of most state legislatures have a page to help voters find the names and addresses of the legislators for their district.
In my opinion the important points to include in a letter are:
(1) Medicaid should only pay for medically necessary procedures.
(2) Infant circumcision is not medically necessary according to national and international professional medical organizations, including the American Academy of Pediatrics and the American Medical Association.
(3) Ask your legislator to end Medicaid funding of non-therapeutic circumcision.
You might also mention Medicaid in 16 states does not pay for unnecessary circumcisions. Those states are: Arizona, California, Florida, Idaho, Louisiana, Maine, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nevada, North Carolina, North Dakota, Oregon, Utah, and Washington.
If anyone has questions or wants more information about ending Medicaid payments for unnecessary circumcision, please feel free contact me by PM or email.
Jeff
Quote:
| Would you be willing to share some advice here? |

Quote:
| Is it helpful to have people from out of state writing letters to a given state, or is it better to rally people from within the specific state we work on? |
Letters to your own state representative and state senator will have the most impact. Contact information for state representatives and state senators is usually listed in the front of the phone book. Also the web sites of most state legislatures have a page to help voters find the names and addresses of the legislators for their district.
In my opinion the important points to include in a letter are:
(1) Medicaid should only pay for medically necessary procedures.
(2) Infant circumcision is not medically necessary according to national and international professional medical organizations, including the American Academy of Pediatrics and the American Medical Association.
(3) Ask your legislator to end Medicaid funding of non-therapeutic circumcision.
You might also mention Medicaid in 16 states does not pay for unnecessary circumcisions. Those states are: Arizona, California, Florida, Idaho, Louisiana, Maine, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nevada, North Carolina, North Dakota, Oregon, Utah, and Washington.
If anyone has questions or wants more information about ending Medicaid payments for unnecessary circumcision, please feel free contact me by PM or email.
Jeff













