Quote:
Originally Posted by zinemama 
I've heard all this before, and as a dedicated bjorn user whose kids are now 3 and 6, (with no hip/leg problems whatsoever), I really have to say: I think that you'd have to be carrying your kid around for some humongous amount of time for any sort of damage to occur. That is, if this is even true.
The bjorn was the only carrier (beside the Tough Traveler backpack) that really felt comfy for me. And easy and speedy to put on! Didn't work for my husband, so I certainly understand that it's not best for everyone. But I would never rule it out or tell someone not to try it because of - to my knowledge, anyway, and I may be wrong - unsubstantiated rumors.
Also, not that this pertains to this thread in particular...but has anyone noticed that crunchy mamas seem down on the bjorn in general? (And not for this reason). That there seems to be this attitude that "mainstream" people use that yuppie, trendy bjorn, so we can't possibly approve of it? Not when we can use a sling made from Guatemalan fabric!
I don't know. That's the vibe I get.
|
Just FYI, most mama's here DO wear their babies for most of the day. From about 2 weeks-8 months I was wearing my dd for at lest 5 hours a day. So yes, in that instance, I think a Bjiorn would be very harmful to my childs rapidly growing spine, hips and ligaments.
I would suggest you check out some of the information in the babywearing forum

Edited to add:
For what it's worth, I, a lower-middle class, crunchy mama, bought my husband a Baby Bjiorn during the 6th month of my pregnancy. I had already orderd and recieved my sling. Then after reading a bit of the research on it all, decided not to let him use the Bjiorn until a certian age, and by then, she hated it.
Mei Tei's are a slightly similar carrier, and it's actually easier to get the baby in and out of it.
Follow Mothering