Vote on USA Today re: RIC article

[InstinctiveMama]

http://www.usatoday.com/news/health/...mcisions_x.htm

Maybe this link has already been posted here but just in case... USA Today online is running a poll with their RIC article. It's your chance to be heard by mainstream media!

[dynamohumm6]

Originally Posted by InstinctiveMama

http://www.usatoday.com/news/health/...mcisions_x.htm

Maybe this link has already been posted here but just in case... USA Today online is running a poll with their RIC article. It's your chance to be heard by mainstream media!

WOW. I sent in a comment, but WOW....the comments that are already there are AMAZING, and the poll was 89% against RIC when I voted.

maybe there's a glimmer of hope afterall...

[rozzie'sma]

Wow, only 2% have voted yes. This Rocks!

[TigerTail]

'Medical statistics gathered by questionnaire? Self-reported diagnosis of disease!... How meticulously accurate can you get? Now USA Today publishes an article saying the whole world (of males) should be circumcised because of those results, which did not include a clinical examination of a single subject?

Medicine is definitely not science, and this "study" is more fantasy than anything else. Why couldn't the authors get it published in New Zealand? Or anywhere else in the world?'

nice!

[dynamohumm6]

Originally Posted by TigerTail

'Medical statistics gathered by questionnaire? Self-reported diagnosis of disease!... How meticulously accurate can you get? Now USA Today publishes an article saying the whole world (of males) should be circumcised because of those results, which did not include a clinical examination of a single subject?

Medicine is definitely not science, and this "study" is more fantasy than anything else. Why couldn't the authors get it published in New Zealand? Or anywhere else in the world?'

nice!

for real - some of those made me want to stand up and cheer.