Mothering › Forums › Health › The Case Against Circumcision › They retracted him!
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

They retracted him! - Page 2  

post #21 of 23
Has anyone sued over this? Obviously there's physical injury, plus pain and suffering. I'd get the physical injury documented by another physicial TODAY in case you decide you want to sue at some point in the future.

Malpractice lawsuits *do* change how people practice.
post #22 of 23
Quote:
Originally Posted by kldliam View Post

Your child's genital area should be cleaned and dried, then a collection device (a baggie/tape) is attached to collect the urine. If you are asked to collect the urine, be sure the collection device is attached securely to prevent leakage. After your baby has urinated, the urine (at least 20 cc) is transferred to a sterile container.
I suspected a UTI in my 1yo son once. The dr's office gave me a baggie thing and a collection cup. I ended up just catching some mid-stream directly into the cup, like I would if I was providing a sample myself. FWIW the analysis came back clean, so I suppose this method could be sterile enough. If you've got a strong stream and you don't catch the first part or anything that has dripped off other body parts, it seems like that would be better than catching the whole thing in a taped on bag.
post #23 of 23
I'm so sorry!! The nurse was ignorant in everything she said. Our experience with cathing at TX Children's was fine. They knew the right way to do it without retracting. I was still asking questions to make sure and talking their ear off about it and RIGHT ON TOP of the nurse/doc while they did it to make sure. I hope he feels better soon. I'd definitely head to TX Children's next time.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: The Case Against Circumcision
This thread is locked  
Mothering › Forums › Health › The Case Against Circumcision › They retracted him!