Mothering › Forums › Pregnancy and Birth › Birth and Beyond › Homebirth › Midwife vent... Long!
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Midwife vent... Long!  

post #1 of 22
Thread Starter 
Well, if I wasn't motivated to think about UC'ing yet I surely would be after today...

I was discussing protocols with my Midwife in regards to homebirth and was SO NOT PLEASED with the thinly veiled threats and scare tactics involved. :

I'm not talking complicated stuff either...

We don't want midwives hovering around me unless absolutely necessary (Would prefer they be in another room. ) we don't want excessive monitoring, checks, we want my DH to catch the baby, do NOT want to be coached during pushing etc.

We also wanted to know all of the indications for hospital transfer because we've been asking all along and receiving different answers across the board because I've only seen MY midwife 4 times this pregnancy (Half hour visits.) and the rest of the time I'd have to see the other midwives in the practice.

I knew they were conservative thanks to their lovely governing body, but OMFG are they conservative!

If I have to hear "Well, in the end HOW the baby gets there doesn't matter as long as it's healthy." ONE MORE TIME I am going to SCREAM! I was so traumatised by my last birth and had huge PPP/PPD issues only to find out that much of what happened to me could have been prevented had I been fully informed of what was ACTUALLY going on (Hospital protocols and trying to not "upset" the OB...) vs. what I was being threatened with ("Your babies will die." etc.) and I'm realizing that this is a very baby focused vs. mother focused practice.

It's not like I'm wanting to willfully endanger my child, I just want to create a comfortable birthing environment so that the likelihood of having complications are fewer etc. I WANT WHAT'S BEST FOR ME AND MY BABY!

So here's some of the questions I ask...

How hands of can you be, what are the MINIMUM guidelines for care?
I *must* be monitored every 15 minutes with a doppler. We said we thought this was excessive (Heck, in the hospital they were more than content to let an hour or so go by if everything was going well.) and asked if we could waive. We also proposed every half an hour or an hour with shocked results of why would we WANT to risk anything? We mention waiving and are told that it would "...not look good on us as parents if anything happened and there were any records of us not wanting monitoring." Threats now? OMFG... Hello! I have a right to informed consent and will gladly waive anything and last time I checked (And I've checked!) a baby isn't considered to be a person until it's BORN and I have a say in MY OWN CARE!

Not to mention that during transition they want to monitor the WHOLE time. WTF? The last thing I want is someone that close on me when I'm pushing out a baby. Not to mention I'm planning a waterbirth. Again, offer to waive, politely state that we understand that there may be slight additional risks etc., get more of the "it's not important HOW the baby gets here" statements. AGH! We even metioned that we have our OWN doppler with display and will shout if anything drops too much etc., but this is not received well. They "have" to be there. UGH

We also mentioned that we REALLY want DH to catch the baby. A four-handed catch is pretty much presented as the way to go as we want "someone with experience" catching the baby. Insert horror tactic about nuchal cord. We mention that we're completely comfortable with anything that can arise and know when to ask for help especially if they're just in the next room (Hell, DH knows how to handle nuchal cord and IMO we have a better approach to shoulder dystocia than the midwives!) then the tearing issue is brought up. I mention that I don't want my pushing managed and that I believe in instinctive birthing etc, and we banter on that a bit until it's conceded that YES I am willing to tear if it means DH can catch (Because he can't do perineal support if I need it himself obviously...) but they still need to be there in case of resuscitation etc. and why would we risk it? OMFG they're not going to be in the next TOWN- just the next room!!! Enter more patronising lectures on how we "really want" (Oh really, because I'm saying "no we don't" several times over and being pointedly ignored!) someone experienced right there at my crotch. Thank you emergency childbirth- AN 8 YEAR OLD CAN CATCH A BABY for chrissakes!

Yeah, so everything we say pretty much gets shot down. "Why would you want to risk it?" etc. Very un-friendly as far as child protection issues go... Total red flags IMO (This hurts my heart so much. We've had CPS issues with my boys and this is my absolute worst nightmare and they KNOW this and it's being used as a scare tactic. )

So, onto...
What are the indications for transfer?

Breech- They WILL NOT do any sort of breech and it means an automatic transfer to the hospital where I will "have" to have a c-section unless there's time for me to be flown somewhere else where the OB is comfortable with doing breech deliveries. Note that I would REFUSE said transfer as I refuse to be isolated from my community and MY KIDS for a veriation of normal that I could check myself out of the hospital if they won't honor my waiver (Every time I've brought up waivers I've been shot down and I doubt that my wishes would be honored even if I do waive.) and UC the breech at home. (This was what originally led us to looking into UC because we SO DID NOT agree!) When I mention that I would waive if I were in active labor and attempt breech at the hospital I was literally told that I shouldn't do anything that would make the OB "uncomfortable" (SO I'm supposed to have major abdominal surgery and increas the risk to MY LIFE because the Dr. is "uncomfortable"???) and that the hospital has very strict policies and none of the OB's will do it. Again, said I was willing to waiver, and told that I "don't want to do that.", "it would look bad on you" etc. :

ANY meconium- No matter how light the staining. Enter horror story as to why I should go to the hospital and how baby will have to be taken away after delivery and monitored. (!!!) They don't want to risk intubating at home, yadda yadda. (I have my own opinions on vigorous suctioning and intubation and the increased risk of infection because of it.) Yes I agree that there is slight additional risk and I would likely agree to transfer if it was thick or particularily dark fluids etc., but I don't believe that with being 5 mins away from the hospital that light meconium is enough of a reason to go OB automatically and start intervening.

Most of the usual stuff I was FINE with, (Too much bleeding etc.) but the expectations for delivery of placenta and the labor taking too long were ridiculous IMO. Not to mention that I have to get out of the pool to birth the placenta becasue of the "theoretical" risk of water embolism (Which I personally think is crap!)



The thing is, we've been asking all of these questions all along but we've never seen the same midwife twice in a row and never had a striaght answer. When we said we had these questions to ask we were told that they're left for the home visit, which will be happening next week. I've had a lot of threatened labor and I said that I think the baby might be COMING next week or so so I wanted to do this NOW. Thank goodness I did! I'm so thankful to have read up on UC and toyed with it before now because I can't imagine what I'd have been left with if these issues were only brought up at 37 weeks. According to their protocols from the lovely governing body this is all supposed to be dealt with BY 36 WEEKS! (Not to mention my "just in case" pre-admission to the hospital.) The way this practice goes I'll likely have a baby before I get my group B strep done or any of this sorted out. (Which was forgotten.)

The one thing I hate is that our wishes are being COMPLETELY ignored. I understand that they have guidelines they have to obey and that's why we offered to waive, waive, waive to make anyone more comfortable, but they failed to inform me that the "recommendations" are all "musts" and informed consent/choice means "Do what I say or else."

I was fully intending to say "buh-bye" if this Q&A period didn't work out but I was so floored by the possible child protection ramifications that were hinted at. We've been "secretly" intending to UC (We'd be fired as clients and blacklisted if we mentioned it- that much is crystal clear. We thought it would be nice to have the backup if needed even if they never knew they were backup as they'd never know we'd intended to UC if I ended up needing them and we'd tell them after the fact when the baby was born healthy.) but I think I might be coming out of the closet on this one. I want to, but I just don't know if that's safe! It's certainly our only option if we want any semblance of the birth we want or if we want any of our COMPLETELY REASONABLE wishes to be respected.

We're still debating on how/if to fire them because I really don't like what the potential response may be and I have other children to think of as well. I REALLY wish this wasn't left until the last minute. UGH!

Never have I felt so negated as a client/patient. The complete lack of respect when we offer to waive and the thinly veiled disgust at our "risky" attitudes towards our child and the open dismissal of MY WISHES for MY BIRTH have just completely FLOORED me.

Ugh
post #2 of 22
Love and s to you, mama. Sounds like a really tough place to be in.
post #3 of 22
Wow. I am sorry. This has motivated me to probe further with my midwives. I have been putting it off becuase they are my only option in my area, but better to know what I am up against. Though I know some of their protocols and they are more resonable then your midwives. You really not be unreasonable in your reaction to it.

If it were me? I would keep them on my side. If you need to call them as backup you have a good chance of staying at home still, otherwise if anything arises you have no choice but the hospital. (not to be a nay sayer)
post #4 of 22
Whoa Mama, that sucks. I had what I thought was a conservative medwife with my first and she had no problem leaving us alone unless we asked for help. I think they wanted to monitor every hour in theory but it never happened.

You could always have a really 'fast' labor
post #5 of 22
hugs to you.. I would really look into finding another MW.. perhaps even a Lay MW to deliver you instead.. I know switching now is a huge deal..but I know of women who switched at 38 weeks to get the birth they wanted..

Best of luck to you..
post #6 of 22
Thread Starter 
Thanks for the replies so far. Any legal midwives here will still have the same policies as they have the same governing boyd, and I've tried to contact lay midwives in the past (Have had great contact with one in particular.) but nobody lives close enough to me and I can't afford to pay for them let alone their travel expenses.

I'm 100% comfortable with UC and so is my DH, but I wanted to feel like I had backup. It's just a sad thing to go through right now because there's a part of me that want to fire outright and get it over with and use the hospital as our backup (Really, any situations that would need "backup" would require a hospital trip anyways but we'd rather deal with the MW's vs. the HORRID OB's here.) but now I'm scared of the possible child protection consequences or my being blacklisted in the community so we'd have a hard time registering the baby or heaven forbied if we needed to go to the hospital for some reason. (We've already had horrible relations with the hospital and are well known and notorious for going AMA and several other issues.)

BLAH! It's just stress I don't need. I think we'll likely be firing, because in all honesty even if there were a situation in which I feel I did want backup I don't think we'd receive unbiased or supportive care.

I just wanted to feel like there was SOMEONE I could call if I need to kwim?
post #7 of 22
I'm sorry - that's a really tough situation.

Just so you know, using the term "medwife" is a UA violation and you might want to take it out of your post title and post so nothing happens to this thread.

I would keep them as backup b/c they seem better than the OBs at the hospital, and transfer is a real possibility. I would definitely go the "super-fast" labor route. Anyone who's that willing to patronize you would believe the <insert dumb look on face here> "I wasn't even sure if I was in labor until like 5 minutes ago!!!" I always think that having decent backup for a UC is valuable. I know they aren't exactly what you want, but they're better than the OBs, right? And you may need that backup. And part of me thinks that firing them would be less satisfying than you're hoping.

Julia
dd 9mos
post #8 of 22

Oh, WoW! I could've written...

that post about a year ago! Here, where I live there are no legal hb mw's, (there was one, but she is losing her back-up, I think) any way, we went with an underground mw, but kept a relationship with the "CNM", "just in case"...NEVER AGAIN! I TOTALLY get where you are coming from, as I was given SO many scare tactics, and I'd already birthed 5 babies uneventfully!

If (big IF, lol ) we have another baby, I will being doing my own prenatal care, and possibly having a mw come, for support, but prolly UC!
I would encourage you to read as many uc birth stories as you can, it's very empowering!
I've not posted *my* birth story at mdc (it's on another forum), but if ya want to read it, I can put it up, it shows how my mw was the best support, by staying out of the way, and even DISCOURAGING a vaginal exam!

Best wishes, to you!
post #9 of 22
I had another thought. Is there a possibility there's a family MD who would be less intervention-happy than the midwives? Maybe someone like that would be a good hospital backup.

Just a thought.

Julia
dd 9mos
post #10 of 22
wow I am so sorry. My main thought is, if its not important HOW the baby gets here then why are they in the business of midwifery at all?
post #11 of 22

Wow!

Honestly, back in March I could have written your post WORD for WORD. I am so sorry you are going through this.

I'll tell you one thing though. After weeks of trying to suck it up and deal with my midwives, I just said to heck with it and fired them. It was the best decision I ever made. It was 1 day before my due date. I totally thought I had doomed myself to giving birth in the hospital by doing that, but things worked out! I ended up with a great midwife and an absolutely lovely home water birth.

So don't give up and if you are uncomfortable start seeking out other care as soon as possible! Don't wait to see if it gets better. In my experience it only gets worse with midwives like that.

Good luck and let us know how it goes....
post #12 of 22
Quote:
Originally Posted by georgannemomof6 View Post
that post about a year ago! Here, where I live there are no legal hb mw's, (there was one, but she is losing her back-up, I think) any way, we went with an underground mw, but kept a relationship with the "CNM", "just in case"...NEVER AGAIN! I TOTALLY get where you are coming from, as I was given SO many scare tactics, and I'd already birthed 5 babies uneventfully!

If (big IF, lol ) we have another baby, I will being doing my own prenatal care, and possibly having a mw come, for support, but prolly UC!
I would encourage you to read as many uc birth stories as you can, it's very empowering!
I've not posted *my* birth story at mdc (it's on another forum), but if ya want to read it, I can put it up, it shows how my mw was the best support, by staying out of the way, and even DISCOURAGING a vaginal exam!

Best wishes, to you!
I can't believe how many women I've heard of encountering midwives like this. I'm so sorry this happened to you, and to the OP. Its insane.

Op, like georgannemomof6 said, I'd be happy to link my birth story as well if you need some encouragement or good outcomes to meditate on
post #13 of 22
I am frothing at the mouth over here.
Good luck to you, I don't have any advice. I am just pissed on your behalf.
post #14 of 22
wow! that is odd! she is worse than an OB!

post #15 of 22
Thread Starter 
I edited! Sorry about that!

I've been thinking about this a LOT obviously, and whoever said it's almost worse than an OB was right I'm afraid. At least if it were an OB I could waive anything I wanted and show them the printouts I have of their guidelines for accepting my informed consent etc. (I have copies of all the informed consent laws and the guidelines of the obstetrical governing body in my "in case of hospital transfer" backup birthplan just in case so I can point to the law that's on MY side if I said no.) whereas it appears if I say "No" to the midwives and hear "no" in return my only other option would be to seek an OB if they fired me.

Not to mention that as stated effectively I'd have more monitoring at home than in the hospital! At least there the Dr's only pop in every few hours and when the baby's being born. NOT that I would consider it an option LOL.
It's just rather ironic!

Unfortunately there really is no other option for a MD/caregiver and I'm completely okay with that. I don't think I'll end up firing because you never know, and I think at this point it would open such a can of worms that I don't want to get into. We'll just keep on being adamant and truthful about saying how we don't agree with the amount of monitoring/interventions and we WANT TO WAIVE, and again mention that we'll likely call them only when I'm "close" and if my definifion of "close" just happens to be when baby's out then whoopsie. It's funny, because we mentioned holding off as long as possible before calling and that was okay but it's not okay to have someone there that doesn't interfere because of safety issues and the need for monitoring. That's kind of weird/contradictory IMO. I think a whoops may cause some bad blood after the fact, but we knew that going into this when we originally considered UC as an option and I'm okay with it. We'll likely call after the baby's born or is just about to be born and then have the babe looked over and see if I need any stitches as I'd rather have a midwife do that then head to the hospital. Although if the blood is too bad that might be what we have to do (Go to the hospital.) to ensure there are no child protection issues.

On the plus side, we talked with my sons' ped (Did not mention UC, just mentioned that we might be stuck for a caregiver and if we were in the hospital we'd check out early and likely not have anyone to follow up with baby.) and she's fine with overseeing the PKU etc. after the birth if the midwives don't end up doing it or any of the post-partum baby care.


One thing's for sure, NO MATTER WHAT anyone would be hard pressed to prove negligence on our part. We've already arranged for post-partum care for the baby pre-birth, and we have medical equipment on hand for our UC (Suction, oxygen, doppler, manual resuscitator etc.) and are five mins. away from the hospital and KNOW WHEN to transfer, and feel we can confidently handle anything that comes up so I really hope with fingers crossed that won't ever be an issue.

And yes please if anyone wants to PM me the links to their stories I'd LOVE it. I've been doing lots of reading on UC's and have tried to frequent UC forums to get some positive vibes.

thanks so much for teh support. It's so hard to have someone insinuating that we could be willingly harming our child especially with our past history of accusations in that regard when that's OBVIOUSLY not the issue here!
post #16 of 22
I agree. Frothing at the mouth too.

Quote:
Originally Posted by darsmama View Post
I am frothing at the mouth over here.
Good luck to you, I don't have any advice. I am just pissed on your behalf.
post #17 of 22
Quote:
Originally Posted by 3-StarSystem View Post
It's funny, because we mentioned holding off as long as possible before calling and that was okay but it's not okay to have someone there that doesn't interfere because of safety issues and the need for monitoring. That's kind of weird/contradictory IMO.
This isn't really as contradictory as it may seem. If the midwife is THERE, then anything that goes wrong has the potential for being viewed as her fault. If she's not there, she can't be held responsible for any negative outcome. It's a liability issue.
post #18 of 22
I am off and running so haven't even been able to read through your complete post- but just to start with I want to comment on this--
"We also wanted to know all of the indications for hospital transfer "

I don't know about your midwives but for me I can't even keep in/on my mind all the reasons I might suggest a transfer and nor do I think that they are likely at every birth- this almost feels counter-intuitive to me to give an exhaustive list- and each time is fairly individual.
for example reasons I have transfered women in recent history- multiple risk factors converging - cholestasis of pregnancy with PROM over 50 hrs and no labor- early 36 weeks, no impending labor- tried everything in the book-- oh and parents wanted a GBS screen which was scheduled to be done at the time of ROM-- or non-recovering heart tones with occasional lates that were becoming not so occasional in a Primip in active labor but not pushing baby 0 station- transferred listening continously which put parents and my mind more at ease- several hrs later in hospital vaginal birth- MAS baby 38 weeks- retracting but stable with blow by-- transfered moms for pain meds, 2 retained placenta births neither mine but was called over to help out last minute- 1st one partially detached and mom in and out of conciousness- transfer in private car- captured placenta enroute- and not a drop of blood more after that some emotional factors here as well but too long a story --
so I understand that you would like a clearer picture and more control of what is happening and maybe that is more the discussion - how to give you a heads up before transfer..
post #19 of 22
Quote:
Originally Posted by Romana9+2 View Post
Just so you know, using the term "medwife" is a UA violation and you might want to take it out of your post title and post so nothing happens to this thread.
Since when? (Not being snarky, genuinely curious because I've seen it often to describe MWs who are more medically minded.)

I'm sorry you're having to deal with a situation that makes you so uncomfortable right before giving birth. Sounds like you're really stressed about it, and I don't blame you.
post #20 of 22
Wow, i am so pissed off on your behalf. I'm glad to hear you are confident in UC because it sounds like that's the way you need to go to have the birth you want. I personally wouldn't fire the midwives at this point though. I'd probably just use delaying tactics and be evasive to avoid conflicts. It is a red flag all that talk about CPS and I wouldn't put it past them to call them on you themselves. So I'd just keep going with quiet plans for UC and not call the midwives to let them know until well after the birth if ever.

Laura
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Homebirth
This thread is locked  
Mothering › Forums › Pregnancy and Birth › Birth and Beyond › Homebirth › Midwife vent... Long!