DD, age 4 was given a RAST, which came back low positive for crab--I forget the exact number but it was around a .40 or something, and shrimp--.85 ish. The doctor said she doesn't need an epi-pen because shellfish are easy to avoid. She has had skin and GI reactions to mayonnaise, dairy and tomato, so we avoid those foods as well, even though her RAST was negative for those things. She has never had shellfish, so I have no idea how or if she would actually react.
How seriously do we need to take the shellfish allergy? My understanding is that the low positive is a good sign--either of a false positive or a low likelihood of reacting. On the other hand, I understand that ANA reactions can happen out of nowhere, and we live on the East Coast where seafood is everywhere. I feel like I would rather have the epi-pen and not worry about whether she might have a reaction out of nowhere that I am totally unprepared for. But I feel silly pushing the issue if her RAST numbers indicate that there is no reason to expect a severe reaction.
Any thoughts?
How seriously do we need to take the shellfish allergy? My understanding is that the low positive is a good sign--either of a false positive or a low likelihood of reacting. On the other hand, I understand that ANA reactions can happen out of nowhere, and we live on the East Coast where seafood is everywhere. I feel like I would rather have the epi-pen and not worry about whether she might have a reaction out of nowhere that I am totally unprepared for. But I feel silly pushing the issue if her RAST numbers indicate that there is no reason to expect a severe reaction.
Any thoughts?








)
