Mothering › Forums › Health › Vaccinations › More Merck Tricks with HPV Vaccine
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

More Merck Tricks with HPV Vaccine  

post #1 of 85
Thread Starter 
or as the author of this article calls it HocusPocusVaccine:

http://healthtruthrevealed.com/full-...&&page=article
post #2 of 85
An early version of the Virginia house bill contained a clause addressing liability issues “if a female who is inoculated with the HPV vaccine becomes incapable of naturally conceiving a healthy child carried to live birth or experiences impaired fertility as a result of the HPV vaccine”.

Where would Virginia legislators get the idea that this vaccine could impair fertility?

“Gardasil contains Polysorbate 80, which is linked to infertility in mice,” noted Dee Nicholson, National Communications Director for Freedom in Canadian Health Care.
post #3 of 85
The Merck HocusPocusVaccine contains sodium borate (a common roach killer) in each of its three doses.

The National Library of Medicine (NLM) of the National Institutes of Health notes of sodium borate that it “is now known to be a dangerous poison, it is no longer commonly used in medical preparations.”

That was published in 2005. Yet the FDA in 2006 approved the Merck vaccine with this “dangerous poison” to be “commonly used” in these vaccinations that are most definitively “medical preparations”.

The symptoms of sodium borate poisoning according to the NLM citation include many of the side effects being reported after less than six months of the vaccine usage. These include convulsions, collapse, and seizures (twitching of facial muscles, arms, hands, legs, and feet).


Isn't sodium borate Borax?
post #4 of 85
This from Wikipedia:

Borax is used as a food additive in some countries with the E number E285, but is banned in the United States.
post #5 of 85
post #6 of 85
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Poisoning may also occur in those who are repeatedly exposed to sodium borate. In the past, boric acid was used to disinfect and treat wounds. Patients who received such treatment over and over again got sick, and some died. Because boric acid is now known to be a dangerous poison, it is no longer commonly used in medical preparations. However, boric acid is contained in some vaginal suppositories used for yeast infections, although this is NOT a standard treatment.
From LI's above link.
post #7 of 85
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cyneburh View Post
:
From the Gardasil product insert:

225 mcg aluminum
50 mcg of polysorbate 80 (Tween 80)
35 mcg of sodium borate



Don't worry though . . . the eeeensy, weeeensy, teeensy amount in each dose of Gardasil is harmless.
post #8 of 85
OMG!

:

They are blatantly trying to what.... ???? kill us ??????

Or make us more and more dependent upon them and their drugs???
post #9 of 85
http://www.food.gov.uk/multimedia/pdfs/boron.pdf#page=9

53. Kliegel (1980) has described mild to severe responses to boron compounds.
Nineteen patients with epilepsy or infections developed body hair loss as a response
to boron compound treatment. Stein et al. (1973) described a 32-year-old woman
with pancreatitis who ingested and swallowed several bottles of mouthwash
containing boric acid daily for a minimum of 1 year. She lost almost all of her body
and scalp hair
and also developed erythema on the palms of her hands, severe fatigue,
anorexia, and mental confusion. Her blood boric acid level was 32 ÎĽg/ml,
corresponding to 5.6 ÎĽg boron/ml (the normal value has been reported as 3 ÎĽg boric
acid/ml). Upon cessation of mouthwash consumption, hair growth returned,
suggesting that the effect was reversible.




Where's your VAERS "hair loss" thread, LI?
post #10 of 85
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2005 Dec ;95 (6):593-9 16400901
Polysorbate 80 in medical products and nonimmunologic anaphylactoid reactions.

Whereas its relevance as a contact allergen has declined during the past decades, it is of current relevance as a "hidden" inductor of anaphylactoid reactions.

CONCLUSIONS: Polysorbate 80 is a ubiquitously used solubilizing agent that can cause severe nonimmunologic anaphylactoid reactions.

http://lib.bioinfo.pl/auth:Mahler,V
post #11 of 85
Quote:
Originally Posted by LongIsland View Post
An early version of the Virginia house bill contained a clause addressing liability issues “if a female who is inoculated with the HPV vaccine becomes incapable of naturally conceiving a healthy child carried to live birth or experiences impaired fertility as a result of the HPV vaccine”.

Where would Virginia legislators get the idea that this vaccine could impair fertility?

“Gardasil contains Polysorbate 80, which is linked to infertility in mice,” noted Dee Nicholson, National Communications Director for Freedom in Canadian Health Care.
I brought this up in another thread because whether or not the possibilty of creating infertility is conscious or unconscious on the part of the vaccine makers, this possibility must be known by the recipients of the vaccine. Vaccine makers have been caught putting anti-fertility hormones in their products. That is not a theory. The foundations that fund the vaccine industry do have publicly stated goals to reduce world population. That is not a theory.

The industry people who created the bill (legislators rarely create and sometimes do not even read the bills) knew something was amiss or they would not have included that clause.
post #12 of 85
Quote:
Originally Posted by LongIsland View Post
An early version of the Virginia house bill contained a clause addressing liability issues “if a female who is inoculated with the HPV vaccine becomes incapable of naturally conceiving a healthy child carried to live birth or experiences impaired fertility as a result of the HPV vaccine”.

Where would Virginia legislators get the idea that this vaccine could impair fertility?

“Gardasil contains Polysorbate 80, which is linked to infertility in mice,” noted Dee Nicholson, National Communications Director for Freedom in Canadian Health Care.
Looks like that quote is actually straight outta TX, not VA.

http://www.newswithviews.com/Devvy/kidd247.htm

'Course the only places I can find it are not exactly real news sites, so I'm not really sure. Maybe you have a better link than I do. Google turns it up on newswithviews and planetquo.com but both of those are anti-vax sites. On planet quo it's referred to as "depopulation" policy. :

I don't know why our government would want to depopulate this country...I mean, who'd pay taxes?

Whoops! Edited to add... I only googled the first quote. The second one is actually found on healthtruthrevealed.com (anti-vax site) and savethemales.ca (don't know *what* that is about!). Also on a few blogs. But not in a reputable news source that I could find.
post #13 of 85
Quote:
Originally Posted by Scattershoot View Post
I brought this up in another thread because whether or not the possibilty of creating infertility is conscious or unconscious on the part of the vaccine makers, this possibility must be known by the recipients of the vaccine. Vaccine makers have been caught putting anti-fertility hormones in their products. That is not a theory. The foundations that fund the vaccine industry do have publicly stated goals to reduce world population. That is not a theory.

The industry people who created the bill (legislators rarely create and sometimes do not even read the bills) knew something was amiss or they would not have included that clause.
I have heard this, and I have read about some of the ingredients, but I wonder if you have more information to back this statement up. Not doubting you, but it seems powerful and worthy of note, so I would like to know more about it.
post #14 of 85
Quote:
Originally Posted by prettypixels View Post
'Course the only places I can find it are not exactly real news sites, so I'm not really sure. Maybe you have a better link than I do. Google turns it up on newswithviews and planetquo.com but both of those are anti-vax sites. On planet quo it's referred to as "depopulation" policy. :

I don't know why our government would want to depopulate this country...I mean, who'd pay taxes?

Whoops! Edited to add... I only googled the first quote. The second one is actually found on healthtruthrevealed.com (anti-vax site) and savethemales.ca (don't know *what* that is about!). Also on a few blogs. But not in a reputable news source that I could find.
Here ya go pp: http://leg1.state.va.us/cgi-bin/legp...+amd+HB2035AHR

1. After line 73, substitute
insert

G. The Commonwealth waives immunity from tortuous liability if a female who is inoculated with the HPV vaccine becomes incapable of naturally conceiving a healthy child carried to live birth or experiences impaired fertility as a result of the HPV vaccine.
post #15 of 85
So, I'm not good with lawyer-lingo. Does this mean that they were PLANNING to make the state of VA immune to liability - but didn't? (The ammendment was rejected.)
post #16 of 85
Quote:
Originally Posted by Scattershoot View Post
I brought this up in another thread because whether or not the possibilty of creating infertility is conscious or unconscious on the part of the vaccine makers, this possibility must be known by the recipients of the vaccine. Vaccine makers have been caught putting anti-fertility hormones in their products. That is not a theory. The foundations that fund the vaccine industry do have publicly stated goals to reduce world population. That is not a theory.

The industry people who created the bill (legislators rarely create and sometimes do not even read the bills) knew something was amiss or they would not have included that clause.

Do you have sources that state the "vaccine makers have been caught putting anti-fertility hormones in their products"? I totally believe you but would like to add those sources that state that to my ever growing pile of anti-vax materials.

Thanks,
Shannon
post #17 of 85
Prior to my entrance into nursing school I was required to be vaccinated again in addition to the childhood vaccines I had already been given. I was required in my 4 years of nursing school to get two TdaP vaccines, the Hepatitis A series, the Hepatitis B series, 2 MMR vaccines, and 2 Varicella vaccines.

My family has never had any history of fertility problems or issues. I suffered 6 miscarriages prior to having my son, and had placenta issues with my pregnancy with him. I then had a huge subchorionic bleed with my pregnancy with my daughter.

I have no idea if it had anything to do with the vaccines I received for nursing school. However, hearing that the vaccines contain components which affect fertility I can't help but wonder. :

ETA: Oh and don't forget my yearly required Flu Shot!

Also ETA: Why was I required to get two Varicella vaccines when I had already had the chicken pox as a child? A quite nasty case of them as well. Grrrrr
post #18 of 85
Wow. If its really true that some vaccines can cause infertility then wow. Just wow. I can not even begin to imagine what will happen if in 10-15 years all these little girls who are getting vaxed right now end up having fertility issues. That will be huge, huge, huge, huge, huge! ::shiver::

Also, reading about all the requirements for medical/nursing school has made any desire I ever had to go into such fields vaporize! Scary, scary scary!!
post #19 of 85
holy crap!!

and its not borax, its boric acid.


eta: ok, maybe i should read rather than skim, lol, but there ya go
post #20 of 85
Quote:
Originally Posted by onelilguysmommy View Post
holy crap!!

and its not borax, its boric acid.


maybe i should read rather than skim, lol, but there ya go


Sodium borate is borax.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Vaccinations
This thread is locked  
Mothering › Forums › Health › Vaccinations › More Merck Tricks with HPV Vaccine