Harry Potter.... NOT Circed - Page 2

[kxsiven]

Huh, at least his buttocks look *very* intact.

..still caughing my morning coffee from my lungs...

He certainly has grown up!

http://www.metro.co.uk/fame/article....9&in_page_id=7

[trmpetplaya]

Originally Posted by kxsiven

Huh, at least his buttocks look *very* intact.

..still caughing my morning coffee from my lungs...

He certainly has grown up!

http://www.metro.co.uk/fame/article....9&in_page_id=7

Hehehe... Warner Bros is not happy, eh? I bet this shook them up a bit...

love and peace.

[onelilguysmommy]

im kinda confused to how daniel radcliffes penis works makes the harry potter series any better??

but umm okay lol

[Just Me]

Originally Posted by anony

Well I've read that his mother is jewish and that makes it official. But he has said he doesn't consider himself a jew nor practice the religion. And his dad is protestant or something. Seeing UK's policy on circ, I would think that makes it likely he isn't cut. But, you never know. Perhaps his mother and/or her family intervened to make sure he had an official mark of being a jew? Who knows.

If his dad didn't object strongly, then I can see how it would've happened. Don't get downhearted if it's true, all you Harry Potter fanatics. Daniel Radcliffe likely wouldn't do it to his own son if he weren't a practicing jew considering the rarity of hospitals that would perform circ. It's obviously a discouraged procedure in the UK and Europe as a whole. And there's likely a a predominant % of British celebs out there who never got cut fortunately for them.

I live in the UK.. Circ is not routinely in hospitals here. BUT there are clincs and such for those who have it done privately, such as for religious reasons, and also Jews have it done by a trained rabbi during a bris ceremony, which has nothing to do with our national health service. Circ WAS routine until the 70's, so the Brit celeb thing....depends on how old they are. Under 35, prob intact unless dome privately. Over 35, prob done, as it was routine for boys of 7 to have it done at that time, on the National health Service. My husband told me about being 7 and all the boys he went to school with getting the letter, and the parents taking them to hosital where they went in one after the other to be circ'd under a GA. It was like an assembly line. Seriously.

[intorainbowz]

Originally Posted by trmpetplaya

Hehehe... Warner Bros is not happy, eh? I bet this shook them up a bit...

love and peace.

In public they are saying they are supportive blah blah blah....

I highly doubt that they want the lead actor in one of their most successful childrens series out there doing this. And yes, I am well aware adults like HP too.

And why this is important, because it helps normalize being intact. It makes me go YAY!!! my boy won't be alone. When I hear that it's sexier to be cut, I can say... But Leo DiCaprio is whole, and that is one fine man. I can now say Daniel is whole, and even on the CLOTHED pics off of MSNBC he looked hot.

I clicked on the MSNBC story on this at work and it had the top half of this picture on the page. I nearly died and the important part was below the scroll and I was very worried that the ahem full shot was on there. I scrolled down, and thankfully there were pants.

[Momtwice]

Clip of DR discussing his views on religion.
http://www.jewtastic.com/posts/4449

[minimunklemama]

Originally Posted by Past_VNE

It is definitely a fake. A woman made it on photoshop and later admitted it publicly.

I might still have to keep it

[roxyrox]

The play started on the 27th Feb - surely someone should know by now! I live in London and might go see it myself so I will report back whether he is the full deal or not!

[gottaknit]

Isn't he a minor? Intact or not, this whole discussion is a inappropriate, don't you think?

If the male members of MDC started a thread to ogle naked pictures of a teenage girl, I don't think the thread would be around long...

[New Mexico Beach]

I've seen the pic and thought it was a beautiful pic, but after looking again I think you can tell that it's photoshopped. What is his leg resting on? The horses leg? I don't think that would work very well (In fact, I can't even see the horse's leg). And it looks like his hand is holding the rope that is "supposed" to be around the horse, but isn't.

Having said that, I think the photo gives intact penises a good name. It's very nice.

[New Mexico Beach]

Oh, and I'm pretty sure the age of consent is only 16 or 17 over there.

[Zamber]

: They would not do the show if it was illegal.
They don't freak out about nudity like we do here in America. To them, this is as normal as breathing.

The only thing I have found in searches is people discussing his size, not whether or not he is intact. So, those of you that live in the area - go see it and report back!

[Fi.]

Isn't he a minor?

He's age of consent in his country. If he was a minor do you really think that picture of his (cute) backside would have been posted?

And no one's ogling, they're stating/commenting that he has a nice body/whether or not he's intact/etc. It's not even a pornographic photo, it's a picture of him nude in a play. That's hardly sexual.

[flapjack]

I know someone who's seen it (the play) and he's intact. Generally you don't see very many circ'ed penises on the media at all over here.

[flapjack]

Oh, and to add, at the age of 5 over here the docs start screening for phimosis and treating with steroid creams. The assumption seems to be that if a foreskin doesn't fully retract by 7, it comes off.

[Cassandra M.]

Originally Posted by GoodMomma

I looked at the picture and forget what his penis looks like... Harry Potter is getting HOT, LOL!!

Originally Posted by gottaknit

Isn't he a minor? Intact or not, this whole discussion is a inappropriate, don't you think?

If the male members of MDC started a thread to ogle naked pictures of a teenage girl, I don't think the thread would be around long...

I agree with you, it FREAKS ME OUT that a character my 6 yr old daughter loves is being scutinized and crushed out by grown women. But if it's what he's doing now (nudity) and he's of legal age in his own country, I guess. That's more than I knew when I was initially disgusted.

I'm glad you posted, I was getting worried that I was the only one who found it odd.

[Lila]

I found it a bit odd, too, BUT- he is clearly doing this to assert himself as a man- to demonstrate that he's not just Harry Potter anymore and that he's certainly not a child anymore. He had to expect to be scrutinized. As long as nobody says anything off-color, I think this discussion is warranted.

[hunnybumm]

I think him acting in the play is awesome. Just because he played Harry Potter in the movie doesn't mean he IS Harry Potter. He is an actor. He is a man. He is not a character from a children's book, he PLAYED a character from a children's book in a movie. I would love to see him play different rolls and see how he fairs.

I also think it's awesome that he is intact. I think it's awesome when ANYONE is intact.

[gottaknit]

I wasn't "freaking out over nudity" in the play . There's a huge difference between an actor having nude scenes in a play (absolutely fine), and grown women salivating over a naked (photoshop-enhanced) teenage boy on a mothering site.

I think it is hypocritical that I keep seeing this same type of thread about him all over the boards this week, on a site full of members who get up in arms over gender equality on any other issue. :

If I posted links to naked pictures of Ashley Simpson with the title "Check out her tits!" in the breastfeeding forum, people would go through the roof. Don't even pretend that this thread has anything to do with Intactivism.

[moonmama7]

Totally WEIRD, GROSS and INAPPROPRIATE for GROWN women (and mothers at that) to be gawping at ANY body part of a teenager and speculating about his genitals.

If you caught your husband doing this over Hermione (or whoever the actress is that plays her), would you be comfortable with that?

YUCK.