I just wanted to say that I'm glad I'm old fashioned.
post #501 of 575
3/29/07 at 2:23pm
|
i've been wantng to post this question in religious studies but really want an LDS point of view seeing as how it seems we view sin somewhat differently. my question is is sin a sin if you don't know you're sinning? can one really be held accountable for masturbation if they don't know it's a no-no? tha's just one example of many. i think of this because where i was disfellowshipped for fornication DH didn't have to go through that process because he later converted and 'didn't know better' he didn't make the covenants i had made, either. so if it isn't a sin then how far do we go? if one murders without knowledge that it's wrong are they then in the clear? my first thought is no because we all are born with the 'knowledge' that taking someone's free agency is wrong. murder, rape, pedophillia, etc etc. but then there are those who don't have that 'off' button. can they really be held accountable?
|
|
thanks for your post, Tara. i actually hink it seems more fair then condeming someone for doing something they don't know is wrong. does that make sense? i just couldn't see that happening. i guess that's why in life it's hard for me to expect every non member to have our 'vaues'. i can't get upset with someone for going to a strip club when they honest to goodness don't see the issue with it.
|
|
The thing that does get to me sometimes is when they mock or belittle my beliefs because I feel like I try SO HARD NOT to do that to anyone else - but then again, just makes me stronger, right?
|
: after all, we are only accountable for ourselves at the end of the day. well, our children to a certain extent. you get my point.
|
i've been wantng to post this question in religious studies but really want an LDS point of view seeing as how it seems we view sin somewhat differently. my question is is sin a sin if you don't know you're sinning? can one really be held accountable for masturbation if they don't know it's a no-no? tha's just one example of many. i think of this because where i was disfellowshipped for fornication DH didn't have to go through that process because he later converted and 'didn't know better' he didn't make the covenants i had made, either. so if it isn't a sin then how far do we go? if one murders without knowledge that it's wrong are they then in the clear? my first thought is no because we all are born with the 'knowledge' that taking someone's free agency is wrong. murder, rape, pedophillia, etc etc. but then there are those who don't have that 'off' button. can they really be held accountable?
|
|
Oh great! SOmenoe elsewhere just pointed out that with 8 cavities they would be freaking out about absessing. I know a woman who died from an abssessed tooth. Now I'm crying!!!!!!!!!!
|
Visit the dental forum. There are a lot of MDC mamas who do NOT get their kids' teeth worked on. They watch carefully for pain and infection (abcess), but don't get the cavities filled or teeth capped/pulled. You can also try the yahoogroup veryyoungkidsteeth.
|
i've been wantng to post this question in religious studies but really want an LDS point of view seeing as how it seems we view sin somewhat differently. my question is is sin a sin if you don't know you're sinning? can one really be held accountable for masturbation if they don't know it's a no-no?
|
| The scriptures tell us that "it is impossible for a man to be saved in ignorance" (D&C 131:6). This principle is greatly misunderstood. Elder John A. Widtsoe wrote: There are of course many kinds of knowledge; some of lesser, some of higher value. When Joseph Smith said that a man cannot be saved in ignorance, he meant naturally ignorance of the laws which all together lead to salvation. Such knowledge is of the highest value. It should be sought after first. Then other kinds of knowledge may be added to support and amplify the more direct knowledge of spiritual law. For example, it is a duty of the Church to preach the gospel to all the world. This however requires the aid of railroads, steamships, printing presses, and a multitude of other things that make up our civilization. A knowledge of the gospel is the missionary's first need, but the other needs, though lesser, help him perform better the divine injunction to teach the gospel to all people. [Evidences and Reconciliations, arr. G. Homer Durham (Salt Lake City: Bookcraft, 1987), p. 224] Of course, today we require knowledge about passenger jets, computers, satellite communications, and so on, but Elder Widtsoe's point still holds. What he inferred is there must needs be an order to our learning, the same order indicated by the Savior's teaching: "But seek ye first the kingdom of God, and his righteousness; and all these things shall be added unto you" (Matthew 6:33). Learning about sacred things should come first, providing a context and a need for secular learning. If we want to return to our Heavenly Father's presence, our first priority should be to learn about his ways and his plan. |

Over the last three years I have taken out piercings other than my ears, and toned down my hair (only a bit- it is still a flaming red!)...
: ) and my high combat boots. The only seats available were next to a young man with many visible tats, an orange mohawk, and lovely combat boots. After sm, I chatted with him a while, and learned he was looking into the church.
|
Hi all,
nak, my mom wants to watch "happy feet" with my ds(4.5yrs). I saw that it was rated PG and worried that it might be too scary or crude for him. Has anyone seen this? I need to let my mom know if they can watch it. thanks |
|
About Happy Feet, I was talking with another mom at the park shortly after it came out (she's not LDS) and I wouldn't recommend it. We haven't seen it. I just try to steer clear of PG movies all together right now, the kids are too young.
She said that there were a lot of inuendos in the movie. Granted it goes over the kids' heads but when does that stop and after how many times of exposure. |



Follow Mothering