Quote:
Originally Posted by grendal82002 
I've seen alot of boards ban the talk of circumcision because they dont want to upset anyone. Its rather sad becuase they allow parents who chose to circ their child to post comments and questions about adhesions and various complications that follow circumcisions, but they dont allow parents on the other side of the fence, who chose to leave their child intact, to post about their child being intact and how by not circ'ing they were able to avoid those problems. It's really sad!
|
Yes, it is, and it needs people who have left their children intact to make their presence felt, even if it means upsetting people, whether they "allow" it or not - it can't be beyond the wit of man to point out that if they hadn't interfered with their child's penis in the first place this wouldn't happen, and then point out all the advice regarding adhesions ie. basically leave it alone and treat it as though it were intact, they will resolve on their own when the child would have been ready to be retractile anyway.
There must be some way of putting it that doesn't violate user agreements, and perhaps this is a time when user agreements need to be questioned. If enough people post perhaps it might make some of them think twice about what they are doing, and that it is far more trouble to circumcise than not. Or are the admin going to ban everyone? As I said above
remember the lurkers, they are the ones you are trying to reach rather than the screaming, guilt ridden, posters who are likely to flame you.
Let's face it
anything is better than silence and tacit aquiescence. That's how they've managed to stay in their comfortable cutting bubble for so long.