Mothering › Forums › Health › The Case Against Circumcision › "Circumcision Does Not Prevent Spread of HIV, Experts Warn"
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

"Circumcision Does Not Prevent Spread of HIV, Experts Warn"  

post #1 of 8
Thread Starter 
Here is a discussion of the results of new studies about HIV and circumcision in Africa.

Quote:
As against common notion and previous studies, the study findings have proved that circumcision of males and female genital mutilation of virgins can in no way stem the spread of HIV. On the contrary they only serve to spread HIV.
post #2 of 8
This is a good start, just perused not finished reading but I did see the article refer to MGM as "removing of the excess skin at the tip of the penis." The skin is not excess, it is a functional organ...wrong message to be sending, i think.
post #3 of 8
Argh, MGM is 'circumcision' & female circumcision is 'female genital mutilation'- people can't see that inconsistancy?

All the boys in Africa that die are from 'botched' circs; all the girls that die are from a horrible traditional blood ritual! I am going to start referring to dear foreskin-harvesting Oprah's beloved victims as having suffered from a 'botched' circumcision- as though if it had gone according to plan, all would be peachy.
post #4 of 8
If I posted this before, please forgive me.


FGM, circumcision "likely to spread HIV"
afrol News, 26 February - New research dramatically contradicts the popular conclusions of recently published reports, holding that male circumcision protects against contracting AIDS. Scientists looking at male circumcision and female genital mutilation (FGM) practices in Kenya, Lesotho and Tanzania found that the cut in itself was causing many new AIDS cases among adolescents.

The research, published in the March issue of the scientific journal 'Annals of Epidemiology', was carried out by a team of researchers led by Devon Brewer, director of the research firm Interdisciplinary Scientific Research. "We found that circumcised virgins and adolescents in Kenya, Lesotho, and Tanzania were consistently and substantially more likely to be infected with HIV than their uncircumcised counterparts," Mr Brewer said.

The researchers analysed data from the 'Demographic and Health Surveys', which are based on nationally representative samples of adolescents and adults. In the three African countries studied, circumcision is typically performed in adolescence or early adulthood and often in unhygienic circumstances where many individuals are circumcised with shared, unsterilised cutting instruments.

"Sexually experienced male adolescents were no more likely to be infected than adolescent virgins, further highlighting how HIV may be spreading by means other than sex," the researchers concluded.

Mr Brewer said "a key problem with nearly all prior research on circumcision in Africa is that researchers have treated circumcision only as an anatomic characteristic, and not also as a potential exposure to others' blood during the circumcision operation." He continued, "this is striking, because over the last 20 years, many Africans, including children, have warned that HIV can spread through circumcision procedures."

The new results in particular raise questions about how to understand the recent randomised trials of male circumcision in South Africa, Kenya, and Uganda. These studies, in which some uncircumcised men were randomly assigned to be circumcised in presumably sterile conditions and others were not circumcised, showed that male circumcision reduced HIV acquisition.

The popular news reporting of these findings has been widespread in Africa. And the basic message in African media has been that circumcising young boys - and sometimes girls - will protect them from contracting HIV-AIDS. The new study however shows that this conclusion is not only wrong, but also a dangerous message, due to the poor hygienic standards normally applied at circumcision ceremonies.

Mr Brewer said, "If we had known several years ago what we know now from the national surveys, there would not have been a good empirical basis even to conduct the trials. Therefore, it is crucial to investigate thoroughly the possible mechanisms - which are speculative at this point - for the protective effect observed in the trials."

The US researcher and his colleagues finally called for more intensive study of HIV transmission in the context of both traditional and medical circumcision in sub-Saharan Africa.



By staff writer
http://www.afrol.com:80/articles/24469
post #5 of 8
Well, regardless of the terminology used, at least this study didn't exclude female circ from the equation, the way the highly-publicised "circ prevents HIV" studies did. Plus they studied circ the way it actually happens in Africa, not a controlled condition that can't be replicated outside of the study.

I wonder how much publicity THIS study will get- I predict not very much.
post #6 of 8
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ruthla View Post
Well, regardless of the terminology used, at least this study didn't exclude female circ from the equation, the way the highly-publicised "circ prevents HIV" studies did. Plus they studied circ the way it actually happens in Africa, not a controlled condition that can't be replicated outside of the study.

I wonder how much publicity THIS study will get- I predict not very much.
Don't be afraid to forward the article to all you know. I included the website address at the bottom of the article.
post #7 of 8
<<If I posted this before, please forgive me.>>

As far as I'm concerned, you needn't apologize for duplicate postings on this subject. I agree that we need to send this article out to all the people in our address books. Since the intactivist movement doesn't have a full time "press spinner" like the cutters seem to have, it's up to the people to get the message out far and wide. Never doubt the power of the net.

Baybee
post #8 of 8
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ruthla View Post
Well, regardless of the terminology used, at least this study didn't exclude female circ from the equation, the way the highly-publicised "circ prevents HIV" studies did. Plus they studied circ the way it actually happens in Africa, not a controlled condition that can't be replicated outside of the study.

I wonder how much publicity THIS study will get- I predict not very much.
Unless we all spread it like crazy. I think everyone who has a blog, website, members of other forums should POST POST POST this everywhere! Hell stuff like myspace and livejournal are free, make up a quick personality and POST!

~Nay
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: The Case Against Circumcision
This thread is locked  
Mothering › Forums › Health › The Case Against Circumcision › "Circumcision Does Not Prevent Spread of HIV, Experts Warn"