secret testing on children - Page 2

[glendora]

Originally Posted by treereach

I don't know who Baal is or why Jesus would want to come anywhere near here. But here's a bit on El Salvador:

The conspiracy theory on El Salvador is that we went down there because they refused our help in lowering their birth rates.

http://home.iae.nl/users/lightnet/wo...population.htm

Like I said, "dog whistle" terms. If you're "in the club" you hear a whole different story.

"Useless eaters" is a phrase used when talking about population control and nefarious government plans to reject God's plan that humankind be fruitful and multiply, using war, "chemtrails," vaccines, AIDS, selective famine, etc. It's related to a secret society (The Club of Rome and something called "The Committee of 300," in this case, I do believe, but for some reason it always comes back to Jewish Bankers and/or the Illuminati, ya know?) controlling mankind for their own evil, and usually anti-Christian, agenda.

More: http://www.geocities.com/newageinter...pulation1.html

[Crisstiana]

Originally Posted by glendora

The conspiracy theory on El Salvador is that we went down there because they refused our help in lowering their birth rates.

http://home.iae.nl/users/lightnet/wo...population.htm

Like I said, "dog whistle" terms. If you're "in the club" you hear a whole different story.

"Useless eaters" is a phrase used when talking about population control and nefarious government plans to reject God's plan that humankind be fruitful and multiply, using war, "chemtrails," vaccines, AIDS, selective famine, etc. It's related to a secret society (The Club of Rome and something called "The Committee of 300," in this case, I do believe, but for some reason it always comes back to Jewish Bankers and/or the Illuminati, ya know?) controlling mankind for their own evil, and usually anti-Christian, agenda.

More: http://www.geocities.com/newageinter...pulation1.html

Wow...interesting in a didn't-know-it-exists-and-find-it-fascinating-while-completely-rejecting-it sort of way. Not knowing much about conspiracies, I completely missed the references. Thanks for the info, Glendora!

[treereach]

But what if it's true? : (not the illuminati part) I hear all the time about our birth rates dropping. What if they're trying to, 'bring everyone up to speed', industrially speaking, so we can maintain dominance?

[glendora]

Originally Posted by treereach

But what if it's true? : (not the illuminati part) I hear all the time about our birth rates dropping. What if they're trying to, 'bring everyone up to speed', industrially speaking, so we can maintain dominance?

My general opinion on conspiracy theories of that kind of magnitude--the goofy secret societies, the hidden occult agendas, all that--is that anyone that sincerely believes it's a secret that rich dudes control the world's resources just wants to feel like they are special with Super Secret Squirrel Knowledge the rest of us plebes can't HANDLE!!!

I mean... look at Congress, look at the tops of the Fortune 1000, look at the publicly stated goals of permanent hegemony in US foreign policy. There's no conspiracy. Rich people control the world in a pretty open fashion. They always have. It doesn't take a brain washing, or hidden alien bases, or secret handshakes.

That said, the "population control" theory simply doesn't make any sense, unless you add a heavy dose of pretty ridiculous mysticism.

Let's say you're Evil Industrialist. Which is better? Large, desperate populations are perfect populations to take advantage of in an industrial sense--they're work for less, in crappier conditions, for longer hours, at more dangerous jobs. What good is a healthy, "up-to-speed" third world population to corporate multinationals? The "resource distribution" explanation doesn't hold water. The west will let you starve. We've got absolutely no problem with it, collectively. The only way to make the "population control" concept feasible is to invent a group with an overarching pathological commitment to science ("Secular Humanism"), and paint it in vaguely religious tones. And, really... that just doesn't make any sense.

[tylertyler]

http://www.mercola.com/2007/mar/24/i...ssian-kids.htm

GlaxoSmithKline vaccines
denied claims of neurological illnesses?


TYLER

[KatWrangler]

Originally Posted by tylertyler

http://www.mercola.com/2007/mar/24/i...ssian-kids.htm

GlaxoSmithKline vaccines
denied claims of neurological illnesses?


TYLER

Isn't this Mercola guy a quack?

[tylertyler]

He is only the messenger,the Original articles are posted via the link.As he ALWAYS DOES. None of the posted articles are by Mercola himself,the direct links are always enclosed. in this case
Direct links to:
MEDSCAPE
REUTERS

[glendora]

But, you didn't link to the articles. You linked to Mercola's opinion of the articles. Why should I listen to Mercola trying to sell me things over some other salesman trying to sell me things?

[tylertyler]

Listen ............your well and abel to link on the original articles all by yourself arent you?
And the point here is?

[tylertyler]

DID THE WORK FOR YOU!!!!!!!!!


PLEASE READ THE ORIGINAL ARTICLE........................................... ........

Russia probes "illegal" tests of Glaxo vaccines
Fri Mar 2, 2007 8:45am ET
Market View
GSK (GlaxoSmithKline )
Last: 1,414.00p
Change: +1.00 (+0.07%)
Revenue (ttm): £23,225.0M
EPS: 0.95
Market Cap: £81,408.13M
Time: 12:35pm ET



Stock Details
Company Profile
Analyst Research
advertisement
Company News:
FTSE pares gains after UK data; banks, miners up
UPDATE 2-RESEARCH ALERT-JP Morgan cuts Glaxo, AstraZeneca
More Company News...
At the Helm:
Jean-Pierre Garnier
Chief Executive Officer, Director

Salary: USD 1,700,000
Bonus: USD 3,080,000
Age: 59


Dr. Garnier was appointed on 23rd May 2000 as the Chief Executive Officer of GlaxoSmithKline plc. Dr. Garnier was appointed an Executive Director of... Full Bio

Full Management Team
Insider Trading Email This Article | Print This Article | Reprints [-] Text [+] By Olesya Dmitracova

MOSCOW, March 2 (Reuters) - Russian prosecutors are investigating a local hospital on suspicions it illegally tested vaccines made by GlaxoSmithKline Plc (GSK.L: Quote, Profile , Research) on toddlers, making them ill and hampering their development.

Europe's biggest drugmaker denied the claims and said there was no evidence of adverse events or misconduct in the way the study had been carried out.

Glaxo vaccines were tested on more than 100 children between one and two years of age at the hospital in Volgograd after Russian health authorities approved the trials in 2005.

Reuters Pictures

Editors Choice: Best pictures
from the last 24 hours.
View Slideshow

But prosecutors claim parents were not properly informed and they thought these were routine vaccinations.

According to the prosecutors, Glaxo paid the clinic in southwestern Russia $50,000 to conduct the trials, which made some children ill.

"According to the contract, only healthy children can take part in this experiment," said a spokeswoman for the Volgograd region prosecutors, Lydia Sergeyeva.

"In this case all children were sent for trials, healthy or unhealthy

[glendora]

The point is that questionable sources are doing a disservice to the points you are trying to make.

And, copying and pasting articles is usually a UA violation, because of copyright.

[daniedb]

Tyler, what are you even saying? This post is certainly going to be pulled, but you're just incomprehensible most of the time. I've said this in another pulled thread, but if you are trying to educate people, there's a difference between enlightening them and inflaming them. I would be halfway interested in what you had to say if you didn't include snarky faces, act like those who disagree with you are idiots and disavow ANY usefulness of allopathic medicine under ANY circumstance whatsoever.

[granolamomma]

Originally Posted by daniedb

Tyler, what are you even saying? This post is certainly going to be pulled, but you're just incomprehensible most of the time. I've said this in another pulled thread, but if you are trying to educate people, there's a difference between enlightening them and inflaming them. I would be halfway interested in what you had to say if you didn't include snarky faces, act like those who disagree with you are idiots and disavow ANY usefulness of allopathic medicine under ANY circumstance whatsoever.

I was just trying to say this exact thing but couldn't seem to word it properly.