Mothering › Forums › Breastfeeding › Lactivism › An Act Relative to Maternity Patients Rights
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

An Act Relative to Maternity Patients Rights  

post #1 of 15
Thread Starter 
Here is a link to proposed legislation in Massachusetts. :

http://www.mass.gov/legis/bills/hous...df/ht02257.pdf

An Act Relative to Maternity Patients Rights

Every maternity patient, at the time of admission, shall have the right to be informed and receive complete information and materials, support and counsel from an admitting hospital on all infant feeding choices.

When a maternity patient chooses a method of infant feeding, said choice shall be supported and counseled.

Health care providers and maternity patients shall have access to infant feeding materials and educational information, including, but not limited to, breast pumps, feeding supplies and bottles, infant formula samples and preparation instructions.

Further, sample formula and formula equipment shall be distributed to a breastfeeding maternity patient only when an individual physician order is written or on request of the maternity patient.

WHEREAS, scientific data demonstrates that breastfeeding is the best form of infant nutrition and provides certain health benefits for both mothers and children;

WHEREAS the Surgeon General and the American Academy of Pediatrics recommend that most babies be exclusively fed with breast milk for the first 6 months of life, and continue on with breast milk through the first year of life;

WHEREAS, the U.S. government’s Healthy People 2010 goals seek to increase
the percentage of women initiating breastfeeding to 75 percent and still continuing to breastfeed when their baby is six months of age to 50 percent;

WHEREAS, the effort to increase breastfeeding rates is a shared responsibility among government, family, community, workplace, healthcare professionals, and the public and private sectors;

WHEREAS, a mother’s decision about how she feeds her baby is personal and it is every mother’s right to choose the best feeding options for their babies and themselves, given their life circumstances;

WHEREAS, iron-fortified infant formula is a safe and recommended alternative to breast milk within the first twelve months of life.

The General Court hereby finds that it shall protect the ability of mothers to receive complete and balanced information on all infant feeding options available before giving birth, in the hospital and after leaving the hospital.

Further, the General Court finds it is every mother’s right to choose the best
feeding options for their babies and themselves.
post #2 of 15
Quote:
WHEREAS, scientific data demonstrates that breastfeeding is the best form of infant nutrition and provides certain health benefits for both mothers and children;
Quote:
WHEREAS, iron-fortified infant formula is a safe and recommended alternative to breast milk within the first twelve months of life.
They needed to read Diane Weissinger's Watch Your Language! I think there were some good intentions in this bill, but too heavy an acceptance of formula's role, as if it is equal. This is NOT a prescription for how to create a Baby Friendly Hospital!
post #3 of 15
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nisupulla View Post
Here is a link to proposed legislation in Massachusetts. :

http://www.mass.gov/legis/bills/hous...df/ht02257.pdf

An Act Relative to Maternity Patients Rights

Every maternity patient, at the time of admission, shall have the right to be informed and receive complete information and materials, support and counsel from an admitting hospital on all infant feeding choices.

When a maternity patient chooses a method of infant feeding, said choice shall be supported and counseled.

Health care providers and maternity patients shall have access to infant feeding materials and educational information, including, but not limited to, breast pumps, feeding supplies and bottles, infant formula samples and preparation instructions.

Further, sample formula and formula equipment shall be distributed to a breastfeeding maternity patient only when an individual physician order is written or on request of the maternity patient.

WHEREAS, scientific data demonstrates that breastfeeding is the best form of infant nutrition and provides certain health benefits for both mothers and children;

WHEREAS the Surgeon General and the American Academy of Pediatrics recommend that most babies be exclusively fed with breast milk for the first 6 months of life, and continue on with breast milk through the first year of life;

WHEREAS, the U.S. government’s Healthy People 2010 goals seek to increase
the percentage of women initiating breastfeeding to 75 percent and still continuing to breastfeed when their baby is six months of age to 50 percent;

WHEREAS, the effort to increase breastfeeding rates is a shared responsibility among government, family, community, workplace, healthcare professionals, and the public and private sectors;

WHEREAS, a mother’s decision about how she feeds her baby is personal and it is every mother’s right to choose the best feeding options for their babies and themselves, given their life circumstances;

WHEREAS, iron-fortified infant formula is a safe and recommended alternative to breast milk within the first twelve months of life.

The General Court hereby finds that it shall protect the ability of mothers to receive complete and balanced information on all infant feeding options available before giving birth, in the hospital and after leaving the hospital.

Further, the General Court finds it is every mother’s right to choose the best
feeding options for their babies and themselves.

i really like the first part i bolded, the second is very nice that they added in since most people dont knwo that, but will they say WHAT the benefits are, etc??

and i do think support for ff moms who CANT bf is nice, but :sigh: it does make it sound too much like a perfect other option
post #4 of 15
Hmmm...with some of the phrasing, I am wondering if this legislation was propsed by opponents to Ban the Bags trying to appease Ban the Bags supporters while still maintaining the foundation of ABM as the norm.
post #5 of 15
I think it's a bit of progress. Not as much as I'd like, but still a bit I think.
post #6 of 15
Who is the petitioner, Harriet Stanley?
post #7 of 15
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by kdabbler View Post
Who is the petitioner, Harriet Stanley?
Yes, from West Newbury. Why do you ask?
post #8 of 15
I agree with the poster above that they should aim for Baby Friendly status!

http://babyfriendlyusa.org/
post #9 of 15
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nisupulla View Post
Yes, from West Newbury. Why do you ask?
Sorry, I wasn't clear. I was wondering if she was a legislator or not. Just curious.
post #10 of 15
: Formula should NOT be distributed by hospitals. This is a HEALTH HAZARD to babies AND their mothers.

It's like giving post-heart attack patients Big Macs & fries their for hospital food :
post #11 of 15
Quote:
WHEREAS the Surgeon General and the American Academy of Pediatrics recommend that most babies be exclusively fed with breast milk for the first 6 months of life, and continue on with breast milk through the first year of life;
Also this part is incorrect. BFing is recommended AS LONG AS BOTH CHILD AND MOM WANT, not just the first year of life .
post #12 of 15
Quote:
Originally Posted by MaryJaneLouise View Post
Also this part is incorrect. BFing is recommended AS LONG AS BOTH CHILD AND MOM WANT, not just the first year of life .
That's right. The policy includes the words "NO UPPER LIMIT."


http://aappolicy.aappublications.org...rics;115/2/496
post #13 of 15
Thread Starter 
I thought maybe you knew something about Harriet Stanley and why she would be proposing this.

She is a legislator in the MA House.
post #14 of 15
This is a dreadful thing, I think. It really is a bill of rights for formula companies. No formula samples for moms who say they are breastfeeding, just for everyone else. It isn't the people who have already made up their minds who are at the greatest risk. This seems to be, as someone has said elsewhere, "ban the bags" backlash.

Does anyone know what the status of this is? Massachusetts has a bad history with attempts to get pro-breastfeeding legislation passed.
post #15 of 15
Quote:
Originally Posted by MaryJaneLouise View Post
: Formula should NOT be distributed by hospitals. This is a HEALTH HAZARD to babies AND their mothers.

It's like giving post-heart attack patients Big Macs & fries their for hospital food :
Thank you! EXACTLY what I was thinking!
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Lactivism
This thread is locked  
Mothering › Forums › Breastfeeding › Lactivism › An Act Relative to Maternity Patients Rights