Mothering › Mothering Discussion Forums › Pregnancy and Birth › Fertility › Family Planning › Going from 2 to 3 children?
New Posts  All Forums:
 

Going from 2 to 3 children? - Page 2

post #21 of 35
Thread Starter 
Thanks everyone! I am just getting back to this thread! HAHA!

We are still undecided....I think I may start another thread just to get something off my chest! I apprecitate all the honest comments.
post #22 of 35
Going from 1-2 was hardest for me.
post #23 of 35
For me it was easier. I became more zen. But... you'd have to change your username! I have 5 kids. Going from 1-2 was by far the hardest. And once you have 4, you don't even notice the difference!
post #24 of 35
The hardest thing was not having a hand for each child.

My kids are all about 2.5 years apart.
post #25 of 35
Like several other posters, going from 0 to 1 was the most difficult for us. #3 definitely means less down time for me, but not drive-you-over-the-edge craziness.

There are many small ways #3 is difficult for, for example:

When I had #2, #1 still took a nap each day, so I could potentially nap if they both slept at the same time. By #3 no one was napping, so I never got to take a nap during her newborn days.

Bedtime is a pain - all three kids need individual attention to get to sleep. There are only two (and often one) adults available, so one (or two) kids are running wild while I am trying to read to and brush teeth for a child - at the time of day when I have HAD IT and have trouble keeping my calm about me.

A wider age range means less chance of common abilities for the children, but they are no so far apart that they can be unsupervised. For example, I can't take #3 to baby-parent swim classes like I did #1. At the beach the older two want to go bogie boarding, but it is difficult for me to stay out in the deep water with them while holding #3 safely.

Overall, my DD is the easiest child - I am not sure how much is her personality and how much is my more relaxed attitude.
post #26 of 35
:
post #27 of 35
Good thread...Paddy will be 2 in August and Henri will be 1 in July. They are 11.5 months apart: But to be honest, they are not difficult children. Paddy has always been excellent about naps and bedtime, although we're having normal discipline issues right now ( don't push your baby brother over and make him cry, that's a nice gesture Paddy but please don't clean the toilet with your hands, etc...) My biggest concern right now is diapers Paddy is just beginning potty learning now, and while he shows every sign of readiness, it could be another year before he's totally potty learned, and then his brother would still be in diapers too. I cloth diaper, and having THREE kids in diapers would be insanity : But we love how close our boys are, and we feel there is room in our hearts for yet another. Breastfeeding is also a consideration with me. I fully intend to nurse for two years plus with Henri, and I dried up when I was pregnant with him by the 2nd trimester, so nursing him through the pregnancy could be a challenge. We also need a bigger car. We currently drive a 2 door Ford Focus and there is no way a third carseat is gonna fit in that thing
post #28 of 35
:

Thank you to the BTDT mamas who have provided so much insight. 0-1 was REALLY hard for me and 1-2 was a breeze. So I'm wondering if I would be due for another challenge with 3. My DH feels done so this might be a moot issue but I'm thinking hard on the possibility of having one more child and weighing the pros and cons. My first 2 are nearly 4 years apart and ideally the next two would be between 3 - 3.5 years apart.
post #29 of 35
Firstly, we have spirited, gifted children who have never slept , so it has been hard the whole time so far. They are 14 months and then 16 months apart with the 4th coming about 23 months after ds3; a close bunch. I have not had any consistent alone time for 4 years, or even time to work on my own pursuits, hoping that one day I will again. I think that is largely to do with the closeness of our children in age.

Relatively, ds3 was the easiest addition and now it's actually harder if one or two are away for an hour walking with daddy. I find that with three, they find many more ways to play than with only two. I am less required to set up play opportunities and can just observe more. Now, that said, I do still do much, much more than many other mums for set-up/facilitation because our children don't shut off, and sleep only 10 hours/day (the youngest has a 1 hr nap about three times/week in addition to that); ds1 and ds2 both quit napping altogether at 16 months and ds 1 only ever had one nap to begin with, for one hour (but that reduced his night sleep to nine hours, never longer than two-hour stretches : ).

I am on 'go' for 14 hours/day. The third was the easiest because he is very agreeable (with me because we have similar personalities- he is very challenging to dh though) and also very advanced so I have had less care-taking with him than even the others who were also very early with most physical (and all other) milestones. It has been enormously helpful that ds3 started walking at 8 months- that is VERY relieving. He was also sitting unassisted at 3 months, playing independently by then and started to say words to indicate needs just before four months old. I think it might have been harder if he had done these things at a more common time, but I don't have anything to compare with in my own experience.

By far, our most challenging infancy was ds1, so ds2 seemed easy by comparison and ds3 like he just came walking and talking out of the womb . I think the degree of easy vs. difficult that you experience will depend greatly on the child who is born and also on the dynamic of relationships in your family. Ds3's personality and characteristics have been instrumental in ds1 and ds2's bonding. He seems to have filled in the gap for them and it's been a wonderful blessing to watch their collective bond.

It's true about being out-numbered, but I have spent most of the time alone with the boys while dh works until recently, so I was outnumbered at ds2. That was the hardest transition for me.

I have also heard others say that it must be so hard to have ours so close together, but without a point of comparison, I just think it is what it is. For me, watching a friend with a 4 yr old and a newborn looked hard because the 4yr old can do pretty much everything on his own, or at least try (regardless of whether or not mum was aware or approving of what he was doing), whereas mine have all been still young enough that for most things, they had to ask me and then patiently wait until I could assist them. Now we'll have a 4 1/2 yr old with a newborn, but with two sons between and lots of experience for ds1, so I don't forsee that being a problem. Ds1 is naturally inclined to look to his brothers' needs and to desire to help me and has been increasingly helpful with each babe.

I think it's hard in some ways, whatever your situation, but in the end, it just is what it is, and you'll work together to make solutions to the dilemmas you find. If you are flexible and want this, you'll be fine. And even if you're not flexible, you'll find yourself being stretched in the ways that will allow everyone's needs to be met.

An aside- our former chiropractor told me that child #3 is the one she sees most frequently in [what she considers] large families because that's the one who falls off the change-table, bed, down the stairs, off the back of the couch, twists this and that etc... because of the typical desire to do everything the others are doing without yet the physical competence to participate. That is definitely true about our ds3 to an extent; the difference is that he actually acquired the ability to do things fairly evenly with his desire, so he's had very few accidents.

I am very long-worded, it seems. I tried to be as accurate as possible with my perceptions of our experiences thus far; I hope it's not off-putting.
post #30 of 35
Thanks for this interesting thread! Ours are 1 and almost 3 and we go back and forth on deciding if we want a third. I am pretty sure that we do except we are for sure waiting until DD is 2 to even consider TTC. We would like a 3-3.5 year age gap between #2 and #3 -- our first two are 21 months apart and whew, that is hard!

I think ideally we'd have 5 1/2, 3 1/2 and new baby.
post #31 of 35
#3 was easy here! (well, relatively : )

0-1 was hard, 1-2 was hard (they are almost exactly 2 years apart - I had trouble with having only a newborn and a spirited toddler). Dh was also getting his MBA at night during all this, which made him scarce.

#3 is 3.5 years younger than #2, and she just slipped into family life so much easier. It was great having someone to fetch a diaper or something so everything wasn't *totally* on me.

#4 was pretty much the same although she is close in age to #3 so it was back to having a newborn and toddler - this time the difference was I had a 7 and 5 year old to help a little, and they could be somewhat self sufficient in playing, etc. #3 and 4 are both horrible sleepers though (getting better...slooooowly) so that has been hard. I am "nasty mommy" when I don't get any sleep, esp. when pg.

#5 is due soon, I am hoping for an easy baby! A sleeper!

I think it really all depends on the age differences and personalities of the kids. That and what other things are going on in your life - like dh going back to school, family crises, etc.
post #32 of 35
I wanted to add that I was on the fence, but we have decided against #3. DH is about to deploy for 9 months, and has another deployment 12 months later, so if we TTC when he got home next year, that would leave me w/a 3 mo old, and I've done that already (had a tiny baby and a long deployment) so I know I don't want that again. That's one thing that stinks about the military, I feel that sometimes they dictate when we can plan children.

Add in that I'm in the 35 yr range, I think we are a no. I'm sad but not sad enough to want to TTC, KWIM? DH says no but would be on board if I *really* wanted a baby, since most of the childcare falls on me. (with him being gone so much).

I am very happy w/the two I have now, they are so much fun and we are able to do nearly everything with them at this point.
post #33 of 35
subbing...
post #34 of 35
We have 3. The first and second are 17 months apart. Then 23 months later no.#3.

0 to one is by far the hardest. Trying to figure everything out. But still keeping one foot in "adult w/o kid life"!

1 to 2~ you're much more relaxed and trust your own judgment. Its putting both feet completely into motherhood.

2 to 3~ outings are tough and the laundry is out of control. But its amazing to watch your little team play together. Its a self-made playgroup. I don't ever have to entertain just referee sometimes (ok, all the time).
post #35 of 35
2-3 has been a b$&*h.

1 & 2 are 26 months apart, and I think it's the 3.5 year gap that really threw me this time. It's not him, he's such an easy baby - it's the other two. They are wonderful spirited children, but they are a handful. Neither one naps anymore, and I seriously think that would be the key to my sucess. But the errands, the laundry... it's all really overwhelming right now. Granted baby is only 3.5 months old, but I wonder if it will get easier.

Everyone says that having four is nothing in comparison, but at this point I'm just too afraid to even think about any more.
New Posts  All Forums:
 
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Family Planning
Mothering › Mothering Discussion Forums › Pregnancy and Birth › Fertility › Family Planning › Going from 2 to 3 children?