Eek!:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...ml?nav=hptoc_c
and further:
What do y'all think about this?
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...ml?nav=hptoc_c
Quote:
| Every generation rewrites parental scripts. If power over their lives is the goal, some girls ask, why not use everything they've got, including their sexuality? Dressing provocatively doesn't necessarily mean they have sex; in fact, proportionately fewer girls are having intercourse in high school than a decade ago. But if they can attract male attention by wearing a furry creature profile, what's the harm? That's the argument Cassie makes to girlfriend Carolina Fojo, also 16, as they break from shopping for a snack in Montgomery Mall's food court. "I want guys to notice me," Cassie admits, while a few feet away a miniature carousel spins 3- and 4-year-olds around. "Once boys notice, they can get to know the real me." Which, she elaborates later, includes being a fierce field hockey goalie, a tutor in D.C. schools and a decent student. |
Quote:
| The friends agree on one point with sobering implications: The Playboy bunny attire found in the shops they frequent -- often pastel in color and modestly cut -- is tame compared with other provocations on the rack. When stores sell booty shorts, ultra low-rise jeans, high-rise thong underwear and tees saying "Juicy" or worse, "it's easy to dress skanky," Cassie says. She believes Playboy is classier. "Wearing the bunny achieves the same effect without needing to show a lot of skin." |










T This mall is maybe 5 minutes away from my house......just down the street on Democracy Boulevard from my birthing center! Ah, suburbia.
Uh huh.
:

: Funny how you have to pay someone to advertise for them...



