Mothering › Forums › Natural Family Living › Activism › Activism Archives › Playboy gear???
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Playboy gear???  

post #1 of 19
Thread Starter 
Eek!:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...ml?nav=hptoc_c

Quote:
Every generation rewrites parental scripts. If power over their lives is the goal, some girls ask, why not use everything they've got, including their sexuality? Dressing provocatively doesn't necessarily mean they have sex; in fact, proportionately fewer girls are having intercourse in high school than a decade ago. But if they can attract male attention by wearing a furry creature profile, what's the harm?

That's the argument Cassie makes to girlfriend Carolina Fojo, also 16, as they break from shopping for a snack in Montgomery Mall's food court. "I want guys to notice me," Cassie admits, while a few feet away a miniature carousel spins 3- and 4-year-olds around. "Once boys notice, they can get to know the real me." Which, she elaborates later, includes being a fierce field hockey goalie, a tutor in D.C. schools and a decent student.
and further:

Quote:
The friends agree on one point with sobering implications: The Playboy bunny attire found in the shops they frequent -- often pastel in color and modestly cut -- is tame compared with other provocations on the rack. When stores sell booty shorts, ultra low-rise jeans, high-rise thong underwear and tees saying "Juicy" or worse, "it's easy to dress skanky," Cassie says.

She believes Playboy is classier. "Wearing the bunny achieves the same effect without needing to show a lot of skin."
What do y'all think about this?
post #2 of 19
Quote:
She believes Playboy is classier. "Wearing the bunny achieves the same effect without needing to show a lot of skin.
I concur.. Most of the bunny stuff around here are babydoll tees, or tanktops....I think playboy is far less degrogatory towards women than a whole lot of the other girly magazines.. Regardless of the fact that they have naked women inside the mag, Playboy in general has a much more "wholesome" image...

I don't have a problem with it.. Not even for 16 yr old girls.. Just me though..

Warm squishy Feelings...

Dyan
post #3 of 19
Quote:
The rabbit, he continues, represents "the best of our sexuality. . . . It symbolizes personal and economic freedom for women, as well as men," and compared with the violent depiction of women in certain teenage music, it is "a breath of fresh air."
I also wanted to add i think this is right on.. It isn't about what a guy "Could" do to you.. He could do the same thing if you were completely covered head to toe.. Dressing anyway you choose is not a reason for anyone to disregard you as person..

Also i think 16 yr old girls are old enough and smart enough to follow their instincts when it comes to who they are, who they want to be, and how they want to get there.. They know which guys are just out for some "play" and which ones are going to be willing to learn about them.. At least i was at that age...

Ok.. All done..

Warm Squishy Feelings.. (again)

DYan
post #4 of 19
I think Hugh Hefner (and Christy Hefner) are admirable in many, many ways and I have zero criticism of Playboy magazine today or in the past. I don't care for the graphical edits/changes to women's bodies but all in all, I think it's a great magazine.

I also agree that the Playboy gear is more tasteful than much of the garb out there for teens to purchase and wear.

My confusion with teen girls using their beauty and sexuality for power comes from the huge amount of oral sex going on performed by girls without reciprocation. It seems that the female pleasure and orgasm are not getting any attention and that bums me out a lot.

In many ways, contemporary sexuality for girls seems good in terms of freedom from limiting self-identification (one can have sexual experiences with either gender, for example) but otoh, today's sexuality seems very retro and oppressive with the oral sex thing. I wish female pleasure and orgasm could get some (overdue) props and the power females are perhaps receiving from performing oral sex could be more of a mutual exchange, if that makes any sense.

But fine, if they want to wear Playboy gear, that's cool by me. Just wish female power could evolve to well deserved female sexual pleasures.
post #5 of 19

Y'all

I honestly hope my daughter doesn't 'want' to wear playboy gear. Perhaps that's not realistic *sigh*

I frankly don't like what the image of women in the media does to OUR young women. I see/hear of too many of us with low self esteems and or eating disorders etc... I think we need a revolution myself. Im ready to burn my f'n bra and stop shaving/showering ...

post #6 of 19
Thread Starter 
Quote:
but otoh, today's sexuality seems very retro and oppressive with the oral sex thing.
My concern is that it's "retro and oppressive" not merely with respect to oral sex (I've not heard about that, but I don't know anyone who's presently in high school so my info's almost totally absent) but also with respect to gender roles. The softcore, servile "bunny" concept is perhaps less disturbing than the "skank" approach, but it does remain disturbing. I don't think we're going to have teenage women who are empowered vis a vis their sexuality when the primary roles they're emulating are so submissive and servile. Perhaps I'm just out of touch (it would not surprise me). Anyone have any up-to-date info on this?
post #7 of 19
Quote:
Originally posted by Marlena
Anyone have any up-to-date info on this?
Sorry, I'm not understanding. What does 'this' refer to? The oral sex among teenagers today?
post #8 of 19
I dunno, the whole bunny thing seems tacky to me. Just another logo to slap on your body so you can be a walking billboard. I really don't have any problems with (most) porn or Playboy in general, but I wouldn't want my (hypothetical) daughter wearing Playboy gear any more than I would want her wearing Disney logo gear.

T This mall is maybe 5 minutes away from my house......just down the street on Democracy Boulevard from my birthing center! Ah, suburbia.
post #9 of 19
Quote:
... by Marlena
... The softcore, servile "bunny" concept is perhaps less disturbing than the "skank" approach, but it does remain disturbing. I don't think we're going to have teenage women who are empowered vis a vis their sexuality when the primary roles they're emulating are so submissive and servile ...
Uh huh. Yup.

Not quite understanding the rush to put "Playboy" up on pedestals as a "great magazine." Okay, so it's possibly a better quality product than hard core porn (but I haven't actually gotten within 10 feet of an issue in over a decade, so what do I know), but have women's standards of self-respect gotten so low that this is what's considered "classier"?

:
post #10 of 19
I've never seen anyone wearing bunny clothes...maybe this trend hasn't hit Charlottesville yet. I'm inclined to disapprove. What 16 year olds do, 12 year olds will want to copy. You'd be reviving me with smelling salts if my 10 year old dd appeared in playboy wear. And, as Marlena said, the implication of servility is disturbing.

What's wrong with looking brainy, yet cute? I don't think a bunnysuit implies brains. The girl in the article is described as a "decent student." Decent? Is that supposed to be good enough for our girls? I expect my own dds (ages 10 and 7) to be excellent students, and somehow, bunnywear doesn't fit in with that. Not that you can't be smart and sexy, of course, (smart is sexy, IMO) but at ds's middle school, where the fashions are similar to the high school's and many of the girls are physically mature, the smart girls do not dress provacatively.
post #11 of 19
This is an interesting topic. I have to agree that I don't like seeing the 'bunny' symbol on young people. But then, I don't like seeing "GAP" on a t-shirt either : Funny how you have to pay someone to advertise for them...
post #12 of 19
My take on kid clothes with bunny symbols is

I would not want my kid wearing them.
post #13 of 19
I am with Ms. Mom and others on this one.

Dh and I refuse to wear any article of clothing that advertises a brand name. Why would I pay to advertise for someone else?

I plan to pass this belief/perspective on to dd. I hope she agrees with it

And call me prude, but I do_not_like the sight of teenagers with the words "Juicy" written across their breasts or butts. I think girls can find better ways to access their "power".

~Deirdre
post #14 of 19
Quote:
Originally posted by Deirdre
[B]And call me prude, but I do_not_like the sight of teenagers with the words "Juicy" written across their breasts or butts. I think girls can find better ways to access their "power".
[B]
After being surrounded by a bevy of tarted-up HS'ers while waiting for my ice coffee this morning at the local Double D's, I sure wish more parents thought this way.

And I am at a loss as to how any young girl can think giving a guy a 'drive by' blow job is empowering. I sincerely doubt the recipient of said blow job feels that way, especially when he's yapping about the episode later with his pals.

Makes me think we should reconsider that convenent school in Connemara option for the wee one.
post #15 of 19
It doesn't matter what you are wearing if you are comfortable with yourself as who you are.. Even at 16... I did not stop being who i was when i would put on revealing clothing any more than i would become someone else if i took it off.. 16 yr old girls ARE trying to get boys to notice them because that's what teenage girls do.. Just as 16 yr old boys try to do other things to get 16 yr old girls to notice them.. Maybe it's just me, but when i was 16 I was always out, and I always had a boyfriend or a date... I wasn't overly popular or promiscuous (sp) but i did have a lot of fun..

Sexuality IS empowering.. Especially when it is your sexuality people are responding to.. Teenagers ARE sexual beings just as all of us are, and they feel the same desires to express that sexuality.. Just as some of us express ourselves more provocatively so do they...

I do think a lot of the stuff out there is acutely raunchy... I wouldn't wear it, but I'm not buying it.. And as for oral sex amongst the H.S. crowd.. Nothing new, just a bit more wide spread.. Perhaps we need to be telling our daughters that sexual gratification of one partner without the same gratification of the other partner is selfish and something to be considered.. However.. I don't, now nor have I ever, know any 16 yr old boy who when offered would turn a BJ down..

Society only has soo much influence on our children.. Just as we as parents only have so much influence on our children, and at 16 they should know how their parents feel about things.. At 16 your sexuality pulses and pounds through you.. I don't think a tiny bunny on a modestly cut T is changing who that 16 yr old girl is... I think it is just that girl trying to express herself sexually...

Just my (very long it would seem :LOL ) .02

Warm Squishy Feelings....

Dyan
post #16 of 19
ITA Nursing Mother.

The bunny clothes cross two lines for me. They are advertising a product and the are selling sex. No thanks. I feel myself getting pulled into the trap of wanting dd to always be cute and hip (which unfortunately means dressing her somewhat slutty - she is 6 by the way) and it is hard to resist. Thankfully we are homeschooling so the pressure isn't there as much. She has never said "I want this because it is what all the other kids are wearing" I can't imagine how bad it would be if she were in public school.

So no I don't think wearing a playbopy bunny is empoowering. I don't think sexual availability is empowering. I think that is a lie that the media has sold uoung women and they have bought it hoiook line and sinker.

Not so long ago (about a year I guess) we gathered the kids in our youth group and developed a dress code. The over riding theme from the guys side of the room was that they wished girls would cover up more. in thier words "Noone wants to see that. cover it up please"

Intresting that the playboy clothing is more modestly cut. Perhaps the folks at playboy aren't selling as many magazines since girls these days are giving it away for free. Maybe the figured if they covered girls up more and pointed more people to the magazine intrest would grow some more.
post #17 of 19

NM

Somebody mark the date and time. I TOTALLY AGREE with NM on this one.

quote:
We are dealing with that right now with our older dd. We have given her security, love, and great tools in dealing with her self-esteem issues, yet she finds herself craving and longing to be physically pleasing to her friends both boy and girl. My heart breaks at the moment as she stives to accept herself as the beautiful person that she is.

I curse this society and magazines like PB and other media like MTV and/or even magazines like Ms or Seventeen, where all the girls are beautiful, skinny or sexy.... and other sexed obsessed material that tend to give our young girls the idea that we can indeed "flaunt" our sexuality for power. My dd is smart, sensitive, talented, but thats not enough in her eyes. -quote
--------------------------------------------------------------------
I have a beautiful, wonderful daughter who is at times questioning her own worth based on appearance, and she is gorgeous by our society's standards. The really sick thing is that she is only 4. What the hell are we teaching our kids when appearance is the basis for personal power and self esteem?
post #18 of 19
Ah max...

No need to mark the time you agreed with NM...we are ALL here BECAUSE of our commitment to being the best parents we can be, right?...and to support one another as we walk that path. We have many different perspectives, ideas, and understandings born out of our personal experiences of life, but we all agree we want the best for our children. There is more in common than we all realize.

It was a real challenge to teach my dd and my both my ds-es to watch the experiences of their peers, and observe how those experiences felt to their peers in the longrun. It is hard to train kids to think critically about peer pressure stuff whether around sexuality or drugs or whatever. But the lessons gleaned from their peers experiences are valuable. (My dd's best friend is currently due with a baby out of wedlock, in Oct. The dad is a cokehead and very immature, wanted this girl to abort, was all about how this would ruin his life, etc.,...there has been ALOT to observe and consider in this unfolding, believe me.

But it can be successful. My dd is 20, (a virgin; not necessarily the best way, but is her way) who has had some boyfriends, very much enjoys partying with friends, also has some very healthy boundaries. I like to think that I and dh had something to do with the positives.

Max...daddies DO have alot to do with daughters' self esteem also, and I love how my dd and dh love each other. They have a great relationship....dads really have a wonderful and unique opportunity. Your dd is lucky to have you. My dad was a good human but had lots of issues and unfortunately, I did not have what my dd has with my dh...and your dd has in you, max. What a great opportunity to make a difference!

NM...I worked at school also...it is one thing that I will always be glad I did because it offered me insight and made me available to teachers and my kids and other kids too. I always try to remember how it felt to be a teen, never have shown disdain for or tried to minimize the emotional rollercoaster ride teens seem to be on. I take them seriously and have deep respect for that time in life. (At the same age as my dd is now, I was married for a couple years and had had a couple miscarriages.) I know what you mean about girls and what they go through often nowadays. It is heartbreaking sometimes, but that is just my observation.

My daughter is a fab beauty and built like ...well she could easily be a model. She dresses somewhat provocatively for evenings out if appropriate, but tastefully and modestly always, because she doesn't feel the need to look as other girls do locally...that skanky look just turns her off completely. And she thinks "mystery" and modesty is more attractive, really.

She is more sophisticated and her goals, while including marriage and children, also include feeding her mind with diverse experience. She has been to Europe already in her life so has a broader cultural experience. I am glad we were able to give her that. Her employer takes the whole staff on a trip annually. One year it was Europe, another, Vegas, another Hawaii. This year is the Atlantis resort in the Bahamas, I think it is. She will likely go on that trip.

She works in a rather sophisticated restaurant-resort atmosphere (and has since she was about 14 beginning as a busser and progressing through the ranks) so has developed professionalism in dress and experience with interacting with the adult public. She enjoys her work as a hostess and she is very, very good at her job. She would like to train as a bartender. (dubious work to some, perhaps, but pays well for a college student, and is work that can be found many, many places globally)

Much to her surprise, her peers seem to look up to her BECAUSE of her choices and confidence and sense of self. Like I said, it may be illusion and ego, but I do like to think that she was raised in a good way. I have really had to "fake it" that way, in raising her to do well with math and science, unlike me who flunked out and felt very inadequate alot in school like my mom.

Another issue is how boys are raised to see/value women. Let me say that my boys, who are really pretty much men now, seek out companionship with women who have minds to share. Now it's pretty rare hereabouts, but I don't expect either of them will stay here forever. It's tough for my boys to observe how girls conduct themselves with guys. How girls dress is part of that too.

I wonder if folks raise kids with any thought for those who will form relationships with them... whether sex partners, or life-partners, etc...or try to instill relationship skills and self esteem that help create success and happiness, and health in those things.

Anyhow...we all have our views and ways...but we all want what is healthy and good for our kids and their happiness. We all have much in common that way. The changes that must come about make this a more user-friendly society have to begin somewhere. I like to think that we are here doing just that...making the changes through our sharing and support of one another as we do our best. Our girls and boys need alot of support to become all that they are potentially capable of, and honoring one another's gender and sexuality is important. Discussion like this help to open the way.

I say let kids be children...sexual beings from birth, yes, but in innocence...long as they can in simplicity, because life gets very complex once they choose to include more adult attire and appearance.

Thanks for your time...Joyce in the mts.
post #19 of 19
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally posted by frogertgrl
Sorry, I'm not understanding. What does 'this' refer to? The oral sex among teenagers today?
Yes, the "this" was ambiguous. I was referring back to the quote "I don't think we're going to have teenage women who are empowered vis a vis their sexuality when the primary roles they're emulating are so submissive and servile." In that connection, I was wondering what gender roles tend to be like between teens of the opposite sex these days. I mean, I've read some recent Kaiser studies on the issue, but I have no present real world experience with which to gauge the studies.

What NM and others said was enlightening with respect to the issue.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Activism Archives
This thread is locked  
Mothering › Forums › Natural Family Living › Activism › Activism Archives › Playboy gear???