Hi everyone,
Can someone please explain the rationale for sitting and doing an activity on a mat for 3-6 classroom? I get that it develops a boundary for that child's work. But I question how necessart that physical boundary is and if it's too limiting, especially for a very physically active child. I think it simplifies for the adults the issues of sharing and grabbing, etc that are typical in 2 year olds, but does it also then unnecessarily limit some of the interaction between children that might be challenging at times, but also might serve as a learning platform.
Also, I think about how sitting at a desk in elementary limits learning for a lot of children, especially active ones. Wouldn't sitting on a mat be even more limiting for a 2 year old?
I don't mean to criticize, just want to understand, learn more and hear others' opinions of the pros and cons.
Thanks
Can someone please explain the rationale for sitting and doing an activity on a mat for 3-6 classroom? I get that it develops a boundary for that child's work. But I question how necessart that physical boundary is and if it's too limiting, especially for a very physically active child. I think it simplifies for the adults the issues of sharing and grabbing, etc that are typical in 2 year olds, but does it also then unnecessarily limit some of the interaction between children that might be challenging at times, but also might serve as a learning platform.
Also, I think about how sitting at a desk in elementary limits learning for a lot of children, especially active ones. Wouldn't sitting on a mat be even more limiting for a 2 year old?
I don't mean to criticize, just want to understand, learn more and hear others' opinions of the pros and cons.
Thanks








)...yet, they have THEIR place with THEIR work to go back to and finish. It's neat and orderly, and I like that. All children feel very strongly about not stepping on mats and others' work, thus learning respect and control for their, made easier by the physical and visual boundaries of the mat.