OK, I'll bite. A lot of people in my area homeschool for religious reasons, but we are devoutly secular. My 11 y.o. went to school through 2nd grade. He had wonderful K and 1st grade teachers. His 2nd grade teacher was clearly going through the motions, and even though my kid was the only one selected for their "gifted" program his teacher delighted in harassing him about the poor quality of his penmanship. To this day it's a struggle to get him to write anything down, and he doesn't know cursive. I figure as long as he can sign his name, he'll be OK. 
There was no particular trauma that led me to take him out of school. He was pretty well-adjusted socially. I started noticing, though, that when he came home he would tell me about books he'd read during lunch or the designated socialization time, i.e., "recess." Nothing about what he'd been taught by the teacher. He wasn't interested in sports, which meant he was hanging out on his own during recess. It didn't seem to bother him, but it got me to thinking: how exactly is he benefitting from this experience? His best learning was happening during the soft spots in the school day schedule. Why not make the whole day a soft spot?
Lucky for me, my life situation allowed me to homeschool him. A lot of people need public schools, and who knows? I may once again be one of them someday, but I sure hope not.
I think there is a big misconception that homeschoolers are trying to create "superior" or "advanced" children. Not true! Because we are relaxed homeschoolers (moving rapidly toward unschooling), I can guarantee that there are some subjects in which my son would likely test below grade level. There are other subjects that he's very well-versed in, having demonstrated a passion for learning more. As he grows older and I see the person he's becoming, it's clear to me that he needs fairly minimal instruction. I'm just there to assist as necessary. I have had absolutely no success in shoving it down his throat (although I still am guilty of it when it comes to certain subjects). When he feels a drive to learn something, he'll do it. I'm continually amazed by the things he knows that I had nothing to do with teaching him.
I'm not even going to respond to the socialization question. Why so many people see public school as a real social outlet really boggles my mind.
I don't care about getting him into college when he's sixteen. I don't care whether he ever learns to write cursive. I care about producing a well-adjusted, happy, self-sufficient and empathetic adult -- and public school is certainly not the only way to do that.
Read John Taylor Gatto and try running a few Google searches.

There was no particular trauma that led me to take him out of school. He was pretty well-adjusted socially. I started noticing, though, that when he came home he would tell me about books he'd read during lunch or the designated socialization time, i.e., "recess." Nothing about what he'd been taught by the teacher. He wasn't interested in sports, which meant he was hanging out on his own during recess. It didn't seem to bother him, but it got me to thinking: how exactly is he benefitting from this experience? His best learning was happening during the soft spots in the school day schedule. Why not make the whole day a soft spot?
Lucky for me, my life situation allowed me to homeschool him. A lot of people need public schools, and who knows? I may once again be one of them someday, but I sure hope not.
I think there is a big misconception that homeschoolers are trying to create "superior" or "advanced" children. Not true! Because we are relaxed homeschoolers (moving rapidly toward unschooling), I can guarantee that there are some subjects in which my son would likely test below grade level. There are other subjects that he's very well-versed in, having demonstrated a passion for learning more. As he grows older and I see the person he's becoming, it's clear to me that he needs fairly minimal instruction. I'm just there to assist as necessary. I have had absolutely no success in shoving it down his throat (although I still am guilty of it when it comes to certain subjects). When he feels a drive to learn something, he'll do it. I'm continually amazed by the things he knows that I had nothing to do with teaching him.
I'm not even going to respond to the socialization question. Why so many people see public school as a real social outlet really boggles my mind.
I don't care about getting him into college when he's sixteen. I don't care whether he ever learns to write cursive. I care about producing a well-adjusted, happy, self-sufficient and empathetic adult -- and public school is certainly not the only way to do that.
Read John Taylor Gatto and try running a few Google searches.






:
:


:

Follow Mothering