Quote:
Originally Posted by herbsmd 
I agree that people have had poor experiences with Waldorf schools--part of that, no doubt is because of the ideological differences. Having worked at other private schools (I have taught at another very prestigious private school in the same area which espouses no "esoteric science" behind the education itself), I know that one of the problems that private schools face is simply a general management issue--when someone pays a lot of money for something, they expect it to be done their own way. Often times, when people spend a lot of money on an education, they are looking for something that they have a certain amount of control over.
I don't disagree here, but I blame WALDORF for those ideological differences. Absolutely, we hear of many, many parents who believed they were getting something completely different when they signed up for Waldorf. Whose job is it to make it clear what they teach and more importantly, WHY? Waldorf schools claim to be something they are not, and refuse to acknowledge what they are - and that's where the problems come from. Over and over in the parent reviews, parents describe being duped. Often, they claim their school wasn't a "real" Waldorf school - still believing that there exists, somewhere, a school that actually fulfills the claims of Waldorf - producing bright, independent-thinking graduates, 94% or which go on to college. Can you please point me to the Waldorf school which has a college acceptance rate of 94% - as is advertised on AWSNA's website? Do the people who run Waldorf understand the meaning of FRAUD?
The real shame is that for every child who graduates Waldorf, a dozen or more have had their education interrupted by Waldorf's false promises. If Waldorf sold itself honestly, they would attract people who actually WANT "esoteric science" instead of fact-based science.
Quote:
We won't know how many of those transgressions on your website would be transgressions that are simply of the typical kind (whether or not they claim not to be about a financial/control issue or not) or which ones are simply unique to Waldorf education, so I would only like to include them insofar as we both agree to label them as entirely ad hominem. Though they might be true, there are too many factors involved to use them as much more than that for the sake of an argument. As a whole, however, I think there is something to be said for the "Waldorf-offended" group. And that is why I am here.
No, sorry, we're not going to brush off the experiences of hundreds of parents just like that... Waldorf has already done this - that's why this thread is here. Great way to try to invalidate people's experiences though. How about invalidating the 55 pages of comments on this thread while we're at it?
EVERY ONE of the complaints relates to Waldorf education - they are ALL about what happened in Waldorf schools. Sure, there are going to be many factors involved... again, they will relate to Waldorf, whether those factors are lack of accountability, poor governance, crazy teachers, elitism, child abuse and bullying, inattentive to special needs, poor reading/academics, and so forth. The reasons people cite are Waldorf problems. I didn't harvest reviews of people who were simply upset at the costs of the education. The reviews on my blog are valid and damaging to Waldorf and Waldorf needs to take them seriously.
Even if something like bullying is common in other schools, if there's a SPECIAL REASON for allowing it in Waldorf schools, we can't say - "look, bullying is everywhere".
Quote:
Some of what I read on your website undoubtedly gave me the shivers. This, in the greater context of all of the abhorrent things that unfortunately happen in schools (Five minutes before I came on here, I just finished reading an article of a teacher in California who has been spoon-feeding semen to students) we have to keep in mind that people who are not right in their own mind should never be teaching students.
This is a shameful tactic. Do they teach you this in Waldorf teacher training? In my day, it wasn't "spoon-feeding semen" - it was "girls giving blow-jobs in the hallway". Please... remember the thread you're on. Most of the readers here, I'm certain, have seen these types of Waldorf fear tactics used before. Waldorf should be SCREENING their teachers more carefully... instead, they pass problematic teachers from school to school. Since Waldorf teachers don't actually have a "revokable" credential, they just move between Waldorf schools.
Quote:
Some of the things that have happened on your website can only be explained (in my own mind) by the teacher being deficient in one or more faculties. Unfortunately, in Waldorf Schools and other private schools (Catholic Schools come directly to my mind as having this same nepotistic problem) there is a smaller inner community from which hiring takes place. That community, in my mind, is far too small and inherently nepotistic. This is certainly a problem of Waldorf education (and, as I said, other brands of private education).
It's sad that Waldorf needs to snuggle up to Catholic schools to find problems on the magnitude of their own. I agree, however, Waldorf's way of hiding problematic teachers within their system is indeed just like the Catholic church. Many of the priests in the Catholic church have been prosecuted. As I said, Waldorf can't even yank their teaching credential. More importantly, Waldorf EXCUSES this type of behavior... often publicly. Then they wonder why they have so many critics.
Follow Mothering