Maybe I understand. If you get pregnant after a tubal ligation, it's really important to check to see the location of the fetus because of the risk of tubal pregnancy. Sometimes the scar has a passage way that's big enough for a sperm to get through, but is in no way big enough for the egg to float down. Remember the biology class film that showed all the sperm wanting into the egg, and the difference in sizes? Also, the egg floats down on the current of the fallopean tubes, while the sperm has a tail for locomotion. If the egg can't get down after fertilization, the result is an ectopic pregnancy.
Some tubal methods are more likely to fail, some less likely. A single clip on each tube is more likely to fail than someone who had a clip on each end, the middle cut and then burned. A tubal done during a c-section on a 23 year old woman is more likely to fail than one done 5 years after baby on a 35 year old.
But, if the tubal had "failed" and the woman got pregnant with a uterine pregnancy, I'd assume it was failed on one side, at least. A dye test could help clear it out a little more, and tell how big the passage was.