http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/articl...NG43QJ3U11.DTL
The article is pretty good, but check out this gem from Dr. Laurence S. Baskin, chief of pediatric urology at UC San Francisco:
"I'm not going to buy the argument that it's brutal," Baskin said. "There's a general anesthetic involved, so they're not going to experience any pain, because they're asleep. And afterwards, with good nerve blocks, they basically do fine."
Baskin also dismissed the argument that circumcised men experience less sexual pleasure because of the loss of foreskin. "I think that's been pretty much debunked by a number of articles in the British Journal of Urology and the Journal of Urology." Regarding men who endeavor to restore their foreskin in their adult years -- Web sites are devoted to the practice -- Baskin said, "In my mind that would go under the heading, 'Get a life.' "
A general anesthetic? Debunked sensitivity issue? Get a life?
The article is pretty good, but check out this gem from Dr. Laurence S. Baskin, chief of pediatric urology at UC San Francisco:
"I'm not going to buy the argument that it's brutal," Baskin said. "There's a general anesthetic involved, so they're not going to experience any pain, because they're asleep. And afterwards, with good nerve blocks, they basically do fine."
Baskin also dismissed the argument that circumcised men experience less sexual pleasure because of the loss of foreskin. "I think that's been pretty much debunked by a number of articles in the British Journal of Urology and the Journal of Urology." Regarding men who endeavor to restore their foreskin in their adult years -- Web sites are devoted to the practice -- Baskin said, "In my mind that would go under the heading, 'Get a life.' "
A general anesthetic? Debunked sensitivity issue? Get a life?










