British women know the difference

[baybee]

http://findarticles.com/p/articles/m...ch/ai_54308894

Br Journal of Urology pub'd study of women's preferences in 1999. I believe the women were in their 40s or older but I'm not sure.

[bluetoes]

I have to say I agree with them. I feel sort of guilty to say this but I really feel sorry for circ'ed guys sometimes, many of them must suffer from a real inferiority complex even if completely unjustified in their particular case (gentle and good versus the jackhammer effect I have heard some describe). I can understand the psychology behind why they want to circ. not being able to admit what they lost.

[trmpetplaya]

My friends who have been with both agree wholeheartedly and have told me so repeatedly. Those who have been with both also all left their sons intact American women just have no idea what they're missing for the most part.

love and peace.

[baybee]

Ron Miller just let me know that this study is the O'hara study from the U.S.
and that it was pub'd in the Br. Journal of Urology but was not British. I assumed it was British by mistake. Sorry for that misinformation.

[mntnmom]

I really do believe that as our intact boys grow up, and more women have actually BEEN with an intact man (and as more dads are intact too) circ' with become the exception. Sex really is SOO different with a foreskin!

It makes me cry that so many little boys will suffer, and as men become a minority...but it gives me hope for the society my grandkids will live in! And for my daughter's & grand-daighter's sex lives!!

[Microsoap]

This may be TMI, but, I'm an intact (Canadian) gay male and have only been with one man, a circumcised (American) partner [his family is unique in the sense that their father is intact and so are the first two sons, then there's a circumcised son, him (circumcised) and a circumcised son] and wonder how this factors in into the mechanics of intercourse.

[emdeecee_sierra]

I found this article interesting in that DH and I have agreed to disagree on this subject, yet we do get into discussions on occasion and one of his "points" for anti-intactness is that women find intact less appealling (ok, he says they find it 'disgusting'... ). Anyway, good to know that this nugget of "information" that he has pulled out from who-knows-where is false. I always just counter with, "Look, if a woman is basing whether or not she's going to be with a man on his intactness or lack thereof, she's not someone you would want to be with anyway." Most especially considering the point in the relationship at which a woman would become privy to that knowledge, anyway.

[Islay]

Originally Posted by baybee

Ron Miller just let me know that this study is the O'hara study from the U.S.
and that it was pub'd in the Br. Journal of Urology but was not British. I assumed it was British by mistake. Sorry for that misinformation.

I must say I was surprised there would be a perceived need to carry out a study on British women's preferences - since most men are happy owners of foreskins here!

Christopher