Mothering › Forums › Parenting › my beautiful long haired...son?
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

my beautiful long haired...son? - Page 5  

post #81 of 95
Y'know....this is very interesting...

I still have pictures from when my oldest son, now almost 24 years old, was just 3 1/2 or so, with long ringlets...and you know, he didn't even know at that age that male humans could HAVE short hair!!!! ALL and I mean ALL the grown men in his life were long haired, bearded and beautiful.

One of my oldest and dearest friends' sons always had long, very long, beee-oo-tiful blonde hair and was he ever a gorgeous kid! I have not seen him in years. As he grew he really became quite handsome, very muscular and could do backflips from standing position....just an incredible strong body for a young kid. Haven't seen him since he was about 13 or maybe younger.

Both my sons were long haired by their own preference for many, many years before they chose to cut their hair. My oldest had very curly hair and was amazingly tolerant when I combed out the tangles after washing it...bless him. Today, at 24, he wears his hair very short but has a beard or sometimes just a goatee.

My younger son has VERY thick wavy blonde hair. When his hair is long, his ponytail is amazingly thick. He had a hard time keeping it from matting because it is so thick, in his last high school years, but kept it decent as he could. I cut it for the first time in years this past spring just before his graduation.

I am still the only one who cuts my boys hair....they are just cheap- and I have learned and developed pretty good haircutting skills over the years. I even buy the professional scissors for that purpose.

My daughter's hair is beautiful and thick and long and was ever since she was about 2- lucky her. For the first time in a very long time, she had her hair trimmed last summer professionally. My hair is long with some gray streaks. I don't use any color...except once I used henna, which was just for fun. My hubby and my daughter used to streak their hair odd colors (blue, plum, etc) together. At that time, my hubby was working doing direct care in a group home caring for low-functioning clients, so there was no real dress or appearance code. My daughter was probably in middle school to junior high at the time and just hungry to be unique.

We always supported our kids' decisions about their appearance, clothing, etc. It all can be changed, is temporary and they grow to prefer many ways of doing things before they settle, mature and really gel into their adult style. There's no harm in allowing boys long hair as babies or growing children or girls short hair, or even the shaving of heads. It all grows back or can be cut. (Though I admit to crying while cutting my sons' hair when it had been very long for a long time.)

For the record, my husband has always worn his hair long, except for desperate economic times when he had to try to get a quick job, where the length of his hair mattered to the boss during the interview. He has only shaven his face a couple of times in our 26 years together. His hair is currently long, graying and getting thin on top, but still in a ponytail and he is a professional person now: a teacher in an alternative highschool. No one seems to mind his style, nor questions his professionalism because of it.

In addition, let me remind folks that there was a time in our history when little boys (my recently deceased 90+ year old uncle Fred is one whose photo documentation I have in my possession) wore their hair very long and even wore dresses and ribbonsas tots. It was the way at that time. The photo I have is really wonderful of my recently deceased uncle, with a straw hat complete with ribbons, hair in long ringlets and he is wearing a dress, stockings and so on. It was a formal picture in the style of that time. He was the oldest of the 7 children. So this picture was very prized. I have come to find that he was not the only little boy of his time that was dressed that way for a formal picture. That was just the way. He may have been about 3 to 4, very young and they just didn't cut the boys' hair at that time. And this was a farming family.

Take a look at classic art and see, that like "Blue Boy" for example, which I think is a Gainesborough painting, boys were dressed very "fru-fru", in pastel colors, with satin sashes even if in breeches, with long hair, etc., quite often historically. (And there is Little Lord Fauntleroy- classic children's literature- a very poignant story.)

Like I said, my oldest son didn't even know that short hair was "the norm" for male people the first four years or so of his life. He sure doesn't seem scarred for life having spent so many of his formative years with long hair. And for myself, when I hit about 12 or so, I started having my extremely thick hair cut very short in summer because it was uncomfortable for me otherwise. That was my choice. My mom had very wavy, nearly kinky, thick hair and after a time, she cut hers and has worn it very short ever since.

I think we always honored our kids' free will about their hair...and we always said that if they could and chose to deal with all the repercussions of how they chose to look whether the norm or unique, it was okay with us.

Just because other folks are ignorant and wonder about or mistake the gender of your beloved child...don't take it too much to heart. Not everyone is lucky at guessing and it is often hard to tell when kids are very wee. And folks really are a reflection of the wider society in their sensibilities...and we don't all share the same sensibilities and yet we seem never to remember that fact on either side of this issue. There is NO right or wrong here, except where judgement takes hold. Let's just remember that we are all human, and can make an honest mistake or two. Of course also, there is that saying, "Never ASSUME...it makes as ASS out of U and ME." Remember that one? Just to say that you never really can depend on clothing or hair to signal visually anyone's gender, really, and that we can all afford to ask sincere questions, even awkwardly, instead of assuming. We can also afford to be kind when answering what may be an embarrassed if not ignorant question rather than take it to heart. We may never see that person inquiring about our child again so no harm done in the long run, eh?

And really no one holds the corner on correct, most caring, or right parenting. No one here or anywhere else can be the most wise parent, with advice or admonishment that works or applies to just everyone. We all have wondrously survived our own parents' childrearing "experiments" and all the phases and fads from Dr. Spock to Brazelton, even to Ezzo today... and some never cracked a book and did what came naturally (Like me ) .

Live, Love and Learn!

There I go again rambling...Joyce in the mts.
post #82 of 95

Ooooh, so emotional!

This thread has got some people rearing up, doesn't it?
While I love the discourse of philosophies, can I make a suggestion?

Joyce above there, I love your rambling! You sound so positive & shared your own personal experiencess as well as something to think about. You didn't down anybody, just shared your view.

Perhaps the reason *some* posters are getting such negative reactions is not the message, but the way its delivered...we all recognize we've got our own thoughts, but I figure the purpose of these boards is to enlighten? To see how vast varieties of people raise their babies & pick your own path.

When we post our OPINION as SCIENTIFIC FACT ( like the 4 legged animal 'theory' earlier, or suggesting you may be 'shortsighted and misguided' if you don't see 'basic biology')
I feel like it sounds contentious, as if you're talking down to your equals---which I hope is not what you wish to achieve here. I am guilty of such statements myself--but I AM trying to take a more open approach so as not to stifle with a one-sided viewpoint.

It's here that I really get a good mind-twist, thanks to everyone who posts ever!!!!
post #83 of 95

Re: Ooooh, so emotional!

Quote:
Originally posted by mountain

Perhaps the reason *some* posters are getting such negative reactions is not the message, but the way its delivered.

When we post our OPINION as SCIENTIFIC FACT ( like the 4 legged animal 'theory' earlier, or suggesting you may be 'shortsighted and misguided' if you don't see 'basic biology')
I'm not so sure it's always the "method of delivery" that gets people all hopped up. I think a lot of the time what does it is that people take someone else's statement of opinion as a personal attack on their different opinion. I have noticed that that happens A LOT around here (I have been reading these boards for a long, long time). If we want to have discussions about things more important and stimulating than TV and weather, we all have to recognize that just because someone disagrees with us and states their differing opinion, or tells us that they think we are flat-out wrong, it doesn't mean that they are bashing us, being disprespectful, or condemning our parenting. I happen to think that a lot of things people here do as parents are odd or far-our or unnecessary, but I also love the fact that the people who come here THINK about what they do ... and a lot of times in normal life that doesn't happen. People just go with the flow because it's the flow.

If we're going to be thoughtful in our parenting and talk about our choices, our choices will inevitably clash sometimes. That's ok! It doesn't mean someone always has to be right and someone always has to be wrong, and it DOESN'T mean that someone is being persoanlly attacked. I think people get too sensitive around here.

That said, I was the person who posted the 4-legged animal theory. In my own defense, I'd like to say that it is indeed scientific fact that human brains are deductive, not inductive. We start at the top and work down, categorizing and stereotyping as we go. That's just "basic biology." The point of my post was to answer the question "Why do people assume that anyone with long hair is a girl?" To me, the most basic reason is because that's how we're biologically set up. I wasn't defending stereotypes (as I tried to make clear), I was just answering the basic question of "why."

Wilma
post #84 of 95

Re: Re: Ooooh, so emotional!

Quote:
Originally posted by BunnysMomma
We start at the top and work down, categorizing and stereotyping as we go. That's just "basic biology." The point of my post was to answer the question "Why do people assume that anyone with long hair is a girl?" To me, the most basic reason is because that's how we're biologically set up.
If someone's experience is that most long-haired people turn out to be female, then that would explain an initial reaction of the word "girl" popping into your head when you first see the (long-haired) person. However, before the phrase "what a cute little girl" actually comes out of your mouth, the advanced human brain has a chance, and has the ability, to do some conscious thinking and re-evaluation. If you are aware that short hair on males is not an innate characteristic, or that *SOME* males have long hair, you should be able to question your original assumption before you stick your foot in your mouth. I don't think the question at hand is "why do people initially assume it's a girl" -- I think in our culture it's forgivable and defensible to have that initial reaction -- I think the question at hand is "why do people *continue* to *insist* that it *must* be a girl?"
post #85 of 95

I can't stop laughing!

SBF, ITA that it is a learned behavior to assume that someone w/ long hair is a girl...I believe there are biological aspects of gender that don't need to apply at an introductory meeting!

Bunnysmama, don't take this as a flame, I love the conversation, just feel like we need to look at both sides of the nature/nurture here...I really feel like it wouldn't end the world if we approached a baby/child as a beautiful person, not a gender. For what purpose would we need to deduct? We're not going to date that particular baby, are we? ITA that humans classify. but we are thinking beings who can decide when we've gone too far (that is my hope for the world, anyway ) By always placing people in categories, I think we dehumanize them (e.g. you're a female, you're OCD, you're depressed, you're republican, you're an INTP) Of course, for medical and scientific purposes, some info would be valuable to classify....but here we are talking about the annoyance it causes when someone calls your kid a girl b/c he has long hair. The easiest solution seems to keep your comments open-ended in all situations, keep your eyes open & you will figure it out soon enough---sneak up on them in the bathroom, maybe lol
post #86 of 95

Re: Re: Re: Ooooh, so emotional!

Quote:
Originally posted by SBFmommy
I think the question at hand is "why do people *continue* to *insist* that it *must* be a girl?"
Because not everyone is as enlightened as you are, clearly.

I didn't take your post as a flame, mountain, but I am curious as to whether you and SBF actually read what I wrote. Nowhere did I say that stereotyping is fine and that we should all run amok stereotyping one another with wild abandon. As I have now stated (I believe) 3 times, the question I was trying to answer is "Why do people ASSUME that those with long hair are girls?" Someone somewhere on this thread asked that question. I gave my answer to it. We organize our world by deduction. So most people form mental templates that say, "Long hair=girl." I don't know why some people say rude things or seem unable to understand that not all long-haired people are girls. I never said that we can't rise above our gut reactions.

I am guilty of claiming that even though I am totally aware of the fact that some guys have long hair, I won't be changing my basic assumption that long hair=girl. But that doesn't mean that I will rudely accost long-haired boys and taunt them about their hair.

I forget why the OP even started this thread, but I'm surpised it's taken 5 pages to hash out. I guess I just approach situations with an "oh, well" attitude so I don't get bunged up about other people and what they say and do.

Wilma
post #87 of 95
Yes, I have actually read everything you have written, and I still don't understand why you insist on assuming that people with long hair are female. When you know that there are long haired males, it is not a justifiable assumption. Hair length is not an accurate method of determining a person's sex, so you should not judge someone's sex based on their hair length. It's that simple.
post #88 of 95
BunnysMomma, FWIW, *I* understand EXACTLY what you're saying. I understood it the first time you posted it; I don't know why some people don't understand it after you've explained it three times.

Maybe everyone in the world should stop talking to each other at all. That way, there would be no chance of offending anyone.
post #89 of 95
Wow. I didn't realize this thread had taken a more "dramatic" turn. I missed that somehow.

Nobody has crossed any boundaries yet, but can I ask y'all to please try to be civil? If anyone posts something that you find offensive, just PM me and I'll look into it and see if any regs are being broken.

**********************

Taking off my mod hat...

Bunny'sMama, I also totally understand you and know that you are correct. I obviously read too many science books, lol.

When DD was younger she always got called a boy. I could have cared less because honestly, at that age it's hard to tell and I was never into frilly stuff.

And personally, I like short hair. I always find long-haired girls look really unkempt and it seems to just get in their way. Often it's a mother with an "overly-frilly" sense of what looks "pretty". Well, that's my own admittedly biased opinion, lol. I think some boys look really cute with long hair. But I'm afraid I'll probably still call them girls, in the absence of any other information. Though I would certainly never argue about being corrected, lol!

I trim DD's hair regularly. Right now she has a chin length "bob" with short bangs. I've worn my hair very short for years now and am only just now growing it out. It's almost down past my ears and I consider that long, lol.
post #90 of 95
I let my boy's hair be long cause I like it and so do they ! Plain and simple ! It's CUTE ! And I don't plan to cut it ! So I guess I don't see why some people think we have or need a reason beyond that. I asked my boys what they think of their long hair the other day and the fact that some people think they are girls, and my oldest (age 7) summed it up beautifully: He said, "I LOVE my hair long and I don't give a f*ck what other people say about it !" I loved that response (yes, even with the swear word !) and told him so, cause it sums up my opinion on the whole thing too !
post #91 of 95
Quote:
Originally posted by Shann
"I LOVE my hair long and I don't give a f*ck what other people say about it !"
:LOL

Yeah, I'd say that's pretty succinct!
post #92 of 95
My 2 1/2 yr old daughter has never had a haircut becayse her hair has not grown long enough to need one yet.

People often assume she's a boy when she's wearing a sweatshirt and jeans. I try to dress her in nice "girly" clothes so that people will know but it never fails, the one day I have her in "neutral" type clothes people automatically assume she is a boy and tell me how handsome he is. I just smile and say thank you because I figure at least they are saying he's attractive.

Oh, and to tell you the truth, I look at my sweet little girl sometimes and I can see how they mistake her for a boy. I don't get upset about it but I try to make SURE a child is a boy or a girl before I speak to others. If I'm not sure, I ask.
post #93 of 95
I have an idea that I’m not sure if anyone mentioned…when people are skeptical about your son’s sex, just offer to “prove” it to ‘em! KIDDING!
post #94 of 95
GENDER is a biological construct.
How we let GENDER affect our thinking is a SOCIETAL construct.

IMO, of course I've got those magic science degrees but they only go so far...


As a mother with a son who chooses to have long hair, I would ask that anyone who wants to classify him as a 'girl', due to whatever overwhelming urge, just to be kind...if you feel the need to form those assumptions in your brain--please don't VOCALIZE your gender assumptions, you may learn something you didn't expect...

I totally love this discussion, and the fact that it's so long, because it's not just about hair--it IS emotional. After re-reading everyone's posts, I realized my decisions to let my kids decide what to do with his hair is fueled by my mother's insistence that I HAVE long hair! I hated it, the brushing & snarls. So I do let my kids decide & when they're old enough, to take care of it themselves. My son decided at 4 to cut his hair, & we did. Now he wants it long again...and I just hope the world is enlightened enough to treat him like a human & not make him feel like he should have his hair a certain length so that people can classify him correctly. I think we should have pink, purple, blue, long short, spiked, mohawked, anything!
If you think about it, hair has been the source of warmth, assertion, reflection of society's standards (or breaking out of them), reflection of wealth (to have that $80 cut), reflection of disdain for wealth (e.g. dreadlocks, the shags)...My nephew had dreadlocks when he was 4 & you should have seen people's reaction! My own instinct was to brush his hair, but I KEPT THAT TO MYSELF! Imagine that! I did that out of my respect for him to keep his hair whatever way he sees fit...
I feel like that's what this is all about--respect for other humans * I think we can agree on that
post #95 of 95
I know this may be off topic but I always used the word “sex” as the simple biological distinction between male and female and “gender” as identity defined by the individual and/or the expectations based on a persons “sex” according to society and culture.

"Long hair = Girl" is a cultural distinction, not a biological distinction.

I also find this discussion interesting. What I find so strange, OP is some people’s reaction when you correct them after they assume that your son is, in fact, a boy. How strange that they would react that way. Maybe they fear that you are doing some strange sociological experiment on them.

Anyway, I love long hair on all children. I would probably be one to verbalize what sex I thought your child was only because our language sometimes makes it hard NOT to make that distinction. For instance, if we were at the park together and your son was playing and I wanted to ask you something about *him* I would probably reach for a pronoun, which are gendered in English.

BUT, I would never, ever question YOU once you corrected me.

My daughter has her hair cut short *because it makes my life easier* and 80% of the time people assume she’s a boy. Personally, I don’t care. I WOULD care if they questioned my authority about the sex of my own child.

I’ve always love androgynous looking people so I probably take it as a compliment when people ask if my daughter is a boy.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Parenting
This thread is locked  
Mothering › Forums › Parenting › my beautiful long haired...son?