My ped is pretty good, and b/c she mentioned vaxes w/o assuming we'd be doing them, and is cool w/ us whatever we choose, we'll be keeping her. But she's said a few wonky things about bfing, and the practice (which has several peds and an LC) has these handouts of info for each stage of growth-- and the bfing info is pretty bad. It starts off well but then seems to think all babies should feed every 3-4 hrs (except for an "occasional 'growth day'"--ha, try several-day growth spurt for my dd!) and anything else is snacking and should be discouraged, including if a baby "seems" to want to nurse more often while colicky at night-- it says to "follow this schedule:" ten minutes one side, 5 minutes burping, 10 min other side, 5 burping-- and to not feed more often than every two hours!
So these are basically good people-- I think they really do encourage bfing as the norm and have good info on intact penile care, and even their lame sleep advice one ped posted on their website I think is meant as a way to discourage parents from doing extreem or early cio (but still, blech). They emphasize it being impossible to spoil a baby and to hold them a lot-- so I really want to get some changes in there about bfing, and not just ditch them.
SO-- help me help them by pointing me to any authorities they are likely to find compelling that argue against scheduling feedings like that. Wasn't there something about babies setting their own schedules? Just the idea that there's this one-size-fits-all and don't respond to cues idea gets me mad! I want to adress that. dd's healthy and gaining just right and I feed her all the time. I'm scared to think what might have happened to her if I'd followed this advice... what about reverse-cycling babes? might not they eat frequently in the evening when reunited w/ mom? help me brainstorm any more points... I welcome any help you can give me. I have looked at the aap statement on bfing and bm but it didn't seem to say much for beyond the first week or two, and this advice is for 2 wks-2months I think. I know they link to LLL on their site so they must respect it enough to refer people there, so that's really all I have so far.
TIA!!
So these are basically good people-- I think they really do encourage bfing as the norm and have good info on intact penile care, and even their lame sleep advice one ped posted on their website I think is meant as a way to discourage parents from doing extreem or early cio (but still, blech). They emphasize it being impossible to spoil a baby and to hold them a lot-- so I really want to get some changes in there about bfing, and not just ditch them.
SO-- help me help them by pointing me to any authorities they are likely to find compelling that argue against scheduling feedings like that. Wasn't there something about babies setting their own schedules? Just the idea that there's this one-size-fits-all and don't respond to cues idea gets me mad! I want to adress that. dd's healthy and gaining just right and I feed her all the time. I'm scared to think what might have happened to her if I'd followed this advice... what about reverse-cycling babes? might not they eat frequently in the evening when reunited w/ mom? help me brainstorm any more points... I welcome any help you can give me. I have looked at the aap statement on bfing and bm but it didn't seem to say much for beyond the first week or two, and this advice is for 2 wks-2months I think. I know they link to LLL on their site so they must respect it enough to refer people there, so that's really all I have so far.
TIA!!








:
I think the quote from Katherine Dettwyler, PhD in Momtwice's siggy is a good one too and quite fitting.
Scroll down.