Mothering › Forums › Breastfeeding › Lactivism › PA Public Breastfeeding Bill Final Passage
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

PA Public Breastfeeding Bill Final Passage  

post #1 of 30
Thread Starter 
Well, it is over. In considering SB 34, the Pennsylvania public breastfeeding bill, Representative Leach moved to have the House consider the bill without Representative Joseph's amendment. The amendment would have added a legal remedy for those who are injured by someone violating the law. Sadly, Representative Josephs agreed to have SB 34 voted on without her amendment, though she said on the House floor that she would return if there were continued incidents of harassment. The PA House of Representatives then voted unanimously to pass SB 34.

The text of the bill, which the governor has already agreed to sign, is as follows:

WHEREAS, There are benefits to the child, the mother and society by encouraging and enabling mothers to breastfeed their children; and WHEREAS, An infant who is breastfed receives protection against infection, illness and allergies, and long-term positive effects on the development, intelligence and health of breastfed children have been found; and
WHEREAS, A protective effect against various types of cancer and greater emotional and physical health are found for mothers who breastfeed; and
WHEREAS, Breastfeeding promotes sufficient birth spacing, improved vaccine effectiveness and decreased food and medical expenses, which all have positive societal effects; and
WHEREAS, The Pennsylvania Supplemental Food Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) promotes breastfeeding education and support; and
WHEREAS, Legislation to clarify the right to breastfeed is necessary to promote breastfeeding and remove any stumbling block from influencing a mother's decision to breastfeed or continue breastfeeding.

The General Assembly of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania hereby enacts as follows:
Section 1. This act shall be known and may be cited as the Freedom to Breastfeed Act.
Section 2. Declaration of policy.
The General Assembly finds that breastfeeding a baby is an important and basic act of nurturing that must be protected in the interests of maternal and child health and family values.
Section 3. General rule.
A mother shall be permitted to breastfeed her child in any location, public or private, where the mother and child are otherwise authorized to be present, irrespective of whether or not the mother's breast is covered during or incidental to the breastfeeding.
Right 4. freedom to breastfeed.
The act of breastfeeding shall not be considered:
(1) Indecent exposure as defined in 18 Pa.C.S. § 3127 (relating to indecent exposure).
(2) Open lewdness as defined in 18 Pa.C. Section 5901
(relating to open lewdness).
(3) Obscenity or sexual conduct as defined in 18 Pa.C.S.
§ 5903 (relating to obscene and other sexual materials and
performances).
(4) A nuisance as defined in 18 Pa.C.S. § 6504 (relating
to public nuisances).
Section 10. Effective date.
This act shall take effect immediately.

_______________________________
Unfortunately, this bill does not change the legal status of breastfeeding mothers in Pennsylvania. Hopefully, it will draw much needed attention to the needs of breastfeeding women and their children.

Specifically, this law does not change the right of the owner of a public accommodation, a store or restaurant, to withdraw a woman's authorization to be there. If he does that, she can be arrested for trespass.

As before, women who are harassed should be sure they are being asked to leave by the owner or person in the highest level of management in a space because only that person can withdraw her right to be there. A waitress or store clerk is not authorized to turn a woman into a trespasser. Police can only arrest for trespass if instructed to do so by the owner of the space.

The section of the bill relating to obscenity crimes also does not change Pennsylvania law. The definition of crimes can only be changed by amending the crimes code, which this law does not do. However, no woman in Pennsylvania has ever been arrested for an obscenity offense while breastfeeding so this is not something a breastfeeding woman should fear.

Now, as always, public breastfeeding is NOT illegal. No action can legally be taken against a breastfeeding woman unless and until her authorization to be in a space has been withdrawn by the owner.

Thank you all for fighting so hard for a stronger law. I will continue to advocate on behalf of women who are harassed and will collect these stories so that we can return to the legislature in a future session.

Jake Marcus
j.a.marcus@comcast.net
post #2 of 30
.
post #3 of 30
Thanks so much for all the information and working so hard on this.

I'm disappointed to see that the amendemant wasn't included, but at least it's a start. Maybe one day it'll make it there.
post #4 of 30
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by SPOpa View Post
I know you're disappointed, Jake, but I have to say, this is progress. Yes, our rights may not be as strongly impacted as we'd hoped, but there is *something* on the books that we can point to.

Thank you for your tireless work. I am sorry that our legislature did not enact a stronger Bill, but I am hopeful that this one will be strenghtened in the future.

This is a good thing! We are getting somewhere.

"I was taught that the way of progress is neither swift nor easy ..." - Marie Curie.
I see the argument. Sadly, I foresee that in PA as in other states women will be waving a piece of paper while they are surrounded by security. It is not that this bill does too little. It is that this bill does absolutely nothing. With the exception of raising public awareness, which I do value highly, this bill does not change Pennsylvania law in any way. Instead it will lull PA women into a false sense of security and make them MORE vulnerable when they assert a right they don't have and put themselves at risk of arrest because they think that they can't be arrested. I have talked to too many weeping women. Being surrounded and yelled at while you have a child at the breast is violent and abusive, and now, still legal.

I do appreciate your thoughts. I wish this was an issue where one could get some of what one wanted, then come back and fight for more. But it just isn't. You can either breastfeed without fear of arrest or you can't.

On a weird sort of bright side - and believe me I am looking for one - more women are vocal about incidents of harassment in states with laws so we can return well armed.

Thanks for your support

Yours,
Jake, gearing up to do months worth of laundry
post #5 of 30
Jake,

again, thank you so much for all the work you've done.

Abby
post #6 of 30
I left a msg a few hours ago on Rep. Leach's voicemail. Can I call him back now & give him a piece of my mind?

Jake, you have worked so hard. Thank you.

Sus
post #7 of 30
Thanks for your hard work and for sharing this with us.

Quote:
Specifically, this law does not change the right of the owner of a public accommodation, a store or restaurant, to withdraw a woman's authorization to be there. If he does that, she can be arrested for trespass.

As before, women who are harassed should be sure they are being asked to leave by the owner or person in the highest level of management in a space because only that person can withdraw her right to be there. A waitress or store clerk is not authorized to turn a woman into a trespasser. Police can only arrest for trespass if instructed to do so by the owner of the space.
Does the law clarify whether breastfeeding = trespass? I just wonder what the conversation will be like if a bus. owner calls the police to arrest a "trespasser" and the officer shows up asking questions to find out what trespass has taken place. "She wasn't accused of being a trespasser til she fed her baby... but the law protects her right to feed her baby here... so how can she be deemed trespassing?"
post #8 of 30
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by velcromom View Post
Thanks for your hard work and for sharing this with us.



Does the law clarify whether breastfeeding = trespass? I just wonder what the conversation will be like if a bus. owner calls the police to arrest a "trespasser" and the officer shows up asking questions to find out what trespass has taken place. "She wasn't accused of being a trespasser til she fed her baby... but the law protects her right to feed her baby here... so how can she be deemed trespassing?"
I am really glad you asked this question because I know this is really confusing. When you walk into a store/restaurant/mall, any private property open to the public, you are an "invitee." You have been invited in. Any time the owner wants to, for any reason not otherwise forbidden by law (removal on the basis of race is specifically forbidden by law), the owner can say you are no longer invited. Then you are a trespasser. You don't have to do or say anything. You can have blue eyes. You can be a much despised brother-in-law. You can be the fifth person to enter and the owner just hates the number five. The owner needs no reason. You are now a trespasser. The only thing the owner has to say to the police is, "I want this person to leave." If you don't leave, you can be arrested and charged with trespass. When you are some place you are no longer invited to be, you are a trespasser. It is a state of being. Refusing to leave is a crime.

Unless the breastfeeding law explicitly overrules the property law, as in states in which the law says "notwithstanding any other provision of law" like Delaware, New York, and others, the rights of the property owner is not overruled by the breastfeeding law.

I know this stuff is hard. I have been trying to explain it to legislators for months. American law is founded on the absolute rights of property owners. That right can not be limited except by very specific law.

The controversial Elitch Garden incident in Colorado a few weeks ago is a perfect example. She was a trespasser under Colorado law, despite a "right to breastfeed" law. If she had not stopped, she would have legally been arrested and charged with trespass.

Hope that helps. Women really need to understand this.

Jake
post #9 of 30
Jake~ thanks for your work on this!! it really is a shame that it went down like this. I'm happy to hear Babette is willing to revisit this though- at least we have that for the future. And the public awareness this "law" brings about is a positive step. sigh.
post #10 of 30
My Representative called me at 9PM and talked to me about the Bill. He said he voted for it when he didn't. He voted against it on the 28th. The one thing that I found strange is he told me that Gov. Rendell wouldn't sign the Bill if it had the amendment in it? Does anyone know if this is true?

I was shocked to even get a call, but I did let him know that I am disappointed that the Bill didn't go through with the amendment. I feel good that I was at least heard.
post #11 of 30
What about nursing OUTSIDE? Like on a bench on the street?

Jake, thanks for your tireless work.
post #12 of 30
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jes View Post
My Representative called me at 9PM and talked to me about the Bill. He said he voted for it when he didn't. He voted against it on the 28th. The one thing that I found strange is he told me that Gov. Rendell wouldn't sign the Bill if it had the amendment in it? Does anyone know if this is true?

I was shocked to even get a call, but I did let him know that I am disappointed that the Bill didn't go through with the amendment. I feel good that I was at least heard.
I have never heard anyone say Rendell wouldn't have signed it with the amendment. That is just crap. Really, how much faith can you put in the word of a Rep. who misrepresents to you how he voted?

NO ONE, no legislator, no business owner, ever voiced opposition to the content of the amendment. House members who opposed it said they did so out of fear the bill would not make it through the Senate with the amendment. However, NO Senator ever spoke against the content of the amendment. Every time we called senators about it, they didn't even know about it and weren't going to care about it until it was back in the senate, which now it never will be.

Jake
post #13 of 30
Thanks for the clarification, that really is a crummy loophole and I understand why the amendment is so important. It seems that legislation adopted by other states is similarly lacking in teeth. Do any of the other states have a law that can actually be enforced through legal consequences? Looking through them at http://www.ncsl.org/programs/health/breast50.html it seems they all stop at "wherever the mother is otherwise authorized to be" and then ironically leave it up to bus. owners to provide that authorization.
post #14 of 30
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by velcromom View Post
Thanks for the clarification, that really is a crummy loophole and I understand why the amendment is so important. It seems that legislation adopted by other states is similarly lacking in teeth. Do any of the other states have a law that can actually be enforced through legal consequences? Looking through them at http://www.ncsl.org/programs/health/breast50.html it seems they all stop at "wherever the mother is otherwise authorized to be" and then ironically leave it up to bus. owners to provide that authorization.

Take a look at my Mothering article. Arizona, Connecticutt, Hawaii, Illinois, Louisiana, New Jersey, and Vermont all have legal remedies for violation of their public breastfeeding laws. Some others, like Delaware and New York, have the "notwithstanding any other provision of law" language or are part of the statute regulating discrimination by owners of public accomodations so that in those states women can not be made trespassers (and the police can not be involved), even if they don't have any legal remedy for harassment.

The NCSL site is not a good place to go to find accurate information about the laws. The best site is http://llli.org/Law/LawBills.html .

Hope that helps.

Jake
post #15 of 30
Considering that Rendell was the Mayor of Philadelphia when the city ordinance that protects NIP was passed, I highly doubt he wouldn't sign SB 34 with or without the amendment in place. He's known to be very women's rights friendly.
post #16 of 30
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by sedalbj View Post
What about nursing OUTSIDE? Like on a bench on the street?

Jake, thanks for your tireless work.
Good question. In truly public space, like streets and parks, you are governed by municipal law. Technically the only law that might be used against you is some sort of public indecency or nuisance law. Many states have laws clarifying that breastfeeding is exempt from these laws, though as I mentioned before this has to be done by amending the crimes code which the bill in PA doesn't do. I write about this in my Mothering article. As a practical matter, I don't know of any cases where a woman has been charged with any of these offenses. Obscenity and breastfeeding has come up in non-public contexts - like the bizarre case in Texas a few years ago where a mom was charged with child pornography for being photographed breastfeeding her one year old. So I can't say it would never happen but it is highly unlikely.

Thank you so much for all your personal support everyone. I can't tell you how much it keeps me going. My kids are all weaned (after a total of 8 1/2 years of public, private, tandem, and serial nursing) and I can't have any more, so it is really important for me to know I am doing what breastfeeding moms want me to do.

Love,
Jake
post #17 of 30
I just want to thank Jake for working so hard for all babies in PA. Thanks so much for being the best source of clear information on this topic, and for your MANY kind words. Your determination and quest for justice is so inspiring.
- Maggie B.

and will continue to do so anywhere my baby wants to eat!
post #18 of 30
Quote:
Originally Posted by mamajake View Post
Thank you so much for all your personal support everyone. I can't tell you how much it keeps me going. My kids are all weaned (after a total of 8 1/2 years of public, private, tandem, and serial nursing) and I can't have any more, so it is really important for me to know I am doing what breastfeeding moms want me to do.

Love,
Jake
Thanks Jake !!
post #19 of 30
I just came here looking for this because my rep emailed me. She said she was proud to vote yes but it without the amendment I do feel that it's a step in the right direction however the fact that the owner of a business can still have you removed because of this is disheartening. I have a question though- if you are asked to leave based purely on the fact that you are breastfeeding, do we not have the rights to fight it because it IS discrimination? I mean, if a person is going to have a BFing mom removed they NEED to remove EVERY SINGLE bottle feeding mother as well OR it's discrimination. I realize that bottle feeding mothers aren't potentially exposing breast BUT BFing moms don't really expose that much skin nor should THAT be an issue. Both BFing and bottle feeding are forms of feeding a child and if one is cause for removal than the other should be as well.

I understand what was passed I'm just confused on a discrimination stand point. I understand that with the way it's written business owners still have the right to revoke the authority to be there BUT don't they have to have a legitimate reason? Isn't revoking the authority to be there because of breastfeeding (but not bottle feeding) discrimination?
post #20 of 30
Quote:
Originally Posted by velcromom View Post
Thanks for the clarification, that really is a crummy loophole and I understand why the amendment is so important. It seems that legislation adopted by other states is similarly lacking in teeth. Do any of the other states have a law that can actually be enforced through legal consequences? Looking through them at http://www.ncsl.org/programs/health/breast50.html it seems they all stop at "wherever the mother is otherwise authorized to be" and then ironically leave it up to bus. owners to provide that authorization.
In Puerto Rico, if you are harassed while bfing, the harasser is fined, plus you can sue them.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Lactivism
This thread is locked  
Mothering › Forums › Breastfeeding › Lactivism › PA Public Breastfeeding Bill Final Passage