or Connect
Mothering › Mothering Forums › Natural Living › The Mindful Home › What is a reasonably sized house?
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

What is a reasonably sized house? - Page 5

post #81 of 106
Quote:
Originally Posted by olliepop View Post
Our friends and family don't understand why we're not upgrading to bigger digs and definitely can't comprehend why we're buying such an old house. It has so much character, as does the neighborhood we're moving to. Everything is within walking distance, tons of mom and pop shops, parks, library, etc. Right now we have to drive to everything, even to the park to ride bikes. The most important reason for moving is the fantastic school system. People don't understand why we're even thinking about high school now b/c our children are "only" 7 months and 4 years old.
Congratulations! It sounds awesome! I too prefer an older home with character. And I agree that 1300 sq ft is perfect for a family of 4.
post #82 of 106
Quote:
Originally Posted by momuveight2B View Post
To me a reasonable size home is one we can support on one income or less that way we have more time together as a family and the freedom to pursue other interests.
That's why I love our house.

That said, I wouldn't mind ONE or ideally two more rooms. Our house is 1200sqft plus a basement and while the layout is okay, I wish it were just a little bigger.
post #83 of 106
We're in 920 sq ft/ 2bed 1 bath (no basement, garage is the family business so no outside storage) for three of us, and I could go smaller. We're trying for a second child and with a family of four, it will be just right, I think. The big concern for me is if we have a girl next time around, we'd need to come up with separate space for the two kids (DS is, of course, a boy) as they grow. In that case, the size of our house wouldn't be so much at issue as the layout - we'd need an extra bedroom.
post #84 of 106
I think it's difficult to quantify "ideal living space" in terms of square footage alone. In terms of comfort, I agree with all those who said it's about layout, not square footage. A poorly designed 2000 square foot home can feel small, and a well designed 1000 square foot home can feel large.

Also, environmental impact is not always tied to square footage, and I think a lot of people overlook this. A brand-new 1200 square foot house that is built by a subdivision developer on recently razed land and that requires a driving commute to get anywhere can easily have a greater environmental impact than a 2000 square foot historic home that has been recycled through multiple generations and is within walking distance of everything. Even a 3000 square foot can have minimal environmental impact if it's a straw bale home with solar power.
post #85 of 106
Threads like this always makes me crazy!! :

I have NO idea how big the houses you are talking about is. Here in Norway we don`t use squarefeet, we use squaremeters... Does anyone know of a place online where I can get help to translate?

My home is extremely small. 1 bedroom, 1 tiny bathroom, 1 livingroom/kitchen in one. The livingroompart is so small there is barely room for my couch, a chair and a tv.

It`s 32 squaremeters.
post #86 of 106
post #87 of 106
Quote:
Originally Posted by CrunchyTamara View Post
Threads like this always makes me crazy!! :

I have NO idea how big the houses you are talking about is. Here in Norway we don`t use squarefeet, we use squaremeters... Does anyone know of a place online where I can get help to translate?

My home is extremely small. 1 bedroom, 1 tiny bathroom, 1 livingroom/kitchen in one. The livingroompart is so small there is barely room for my couch, a chair and a tv.

It`s 32 squaremeters.
To get a ballpark estimate you can just take off the last number (works better with smaller places). When I need a specific one I go to google & write ____ square feet = square meters.

I know my 100 sq meter apartment is 1076 sqare feet, and the 140 sq meter apartment I am buying is 1500 sq feet.
post #88 of 106
We live in just over 1700 sf. and are a family of 6. I'm pretty sure it's too small, but I love our neighborhood and prices have gone up so much in our area that moving would mean almost doubling our mortgage and I'm not sure I'm willing to do that right now. We might add on in the future as an alternative. I think if our kitchen was configured differently where you could have a table in there and I could turn the dining room into a playroom it thing would be a world better .
post #89 of 106
We're three (soon to be four) people in a three bed/one bath house - just under 1000 square feet.

I think it will continue to be fine for the four of us, but if we plan on having even one more dc, it won't work - we'll need more bedroom space.

Mostly because dp and I have separate rooms. He has severe sleep apnea, and no one can bear to even be on the same floor as him when he's sleeping (he's been relegated to the basement bedroom).

This time next year, we'll be adding a second toilet/sink to the laundry room downstairs.
post #90 of 106
Thank you!!

Then I will have to say that 344 squarefeet is a little on the small side for me and my son. (6 YO) But just a little. An extra bedroom would make it perfect. So, 450 squarefeet or so would be just perfect!
post #91 of 106
Our apartment is 800sf. There are 5 of us (girls 13 & 9, boy 11, DH and myself). Two bedrooms. It is hard. But our main problems are that we have too much stuff and I have no organizational skills. I almost hate being at home because it is too overwhelming. So I avoid it as much as possible. But that is not the way I want to live. The thing is, until I get the unnecessary stuff out and learn how to organize, even if we had a larger place it would still be crowded and junky.
post #92 of 106
Quote:
Originally Posted by Juliacat View Post
I firmly believe, as most people in this forum do, that the trend of giant houses even as families grow smaller is ridiculous. I firmly believe that a smaller house, a smaller mortgage or rent payment, less stuff, and more simplicity leads to a happier, more fulfilling life.
I totally agree with that.
I've often stated that myself.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Juliacat View Post
But I still think my house is too small.
Our house is 680 square feet with three people living in it--sometimes four when my mom is here, and would be four if we were to have another kid. If I could have whatever I wanted, I would want a house similar to this one but at least 800 square feet.
I even think 1500 wouldn't be completely unreasonable.
How many square feet per person do you think is reasonable for a house?
Our home is ~840 sq ft home with two bedrooms and one bath-
for 4, sometimes 5 people
and 5 pets: one 60# dog, two cats and two birds
(which, of course, includes the dog kennel, cat beds, cat scratcher, and two large bird cages).
Therefore, I believe number and type/size of pets is an important factor, as well.
Our home is essentially 3 living areas (including the 2 bedrooms) plus one bathroom.

1) We cosleep with our two daughters, so would just need a slighly larger bedroom than we have now for sleeping purposes.
At some point, years down the road, they'll share a room.

2) My 10 yr stepson is here often and regularly.
He currently resides in our 2nd bedroom which he graciously shares with the cats and dog (and all their stuff)
and is where I keep my extra kid toys, photos, a computer, our files, etc (I guess an office, as it is).

3) Our living/kitchen/dining room is a total of 13 ft by ~ 25 ft.
It seems far too small considering the dining area is in the kitchen and houses our two birds' cages and our dining table with four chairs.
It's very hard to maneuver around the table to access my birds' cages for maintenance purposes and to interact with them (as in let them in and out).
A loveseat is the visual separator of the kitchen/dining from our living/entry.
Our living room contains two loveseats, two chairs, a computer desk, an entertainment center (that holds our tv, vcr, dvd, diapers, books and baby toys), and the floor is covered by toys, pillows and blankets most of the time.

*We have one large bathroom that includes a washer and dryer.*

Considering our setup, I think our home is far too small and I really wish, not for more stuff, but just more space for the little bit of stuff we do have.
If I were to guess, I'd say ~200 sq foot per person.
In our case, that would be a 1000 sq foot home.
Pets are a different matter, depending on their requirements.
I believe my pets require a total of 30 sq feet for their housing/feeding needs to be properly fulfilled.
This of course, is exluding any potential future yard/outdoor space.

Hobbies are another factor.
Some people may wish for a hobby/craft room for all to share, creating a need for another 100 sq ft (a 10 by 10 room).
And for gardeners, a greenhouse would be a lovely addition.

So for me, my ideal home would be between 1200 and 1400 sq foot.
post #93 of 106
I would like a well organized home that was about 1500 square ft. I'd like lots of closets for storage definitely.
post #94 of 106
1200-1500 is perfect for 4 we are 3 in an 840 with no garage. it is tight.
post #95 of 106
Our house burned down so we are rebuilding right now. We did have 1150 on a basement, but now will have 1750 on a 1150 basement. We wanted to upgrade as we did not plan on kids when we built and upstairs only had 2 bedrooms(1 moderate size 15x12 and one small 10x10). Currently we have 2 kids and plan for 4-6. I honestly wish that we had only made half a basement before, but we have it now. We only had 1 room finished before and now will not have anything finished. The only thing downstairs is mechanical stuff in-hotwater heater, c/h/a, breaker box. The basement will hopefully be finished in about 10 years when we have more and older kids and a need for more bedrooms.

We expanded the upstairs to add 1 more bedroom- so one for us (although the kids still sleep with us) and one for boys and girls. We made a great room; instead of a very, very small dining room we had(where we couldn't even invite company over) and pretty small living room. We expanded the kitchen as well as I spend a lot of time in there and now will have a pantry and laundry area, before I didn't have any cabinet or closet for sheets and covers. For the most part though I don't store a lot of things. I think if I don't have the room then I don't need the stuff and I definitely do not like to use the basement to store a bunch of crap.
post #96 of 106
Quote:
Originally Posted by crunchy_mama View Post
For the most part though I don't store a lot of things. I think if I don't have the room then I don't need the stuff and I definitely do not like to use the basement to store a bunch of crap.
First I want to say congratulations on being able to rebuild your home.
That must have been a very difficult, traumatic experience.

I also hate to store things (other than photos) because I think it's too easy to collect crap.
We like to freecycle, but not enough people are picking things up from us.
If I had more/any storage, I know it would be much worse and we'd have even more unused crap.
post #97 of 106
It is all about layout. We are moving from a completely open cabin (about 1600 sq. ft total I guess) to a 150 yo house (with not one closet) but so says the realtor it is 2000 sq. ft. I don't believe this for a second. We need to get rid of literally 1/2 our furniture. It's 2-3 bedrooms (tiny) 1 bath, 1 living room, one dining room. I'm loving it though. Like the scale, I'm not interested in #'s. Closets to me are only an excuse to shove unwanted things in . We have maybe 1/2 of an armoire of clothes that actually need hanging, none of the kids clothes needs hanging. A coat closet might be nice, but not a big deal.

For our family of 4, 3 bdrs. were wanted. My 7 yo dd is a collector of tiny things and likes to make up hours of stories with them. My 4 yo ds is a destroyer and will tear through a room like a tornado. My dd rarely sleeps in her own room (ironically she usually likes to sleep w/said destoyer) but she gets VERY anxious if she does not have a safe closed place for her things.
post #98 of 106
Quote:
Originally Posted by vermontgirl View Post
We just bought a 1700 square foot house. It is VERY reasonably sized. In fact, I consider it to be small and cozy.

Anything under 1000 square feet for a family sounds unreasonably small to me. We are moving from a 750 square foot apartment to our new house. It will be quite the change. I have been feeling a bit cramped.
That's what we have, about 1700 sq feet, 3 bedrooms. And there are only 3 of us. But, we may have another child, I want to get a dog, we like to have people stay over, an dh uses one of the bedrooms for a home office.
For me a bigger space does not = more clutter. I like having the extra open space.
post #99 of 106
Quote:
Originally Posted by OakBerry View Post
For me a bigger space does not = more clutter. I like having the extra open space.
I like extra open space, too.
And it's true more space doesn't necessarily = more clutter.
Sometimes more storage = more clutter, though.
All those tiny nooks and crannies to stuff things away in and forget about.
post #100 of 106
Our house is 2100 square feet and I love it. It is just enough room to have a lot of people over and still feel comfortable. I know that is not usually a requirement, but we do have large groups over for bbq's (40-50) and since it rains sometimes, people are inside a lot.

Three bedrooms means one parent room, one boy room and one girl room if we have 3-4 children.

Two bathrooms means quicker showering because they can both run at once, and the opportunity to use the toilet while someone is showering or taking a bath in the other bathroom.

We only have one dining area. I think a dining room seperate from where you have a kitchen table and chairs is silly.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: The Mindful Home
Mothering › Mothering Forums › Natural Living › The Mindful Home › What is a reasonably sized house?