Ya, there was no point to that whole thing with the forced hetero-sex (plot-wise) other than a cheap "laugh."
I am having mixed feelings about this season thus far... next episode looks like it is going to annoy me. Nancy is now "owned" by this guy and has to do whatever errands he wants her to do and is forced into doing a table dance for entertainment of his clients? Were the writer's like, hey, "how can we force Nancy into scenerios she wouldn't naturally be involved in because of how we wrote her personality? ... I know, she'll be an indentured servant!" Why does she or Conrad even owe this guy? Thug logic? I think this plot-line is really stupid frankly, and am only watching at this point to see what happens when Silas meets Mary-Kate Olsen's character.
I am having mixed feelings about this season thus far... next episode looks like it is going to annoy me. Nancy is now "owned" by this guy and has to do whatever errands he wants her to do and is forced into doing a table dance for entertainment of his clients? Were the writer's like, hey, "how can we force Nancy into scenerios she wouldn't naturally be involved in because of how we wrote her personality? ... I know, she'll be an indentured servant!" Why does she or Conrad even owe this guy? Thug logic? I think this plot-line is really stupid frankly, and am only watching at this point to see what happens when Silas meets Mary-Kate Olsen's character.






:

Follow Mothering