birthright
I couldn't vote accurately (needed a 'dh has kilts and wears them' option); Being of the Burns clan, I wear them (trad and Utilikilt). But, dw and dd express dismay and raise such Cain I have yet to wear mine in public in our hometown with any regularity. The one time I snuck out of the house with the utilikilt on, I ran into a construction guy wearing his outside the coffee place. We enjoyed a manly embrace and a loud barbaric yawp, posed for a cellphone photo and dw was mortified when it appeared in the local rag. I find it hilarious and enjoy taunting them. At my brother's place, they relent, if only a little so I've done most of my public kilt-wearing out there. I'm vertically challenged (5-6) and have the legs from years of mountaineering and climbing but alas, my belly (I have the gut-cut in my Utilikilts) from 10 years of SAHD and a writer's sedentarism doesn't give me quite the confidence a reduced belly might bring to me. Surfing and futbol refereeing, disappointingly, has kept the legs toned but just doesn't seem to have made a dent in the spare tire.

:
That being said, kilt wearing is more about the footwear (and in trad kilts, the claymore). I've found I've gotten better reactions (in my brother's hometown) when wearing combat boots than when wearing Birks with a kilt. I'm inclined to agree. The taller upper of the boot emphasizes the massiveness of the sturdy muscled leg, be a man short or tall. Long hair helps too (for some reason I cut mine off when I had kids... hmmm). I do have a photo on the Utilikilt site, thanks to my SIL. Thank the gods for her Finnish boldness. My middle eastern dw doesn't get it, bless her.