Mothering › Forums › Breastfeeding › Lactivism › "breastfeeding is the biological norm"
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

"breastfeeding is the biological norm"  

post #1 of 19
Thread Starter 
can you mamas please educate me as to where this phrase originated? also, i've gathered (from reading on here) that it represents a change in how BF is conceptualized...

moving from "breast is best" (BTW, is this basically taken from LLLI's point about BF being the "superior" feeding method??) to the "biological norm" idea is supposed to promote BF as natural and normal rather than the better of two valid options. is that basically correct? so in a sense, the argument here is that calling BF "superior" rather than simply normal still begs a comparison to FF and sort of makes FF seem legitimate, if inferior?

i'm trying to get a handle on this because i'm doing some academic research into breastfeeding and feminism and want to think more about the move from "breast is best" to the "biological norm" idea. please educate me, both on the ideas here and on their respective sources. thanks!
post #2 of 19
I don't know about the origin of biological norm but would perhaps point out that our tits are within perfect eye range for a new born and exactly (most of the time) the right distance for an umbilical cord to stretch. A new born infant knows instinctualy how to root for food... so it is built into the biology of mother and child.

I imagine your thoughts about why the switch in language is correct... have you seen these?

http://breastcrawl.org/

http://www.lalecheleague.org.nz/docu...er_article.pdf
post #3 of 19
Well I first read that phrase in a fairly recent Mothering magazine. There was a short article (half page?) called "Watch your Language" which was about what you just said. Breastfeeding is not superior, its normal.
post #4 of 19
I thought it originated with alegna!
post #5 of 19
Quote:
Originally Posted by rmzbm View Post
I thought it originated with alegna!
post #6 of 19
I don't know where the phrase originated, but it's the truth. If formula and bottles were the biological norm, bottles and Similac would grow out of us instead of breasts and breastmilk.
post #7 of 19
Most humans don't expect to be or do the absolute best in what we do. We expect to be good enough, average or even quite good but not realy the best. We don't however want or expect to be inferior either. When we say that "Breast is best" there is an impression that formula is "good enough" but breast is that next level. Over and above what the average person does. There is also an impression of some sort of extra effort needed to become the best as there is in forinstance becomeing the best dancer or fastest runner or whatever.

When we express breastfeeding as the norm, than formula by comparison becomes inferior.
post #8 of 19
sorry i can't help on the origin of the phrase, but in so many ways this became apparent to me while i was pregnant. my nipples became enormous and so dark - gigantic targets for little blurry eyes i remember being so fascinated when i read (maybe in one of Ina May's books? can't recall....) that if you lay a brand newborn on its mamas belly that it can actually sort of wiggle/crawl up the belly to find the breast.

i do agree that it's helpful to place it in those terms, vs. seeing it as a superior choice... looking at it as a choice is what needs to change, IMO.
post #9 of 19
Quote:
Originally Posted by pixiepunk View Post
i remember being so fascinated when i read (maybe in one of Ina May's books? can't recall....) that if you lay a brand newborn on its mamas belly that it can actually sort of wiggle/crawl up the belly to find the breast.
Video of the fascinating breast crawl, for those of you who actually want to see it.

I think the origin of the term "biological norm" arose from different places simultaneously, because the concept is pretty self-evident when you think about it. I remember using the term before I ever read it or heard anyone else using it, and I'm sure that's the case for many people around the world.

The reason why it's important to mention "biological" norm is because the social norm is bottle-feeding. The social norm has so much influence in how society perceives breastfeeding that it's important to remind people that biologically, we were destined for breast milk, not formula. This is the way it is in all mammals (and actually, what defines us as mammals). People don't ever question a kitten suckling from its mama, yet people give breastfeeding women a hard time. Ridiculous, if you ask me.
post #10 of 19
I don't know if the phrase originated with Diane Wiessinger, but her article "Watch Your Language" is a great read on the subject...

http://www.lalecheleague.org.nz/docu...er_article.pdf
post #11 of 19
I always saw this phrase as pertaining to our immune systems and our bodies in general. Mammals have their immune systems strengthaned by receiving milk from their mothers. We are not quite complete in that sense if we do not receive our mother's milk. That is not to say that adopted children or whoever has not breastfed is "less" than a breastfed baby. I am just biologically speaking here; that our immune systems and things like that are meant to be brought to their full potential, in part, by being breastfed.
post #12 of 19
Here's a link to an interesting thesis on bfing and mass communications, includes some feminist thoughts:

http://etd.lsu.edu/docs/available/et...han_thesis.pdf
post #13 of 19
Besides the scientific data backing it up as posted, breastfeeding IS the biological norm because that's what was designed, biologically, to feed human babies. It's a no brainer, really. : Cows are meant to drink milk from their mother's udders, monkey babies survive by being fed milk from the human body, and yes, breast IS best. Formula is "good enough" , and does result in happy and healthy babies when the breast is truly not available. I'm sorry if that offends people, but in fact, it's the truth. Breast is the norm, and it is superior to formula; there is not argument there. Formula is the next best thing to expressed breastmilk, and if a mother has tried to breastfeed and can't, that's what it's there for. I don't think that any mother should feel as though she failed her child if she cannot breastfeed, and my statements aren't meant as such at all. However, biologically and nutritionally, breastmilk is the norm. It's why females were made with breasts, because mother nature intended for human babies to drink human breastmilk. Where no formula is available, mothers breastfeed. It's quite simple.
post #14 of 19
mamabear - thanks so much for that video!
post #15 of 19
Quote:
Originally Posted by angelpie545 View Post
Besides the scientific data backing it up as posted, breastfeeding IS the biological norm because that's what was designed, biologically, to feed human babies. It's a no brainer, really. : Cows are meant to drink milk from their mother's udders, monkey babies survive by being fed milk from the human body, and yes, breast IS best. Formula is "good enough" , and does result in happy and healthy babies when the breast is truly not available. I'm sorry if that offends people, but in fact, it's the truth. Breast is the norm, and it is superior to formula; there is not argument there. Formula is the next best thing to expressed breastmilk, and if a mother has tried to breastfeed and can't, that's what it's there for. I don't think that any mother should feel as though she failed her child if she cannot breastfeed, and my statements aren't meant as such at all. However, biologically and nutritionally, breastmilk is the norm. It's why females were made with breasts, because mother nature intended for human babies to drink human breastmilk. Where no formula is available, mothers breastfeed. It's quite simple.
Great post!
post #16 of 19
Quote:
Originally Posted by pixiepunk View Post
mamabear - thanks so much for that video!
You are very welcome.
post #17 of 19
I think you might be referring to Kathy Dettwyler's (also a LLLL) research at the department of Anthropology at Texas A&M? Her book, Breastfeeding: Biocultural Perspectives was originally published in 1995.

Here's her website with some of her articles: http://www.kathydettwyler.org/dettwyler.html#comments

Laurel
post #18 of 19
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by angelpie545 View Post
Besides the scientific data backing it up as posted, breastfeeding IS the biological norm because that's what was designed, biologically, to feed human babies. It's a no brainer, really. :
just to clarify--i was not disputing the accuracy of the statement or asking for evidence of its truth. i already believe BFing is most biologically appropriate, and yes, i agree that should be obvious. i'm just interested in studying the evolution of the language of BF advocacy/lactivism, particularly the transition from "breast is best" to "breastfeeding is the biological norm." it's really a question of rhetoric that i'm interested in.

thanks for the link to the thesis and the dettwyler reference. those are the kinds of things i was after
post #19 of 19
You're welcome!
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Lactivism
This thread is locked  
Mothering › Forums › Breastfeeding › Lactivism › "breastfeeding is the biological norm"