Quote:
Originally Posted by carmel23 
If I had seen the kids in the car, you would have a broken window--I wouldn't have hesitated to break the window and get the kids out.
|
That would be criminal destruction of property, possibly kidnapping, would risk traumatizing the kids, and I just don't understand it. It's also a near complete waste of time and energy to protect other people's safe as houses children. We could fight for children's lives who are in actual danger. I understand the children of Darfur are suffering.
If there is no danger of climate issues and I want you to tell me why a stranger gets to pick that I can't choose some far-fetched risk for my children of being in the car rather than the far-fetched risk of being in or on the way to the 7-11 during, say, a holdup or mugging or a car careening through the lot and crashing into the plate glass window. What child is easier to snatch, the child following me out to the car or the child locked and buckled inside? Child snatchings are fantastically rare outside of the family.
I doubt anyone could defend criminal charge in that situation with "But your honor she left them in the car." Or the civil suit. Even if it's a misdemeanor for the mom to leave her kids in the car. Not unless there was some actual danger to protect the children from. Not the bogeyman, not what if clouds suddenly darkened the clear blue sky and a lightning strike felled the tree next to the car and crushed it. Actual danger.
If there's a law that says my babysitter has to be 12, and I leave my sleeping kids with a trusted 11 year old and cross the street for coffee, you are not allowed to break down my door and carry them to some place you choose.
Follow Mothering