Quote:
Originally Posted by maureen73 
Please don't think I am being negative but I just felt this was one time I had to respond to a previous post with my opinion because I hear it all too often and not everyone has the same reason for being in this situation. Thanks ladies for listening.
|
I don't think you're being negative at all, I think you're being realistic. C-sections were INVENTED for situations such as yours, and I don't think for one minute that you made the wrong decision or that your cs was unnecessary. Unfortunately, stories like yours are in the minority. I've attended over two dozen births in the hospital, with at least 1/4 of them by section, and not one of those sections was truly necessary and life-saving. I'm sorry your medical issues preclude the possibility of having a natural labor and birth, but I'm thankful that medical science exists to help you and your children survive situations when your grandmother and mother did not.
As for the OP, my midwives and my Bradley instructor told me that research has shown that a normal primary gestation, when allowed to spontaneously go into labor, lasts 41w1d. Many OBs consider 40w1d to be "overdue" and a reason for induction. Personally, I was 41w4d and DH was 42w3d so I'm not expecting to go into labor early. As others have said, some women "cook" babies faster than others, and I don't like using dates and timelines because it gives women false expectations. Just because you're 36 weeks doesn't mean your baby is ready.
My Midwives' policy is to deliver at home between 36 and 42 weeks. Outside of that range they feel it's more prudent to have medical support, and I agree. But if I, personally, was to go into labor at 36 weeks, I would be very worried about lung prematurity in my baby, because my family has a history of being slower "cookers" (I'm a crock pot!).