Mothering › Forums › Breastfeeding › Lactivism › New article on Baby/home from foster care
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

New article on Baby/home from foster care  

post #1 of 49
Thread Starter 
http://www.nebraskainjurylawreport.com/


Baby is now home from foster care

October 17, 2007
Baby Joel Anaya was welcomed home Tuesday into his mother's arms. And his
father's arms. And his sister's. And his brother's. And another sister's.
And another brother's.

In fact, all nine of Joel's siblings held, kissed or otherwise fawned over
the 6-week-old brother they hadn't seen since he was whisked into foster
care last week.

"Finally, he's home," said older brother John Anaya. "He should have never
left."

The family of 12 piled onto a small couch for a photograph of the happy
moment, with the baby in the center. Not having Joel "has been very
stressful for the family," said Josue Anaya, their father.

Despite the objections of Josue Anaya and his wife, Mary, Joel's blood was
drawn Friday and screened for medical conditions, as required by state law.
The tests screen for a variety of conditions, including cystic fibrosis and
sickle cell disease, which could lead to mental retardation or death.

Joel had been in state custody since Oct. 10 when a petition was filed in
Douglas County Juvenile Court, alleging the Anayas put their son at risk by
not having him screened.
post #2 of 49
It's so great that child is back where he belongs.
post #3 of 49
Quote:
Nebraska’s program screens for nine very rare genetic diseases. The presumptive positive rate for the newborn screens in 2006 was less than 1/4 of 1 percent. The percentage of confirmed positive cases was even lower.
:
post #4 of 49
Maybe a bit OT but I don't understand why there can't be a religious exemption, like there is for vaxes. Since when does a baby automaticlly become property of the state? Urgh, so frustrating. It's just another way to try to control EVERY aspect of our lives.
post #5 of 49
it took them six weeks to give him back? Jesus, they could have just screened him and given him back (not that I think that was a good thing ) but six weeks
post #6 of 49
oh now I read the article and I still think it was awful I would just be distraught if my baby was prevented from nursing
post #7 of 49
No, it wasn't 6 weeks. They didn't take him at birth.
post #8 of 49
Thanks for posting our horror story. We really want people to write and complain so that the law can be changed. You can read below for more info.

I hope none of you are under the illusion that the press reported things correctly. They keep hounding us to say more about our religious beliefs whereas we wanted to keep this an issue of conscience. We do not have any bizarre doctrine about blood. We are merely confident our child does not have any rare disease and do not believe the state should take the blood of an infant-causing a definite trauma-just in unlikely situation that he may have a genetic disease.

Facts:
Oldest 2 children- not born in Nebraska. Oldest now 20-he went to college at 14, graduated at 17 with 2 degrees-youngest graduate ever of that University. 2nd oldest 17, sophomore at same university on the dean’s list.

Next 5 children-homebirthed in Nebraska. Received certified letters telling us to take children in for screening.

Checked into the law and found no enforcement provision.
Informed by others who had refused that we would be ignored or fined for non-compliance. We were ignored all five times.

Our 8th child, 6th born in Nebraska was Rosa. When she was 2 months old we received a subpoena to District Court. That had been added to the enforcement provision of the statute. We found a lawyer and fought it. That lawyer wanted us to fight it based on the First Amendment free exercise of religion. The case was only heard by the local district court judge who understood nothing about the case and the Nebraska Supreme Court. The Nebraska Supreme Court stole the case from the appeals court and the US Supreme Court did not hear the case.

Our 9th child, Justus, was born 2 years ago in Iowa to avoid the situation.

For 2 legislative sessions, State Senator Synowiecki has proposed exemption legislation. The 2nd time we had high hopes. We had more people testifying in favor of the bill than against, signed testimonies of the trauma the screening had caused other parents, and a petition signed by over 100 people. There were only a couple of testimonies from the state against the bill. However, it was killed in the health and human services committee and never made it to the floor for a vote.

Here are e-mails for the committee:

perdman@leg.ne.gov;
jjohnson@leg.ne.gov;
astuthman@leg.ne.gov;
tgay@leg.ne.gov;
dpankonin@leg.ne.gov
ghoward@leg.ne.gov;
thansen@leg.ne.gov;

Due to various reasons, Joel ended up being born in Nebraska. Believe me, if I had any idea this would have happened, I would have made more of an effort to have him in Iowa.

Joel was born on September 2. We immediately found a lawyer. On September 19th we received a certified letter telling us about the screening law and giving us until September 21st to test. Then, we received a phone call from Newborn Screening asking if we would test. We replied “no”. She asked if I knew what would happen next. I replied “yes” understanding that we would be subpoenaed into district court as stated in the statute.

Weeks went by without hearing anything. Then, on the morning of October 11th just after I had gotten Joel up from his morning nap, my doorbell rang. When I answered the door, an armed sheriff’s deputy came barging into my house yelling that he had a court order for Joel Anaya. I was screaming that I had not given him permission to enter my home. He said that he had a court order. I said that I wanted to call my lawyer. He said, “There’s no time.” There were 2 other deputies with guns and clubs guarding my doorways. He heard my children downstairs and ran downstairs where all my young children were. He snatched Joel out of my son’s arms and headed for the door. Joel was fussing and I knew he hadn’t eaten in 3 hours. I begged to be allowed to nurse him. The deputy told me, “There is no time. He will be cared for by professionals.” He ran out the door with my baby leaving me begging to nurse my baby and yelling for my son to call the lawyer. It was a cold day and the CPS people were not there yet to hand the baby over to, so the weather forced him back inside. I was crying and pleading to nurse.

My husband came home from the store just then. The sheriff deputies blocked him from entering our home.

I do want to mention that the social workers invited me along, were quite compassionate, and allowed me to nurse on demand the first day and a half until the juvenile court judge got all bent out of shape about my frequent nursing.

Hall of Justice
1701 Farnam Street, 6th Floor
Attn: Honorable Elizabeth G. Crnkovich
Omaha, NE 68183
(402) 444-7121

My entire family has been needlessly traumatized. I can not begin to tell you about all
the ripple effects. For the sake of future generations, please help us to fight this
horrible injustice.

There are other awful things such as the terrifying court order that I don't have time to
address now. Our case is dismissed, but we are appealing.


After 5 and a half awful days, we have Joel back. Praise God.

However, we have been denied due process. The affidavit to obtain custody falsely claimed Joel was in “immediate danger” and that “every reasonable effort to prevent removal” had been made. No one had ever hinted to us that the state could take custody if we refused the test.

I am afraid we have been the frog in the pan. The heat is applied gradually until we find ourselves boiling. Our rights are in serious trouble. Please pray and contact people in this post.
post #9 of 49


You are living my worst nightmare.
post #10 of 49
Thread Starter 
How is your baby doing now that he is home? You must be snuggling him like crazy!
post #11 of 49
Yes, we are hugging all of our children tighter. Our older children have been such a comfort too.

The foster mom told me Joel never once had a BM in foster care. Within 3 hours of coming home he had 2 big blowouts.

My system is all messed up. I usually don't start cycling until 10 months postpartum or later because I nurse on demand. The interruption in nursing has caused me to start cycling at 7 weeks.

I can not begin to tell you how much grief this has caused my whole family and our non-profit organization.
post #12 of 49
Quote:
Originally Posted by MMomofMany View Post
Yes, we are hugging all of our children tighter. Our older children have been such a comfort too.

The foster mom told me Joel never once had a BM in foster care. Within 3 hours of coming home he had 2 big blowouts.

My system is all messed up. I usually don't start cycling until 10 months postpartum or later because I nurse on demand. The interruption in nursing has caused me to start cycling at 7 weeks.

I can not begin to tell you how much grief this has caused my whole family and our non-profit organization.
post #13 of 49
Mama,

I just don't have words. My heart is broken for what they have done to you and your whole family. You are all in my prayers.

I'm not in Nebraska but I will write letters and pass your story along so others can do the same.

::
post #14 of 49
Although I dont believe in skipping the screenings (I am NOT crunchy - I vax on time and totally - I newborn test - I DO however breastfeed) I do believe that as a parent you have a right to refuse those test. You have had many children and know the possibilities with Joel. I DO believe your rights were trampled, and that you did NOT receive due process. What the system has done to you and your family is an outrage and scares me to death to think that just because the system has a different belief than I do that they can come at any given moment with out any notice and take my children. I believe totally that the system has an ego that they believe they are god. Which they ARE NOT. If I can get a good letter together I will certainly email it out to all of the emails you left. I am sorry your family has went through this. I am wonderfully happy that Joel is back in your arms - a place he should have never had to leave. And he should have never been seperated from you. Although I am against all these frivolous lawsuits around and about today - I througly believe that you have merit to sue the HE77 Out of the state and everyone involved. And I would. Please keep us updated on your case.
post #15 of 49
Quote:
Originally Posted by MMomofMany View Post
The foster mom told me Joel never once had a BM in foster care. Within 3 hours of coming home he had 2 big blowouts.
Grr. How can the legal system have possibly thought separation was "best" for baby Joel? The total disregard for the value of the breastfeeding relationship makes me maddest of all. Clearly Nebraska needs better breastfeeding protection laws. *sigh* I'm glad Joel's back home now.
post #16 of 49
I guess I'm confused.

When the media made it sound like you had a deeply held religious belief I was pretty strongly on your side (although I don't happen to hold the same religious belief).

However, now that you say you don't I'm simply confused.

So basically, although you don't believe this testing is immoral you allowed your son to be traumatized in this manner? You allowed an infant to suffer this to make a point?

Is it that you believe that a heel stick would be more traumatic than a 5 day separation and a disruption of the nursing relationship?

I have to say I'm really confused by this.

I am also unclear what makes you "confident" that your child doesn't have these conditions?

Please help me understand.
post #17 of 49
Quote:
Originally Posted by Momily View Post
I guess I'm confused.

When the media made it sound like you had a deeply held religious belief I was pretty strongly on your side (although I don't happen to hold the same religious belief).

However, now that you say you don't I'm simply confused.

So basically, although you don't believe this testing is immoral you allowed your son to be traumatized in this manner? You allowed an infant to suffer this to make a point?

Is it that you believe that a heel stick would be more traumatic than a 5 day separation and a disruption of the nursing relationship?

I have to say I'm really confused by this.

I am also unclear what makes you "confident" that your child doesn't have these conditions?

Please help me understand.
Since when has the media these days done anything but infotainment; playing up the most sensational aspect of a story even if it's not truly relevant in the way they decide to make it out? I thought MMomofMany was pretty clear. Religious beliefs against needless trauma of a newborn. And since they have 8 other children, it would be pretty obvious by this point if those rare diseases were an issue for their family. Also, it was made clear that they were blind sided by the separation order and the conduct of the authorities. They were under the impression that they would be subpoenaed to court, but nothing this drastic or traumatic.

I don't believe in needlessly traumatizing newborns either, nor consenting to medical treatments that are not necessary. While there is no published doctrine specifically proscribing this for my faith, though I'd like to see anyone find any published doctrine for my faith, it is something that I hold as in line with my religious beliefs. While such religious things aren't in the forefront of my mind as a big deal, I could see the media taking it and running with it should I ever find myself in MMomofMany's situation. Any non-mainstream parenting issue can be turned against the parents. By being here, Momily,you probably practice some aspect of parenting outside the mainstream, and also are vulnerable to such attack.

Anna
post #18 of 49
I do have strongly held religious beliefs. Just not what has been reported on some sites. People have said that we think a blood draw will cause us or our baby to go to hell. I never said that. The Bible does say that "the life of the flesh is in the blood". The Red Cross even says blood is life. The Bible says to abstain from blood and has a prohibition against cutting yourself. Jesus said, "it is not the well that need a physician, but the sick." I know my children are not sick. There are a lot more reasons I could list for not wanting to do the test.

I have 10 children, 3 born in other states, 6 born in Nebraska and then Joel in this case. Re-read my first post. We managed to avoid testing with all of the 6 born in Nebraska. Rosa was our first one to end up in court and since the appeal took 2 years, she never did get tested. I had absolutely no reason or prior experience to lead me to believe that the state would or could take custody of Joel. The thought never crossed my mind before the sheriff deputies entered my home. If I had known that was possible, I would have driven across the border to Iowa during labor to have him there like I did with the previous baby.

Family needs me. Have to go.
post #19 of 49
I'm so sorry this has happened to you. There is absolutely no reason for it. I'm appalled that the system would do this. I've been following the story and posting contact info. i really hope we are able to get things changed so no mother ever has to go through this again.
Blessings,
Michelle
post #20 of 49
I'm SO sorry this happened to you.

Does / Is anyone willing to type up a good form type letter? I'd like to e-mail BUT, I'm not eloquent at all and fear that I may end up saying the opposite of what I intend.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Lactivism
This thread is locked  
Mothering › Forums › Breastfeeding › Lactivism › New article on Baby/home from foster care