Mothering › Mothering Discussion Forums › Parenting › Family Safety › When do they switch to a forward facing carseat?
New Posts  All Forums:
 

When do they switch to a forward facing carseat? - Page 8

post #141 of 160
Quote:
Originally Posted by an_aurora View Post
The Swedish seats have a 55 lb RF limit, so you'll be good for awhile
Oh, I wasn't worried about the weight limit. I was thinking more of height and harness slots. I heard 17" (per this thread) vs. 20" for the Regent. That's a significant difference. But, then, in another thread AdventureDad said his 4-year-old at 110 cm/43.3" had just outgrown his RF seat and gone into a booster. If my guy stayed in the same percentile for height, he'd be about the same at 4 years. So, 4 years old sounds good to me. But is that really true, with 17" highest harness slot? AdventureDad, do you maybe have some measurements around for the harness slots to confirm that?

Quote:
Originally Posted by an_aurora View Post
Also, the seats do tether RF but do not require designated RF tether points. What car do you have? Is it a Taurus? Try flipping the front seat forward and sliding it out of the way. You should be able to find something on the seat track to tether to.
It's an Escort, which is smaller than a Taurus. I'll try flipping the seat forward, though, and have another look -- thanks.
post #142 of 160
Well the harness slots don't matter since they will be below the shoulder for RF anyway. You do have to consider the shell height, but I believe they are tall enough to see most kids to ~4 RFing. I'm sure AD can shed some more light on the subject.
post #143 of 160
Quote:
Originally Posted by an_aurora View Post
Well the harness slots don't matter since they will be below the shoulder for RF anyway. You do have to consider the shell height, but I believe they are tall enough to see most kids to ~4 RFing.
That's true -- I forgot it would be different harness rules. I'm trying to keep too many numbers straight! I've heard 24" height total.

I think I've found a lower tether anchor option. Thanks for the tip.

Now, at 4 years old, say, when DS outgrows the Swedish seat, he wouldn't be ready for a booster, would he?

Just to play devil's advocate, if I got, eg, a Regent he could theoretically use it up to ~53"/135 cm, which might be 8 years old if I'm forecasting based on percentiles correctly. I realize that ideally I'd buy both seats and switch him from the Swedish seat to the Regent at 4. But if I could buy only one, is it better to go with a Regent or similar and keep him harnessed longer, or is it better to have him RF till 4 and then switch to a booster?

Sigh...speculating on your child's safety kinda stinks.

One other idea, and this is what I can tell DH to justify the tremendous expense (ha ha), is that our next kid could use the RF seat when DS outgrows it and then we can buy the Regent or similar for him, then use it for the second kid if everything's not expired by then. We were thinking about 4 years apart (if we have another), so it might work. No, wait, they only last 6 years, don't they? Shoot. So the next kid would get the RF one for only 3 years and then the Regent for 3. Well, whatever.

All right, more thinking to do.

Anyone know about air travel with a Swedish seat?? Our families live across the country. If I'm buying a RF Swedish seat + a travel seat + a Regent/similar + a booster ... see, that's a lot of money for me. And that's assuming I don't get found out by the NHTSA and fined for using an illegal seat!
post #144 of 160
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alki Mama View Post
One other idea, and this is what I can tell DH to justify the tremendous expense (ha ha), is that our next kid could use the RF seat when DS outgrows it and then we can buy the Regent or similar for him, then use it for the second kid if everything's not expired by then.
All right, I crunched some numbers. Someone check my math & reasoning.

Here are the scenarios, based on the highly theoretical idea of having a second child when #1 is 4 years old. That's our "plan," but we know from our work in getting the first one that plans don't always work. That said, I had to pick some sort of numbers to work with, so I went with 4 years apart.

Further, I had to guess on sizes and ages for how long each seat would last each child, and obviously I might not have guessed correctly, and I don't know all the averages (as in, what age a seat is outgrown typically) for the seats involved. I was doing this while we were driving somewhere, in the dark, just to try to get something on paper. (And, it fell under the car in the rain while I was getting DS out of his seat -- but I rescued it!)

Thirdly, I have no idea how big the theoretical second child will be. I'm supposing not a giant like DS, because that was presumably an anomaly, but I would assume above average height and weight because DH & I are (say, 90-95th percentile for both).

Finally, I'm approximating costs, just to have numbers to use. I'm guessing $600 for the Swedish seat with shipping (might be more or less) and $100 for a booster, because I have no idea how much boosters cost. The booster cost doesn't matter for my purposes, though.

OK, caveats taken care of, here are the two scenarios:

Getting a Swedish seat

DS#1:
Swedish seat from 1 year old - 4 yrs -- $600
Regent or similar high-limit FF seat from 4 yrs - 7 yrs -- $300
Booster from 7 yrs+ -- $100

DC#2:
Same Swedish seat from 0 - 3 yrs (till it expires at 6 years)
Same Regent or similar from 3 - 6 yrs (till it expires)
Same or second booster from 6 yrs+ -- $100 possibly

TOTAL = $1,000 (1 booster) or $1,100 (2 boosters)

(Again, what the boosters actually cost is irrelevant, since I'll use the same figure in both scenarios.)


NOT getting a Swedish seat

DS#1:
Current seat FF till ~2 years old (till ht or wt limit reached)
Regent or similar from 2 yrs - 8 yrs -- $300
Possible booster from 8 yrs+ -- $100

DC#2:
RF in convertible with 35-lb RF limit & higher FF limit from 0 - 2 yrs (or whenever 35 lbs/ht limit is met) -- $300
FF in same seat from 2 yrs - 6 yrs (or whenever limit met or seat expires)
If too young for booster, Regent or similar till 8 yrs old -- possible $300
If old enough, booster from 6 yrs+ -- $100

TOTAL = $700 (1 booster for DC#2 only & no extra Regent) or $800 (no extra Regent & two boosters) or $1,000 (two Regents & one booster) or $1,100 (two Regents & two boosters)


Things I've determined from this exercise: It's not much more expensive to buy a Swedish seat, and possibly the same price. A lot depends on the timing and size of the kids involved. If we didn't have a second kid, obviously there's no seat sharing. If we have the second kid earlier or later, it really messes up the figures. And if we have another giant later than 4 years apart, we might need a second Swedish seat!

Another point is that the Swedish seat model puts the cost upfront, and the other way spreads it out over more years. We're poor now, but I've no idea if we might be just as poor in the future, particularly if we have a second kid.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Alki Mama View Post
Anyone know about air travel with a Swedish seat??
I'm going to assume US air travel with a Swedish seat is out, but if anyone knows differently, let me know. That said, depending on what seat we bought that wasn't a Swedish one (Regent, e.g.), we might have to buy a separate travel seat anyway. I guess that's a research for another day.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Alki Mama View Post
And that's assuming I don't get found out by the NHTSA and fined for using an illegal seat!
Does anyone have a thought as to the morality of using an illegal seat? Does no one have a problem with it?

And what do you think my risks are for being caught? I was thinking I could drape a light blanket over the bar part that makes the seat look the most different from a US seat. But do you think we'd get stopped at some point just for having a giant kid facing backwards? Even if just as a safety check to tell us no seats in the US allow a child to sit that way at that age?
post #145 of 160
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alki Mama View Post
Does anyone have a thought as to the morality of using an illegal seat? Does no one have a problem with it?

And what do you think my risks are for being caught? I was thinking I could drape a light blanket over the bar part that makes the seat look the most different from a US seat. But do you think we'd get stopped at some point just for having a giant kid facing backwards? Even if just as a safety check to tell us no seats in the US allow a child to sit that way at that age?
I wouldn't have a problem with using an "illegal" seat. You can always have a doctor and a CPST write letters explaining WHY you have the seat, and carry those. Honestly, though, the chances of you being pulled over and ticketed for using the seats are very very slim.
post #146 of 160
Quote:
Originally Posted by an_aurora View Post
You can always have a doctor and a CPST write letters explaining WHY you have the seat, and carry those.
The doctor I've got, but I'd be afraid to ask a local CPST in case s/he disagreed with my decision and reported me. Would someone online here be willing to give me a letter like that to print out?
post #147 of 160
DS1 was RF in the Britax Wizard until he was a little over 3 and he hit the RF limit (34#IIRC). We turned him FF. A couple months later his brother hit the limit for the baby bucket so we got DS1 the Regent and put DS2 RF in the Wizard.

DS1 (5) has tons of space left in the Regent when many of his friends and cousins are in booster seats. DS2 (2 & 28#) is still RF in the Wizard.

Not only are we keeping our kids RF as long as possible, we will keep them in a 5-pt harness as long as possible. Don't forget to keep track of the weight limits on your car's LATCH components.
post #148 of 160
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alki Mama View Post
And what do you think my risks are for being caught? I was thinking I could drape a light blanket over the bar part that makes the seat look the most different from a US seat. But do you think we'd get stopped at some point just for having a giant kid facing backwards? Even if just as a safety check to tell us no seats in the US allow a child to sit that way at that age?
I think the risk of being caught isn't so much the concern, as that an insurance company might not pay for medical care in the event of a crash w/ it because it's illegal.... if it were on rx from your dr I'd think they'd have to (I'm certainly no expert, just speculating) ; hard to weigh pros vs cons in this situation, certainly better to have the kid as safe as possible - which is rf for all passengers - but at the same time, if there is an accident and the insurance decides not to cover (which we all know they're great at finding ways NOT to pay around here) you possibly have an injured kid w/ no medical care.......
post #149 of 160
Hi, I've removed a number of posts that were in violation of the User Agreement by promoting a service, business or website or referenced or quoted posts that did. Please do not post in this manner again. Please PM me or AdinaL with any questions. Thanks!
Quote:

Do not post to advertise your product or business. Acceptable advertising is available on the boards. Information may be obtained by contacting advertising@mothering.com for banner ads. Advertising in signatures and in discussion board threads is strictly prohibited with the exception of those members who have paid the fee for the Signature Advertising Package. MDC sales and fundraising information may be posted by administrators, moderators, and designated members. Members may not use their business or product names as a username.
post #150 of 160
I'm pretty sure insurance not paying would not be an issue. If car insurance didn't cover the results of negligent or illegal behavior, it would be pretty worthless.
post #151 of 160
Quote:
Originally Posted by ccohenou View Post
I'm pretty sure insurance not paying would not be an issue. If car insurance didn't cover the results of negligent or illegal behavior, it would be pretty worthless.
I think the issue might lie in if YOU were to hit someone. Honestly though, we've been in 2 crashes now w/ seats in our car (neither our fault) and not once has anyone asked to see our seats. I know some places ask to have your seat when you get your check for new ones etc. Last time, the guy just looked up our seats online, so the problem would be you'd have to buy a US replacement seat for it that would be comparable, which would be considerably less than what you paid for a Swedish seat.
post #152 of 160
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alki Mama View Post
Is the Regent a good choice? I'm a little worried about its enormity for air travel, but we're trying to avoid flying, anyway.
Just a point of order: the Regent is not approved for air travel. It doesn't fit in an airplane seat, so it lacks the FAA sticker. You would definitely need another seat for air travel if you chose the Regent.
post #153 of 160
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ironica View Post
Just a point of order: the Regent is not approved for air travel. It doesn't fit in an airplane seat, so it lacks the FAA sticker. You would definitely need another seat for air travel if you chose the Regent.
Oh, yeah, now I remember that was one of the things I didn't like about it. So many features to consider! Is the SafeGuard seat FAA approved? -- Never mind, I just found out that it is. (Not the folding one, but the regular seat.) But it's expensive, too. Hmmm...

Well, I'm leaning toward never flying again anyway...sorry, family on the East Coast!
post #154 of 160
Yep, as you found, the safeguard is FAA approved.

Don't remember if I put it in this thread- a couple of places have them on sale for $259.99

-Angela
post #155 of 160
Bumping this thread and asking for help...

I'm trying to make the best possible decison for my daughter, who will be 2 1/2 next month. She's currently rearfacing in her convertible which goes to 33 lbs and 36 inches. DD is 35 inches tall but only weighs 23/24 lbs. We have two seats (the same), and two cars. The Tahoe is not a problem, but in my car, a Ford Focus, DD complains of being "too big" for her seat, "uncomfortable", and her legs and arms hurt...

I don't know what to do! I'm afraid if I turn her around in my car, she'll want to be ffing in the Tahoe, too. FWIW, I can see when she's sitting in her seat in my Focus that she truly does look uncomfortable. Somehow we never got much recline on that seat at all, (car too small), and her little chest appears to be pitched over her knees with her head cranked forward. Ugh. The seat already has one noodle under it (the fat kind installed by a tech). Is it possible to SAFELY prop the seat up so she has more room for her head, neck, and chest, not to mention legs??

Is my only option to buy a bigger seat (and figure out what would fit in my car) only to have to flip that one when DD hits the height limit?
post #156 of 160
Hmm... what seat? I would find a way to keep her rf at this point- she's so small still.

-Angela
post #157 of 160
Quote:
Originally Posted by alegna View Post
Don't remember if I put it in this thread- a couple of places have them on sale for $259.99
I saw that in your review of it somewhere -- sounds like a great seat & a great deal! Thanks.
post #158 of 160
Quote:
Originally Posted by alegna View Post
Hmm... what seat? I would find a way to keep her rf at this point- she's so small still.

-Angela
Eddie Bauer convertible. And the weight limit rearfacing is 35 lbs, not 33 (I remembered wrong).
post #159 of 160
I've kept all my kids rear facing till the height limit is reached on their seats. For Janelle this was at 3 1/2, for Kincaid this was at 18 months... I can't keep them rearfacing till the weight limit, cause at 6 years old and 45" Janelle is just now 35lbs. Travis is shorter than she (and slightly lighter) was, and he is in a boulevard where as she had a roundabout, she he may be rearfacing till 5 or so.
post #160 of 160
A baby outgrowing a Boulevard at 18 months is extremely rare.
New Posts  All Forums:
 
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Family Safety
Mothering › Mothering Discussion Forums › Parenting › Family Safety › When do they switch to a forward facing carseat?