wow.
post #41 of 57
11/12/07 at 8:26pm
|
No, I do see your point I just don't agree. I'm sorry you don't see that my NICU experience wasn't just based on being in a hospital. It was based on length of stay, prognosis, treatments, proceedures and surgery.
Things can be equally valid without being equal in difficulty. |
|
Maybe I'm missing your point. How can my experience of being told that my baby will most likely die during delivery and then, that she will probably die in her first few days or if she doesn't suffer major complications be the same as someone who's baby was taken directly to special care to be monitored while they to grow be the same thing?
|
|
It's not about the procedure, take procedure, stay length and gestation out of it and you still come up with the same fundimental raw emotions. The why me, the doubt and sense of failure, the stress and emotional turmoil. The not knowing, the sense of powerlessness when something goes wrong or takes a step back after taking two forward.
^^ Did you not go through those things too? Perhaps at a different intensity of emotions and thoughts than I did, or perhaps not but still went through it didn't you? As I did. That's my point. peroid. |
|
No they aren't the same but that shouldn't diminish the feelings of someone that has a feeder/grower. Many moms that deliver at 32-34 weeks have had weeks or months of complications with their pregnancies. Not to mention an extremely traumatic birth experience. I don't think I've read a preemie birth story that wasn't awful. So while it may seem like we got off easy compared to what a micro goes through it doesn't necessarily make it easy to deal with.
|
|
Well, this got really crazy here, but going back to the original post, I do remember a book I read about ranges of prematurity. It was by Dr. Sears (and again, not recommended for micro moms - thanks Amys1st) but 36+ was considered FT, 30 to 35-6/7 weeks was considered premature, 27 through 29-6/7 weeks was considered extreme prematurity, and anything below 27 weeks was considered a micro. Maybe we should just stop using prematurity as a blanket term.
|
|
Your experience and my experience are not the same, I guess you can take that anyway you want. That of course, as I've said before, doesn't make your experience any more or less valid than mine.
But see, my point is that you *can't* take those things out of my experience. They are part of what I went through, they will always be part of what I went through. This isn't a mathematical equation where you can just take away certain things and pretend they didn't happen. The level of emotion that I felt is not the same as what you would have experienced. Just as how another womans experience is worse than mine because she lost her child. To say that her and my experiences are the same because our babies were both in hospital is belittling and demeaning in the same way your saying that a baby who went to the hospital nursery because it needed monitoring for a day or so is the same as my five month stay is. By no stretch of the imagination are those things the same. What you seem to be missing is that, just because I've said my experience is worse does not detract from how bad yours was. Your experience will always be as bad as it was but that doesn't make it equally as bad as another persons. You're absolutely right Susien and if you read over my posts you'll see that I've said time and time again that it is absolutely horrible and the worst experience of a new mums life to have their baby - no matter what gestation - taken away at or shortly after birth. |
|
I think that's part of the problem too. The word premature can be perceived by people in many different ways. What some consider micro prems others may consider just extreme prematurity. What about 28 weeker twins. My SIL's twins were 28 weeks but according the docs at the time, because there are two of them they step back two weeks as well to account for two babies making the twins 26 weekers. Under the reference you quoted the twins were physically extreme premature but under the perceptions of the doctor and the standards at the time (and their size really, both were under 2 lbs at birth) they were considered micro prems.
My only point was that regardless of WHY the baby is there every NICU mama (and papa) goes through the same set of initial emotions and subsequent emotions at one point and time. The sets of emotions and feelings for NICU parents whether it's a 2 hr stay in NICU, a 2 week stay or 2 month stay intersects each other on an emotional scale. The experiences may not be the same in length, health and size or prematurity (or lack of) but the emotions are fundamentally on the same level as each other. My last post wasn't a pissing match at who's baby was more sick or who stayed longer and had more problems. It was to convey that despite our different experiences and what happened with our babies we went through the same range of emotions albeit perhaps at different levels of emotion at different times within our experiences. |
| What you seem to be missing is that, just because I've said my experience is worse does not detract from how bad yours was. Your experience will always be as bad as it was but that doesn't make it equally as bad as another persons. |
| I envy you Le Bec. You and your lo went through so much and from what I can see in your posts in this thread you are very passionate about your experiences and your little girl. |
|
As much as I totally agree with you I think this will be the straw that makes the mods lock the thread. I don't understand why someone would continue to try to revel in the drama of having the sickest baby and making other mothers feel they have it easy, but clearly there are those who won't let go.
|
| I agree, everyone must experience the same "base" emotions |



Follow Mothering