post #141 of 141
Quote:
Originally Posted by thismama View Post
Nobody is suggesting that the OP's children (either of them!) should prefer a circed penis to an intact one. But I do find the post heterosexist, and just a bit overly focused on the foreskin and its connection to sexuality.
Um, a foreskin is DIRECTLY connected to any sexuality involving a male, be it gay, straight, solo, or whatever, or at least it ought to be. The post isn't heterosexist, its just rational. Considering the odds, its safe to assume that the OP's child will be straight.

Quote:
There is a lot to sexuality and there is no way to know whether either child will have or want a partner with a foreskin, and what that might or might not mean to their sex lives.
To see how sick that sounds, let me modify it slightly: "There is a lot to sexuality and there is no way to know whether either child will have or want a partner with a clitoris, and what that might or might not mean to their sex lives."

Cutting a nonconsenting person is wrong, regardless of gender.