Quote:
Originally posted by Nursing Mother Mamagrrl, Wow, am I being analized or what! |
I'd have to choose 'What'. I had no intention of analyzing you personally, but rather taking a look at what you said was going on and why you said you were doing this or that. I guess I took your post more philosophically than you intended. If being thoughtfully philosophical is *analyzing*, then I suppose I wouldn't be able to choose 'What' anymore...
Quote:
| Napster (it is with a p)is a website that lets you download songs, with the purpose of kids listening and hoping then they'll run off to the local Blockbuster music store and buy the whole CD. There are actually several sites like that. |
Actually, there is both a Napster, and a Nabster. Both started as music piracy sites although the courts closed down Napster for a time, after which it reopened with a greatly limited legal content. Nabster was recently closed down for similar reasons. You said your kids were on *Nabster* (see previous post.) No biggie. Same difference, only one is less well known.
Quote:
| And as for my other kids and what they do, how would you even know what I teach them or what responsiblities I give them in watching out for each other. |
Again, from your previous post/s where you said your Older Kids were downloading from Nabster, that your Younger Kid was on the computer and the popup appeared because Nabster was still running. I assumed from what you said, that the Older Kid wasn't keeping watch while downloading from a non-little-kid site. I assumed that if the Older was keeping an eye on his/her download and an inappropriate popup appeared, they would have closed the pop-up immediately - unfortunately, your 4 year old called it to your attention. I understood that the sending of a popup from a site left open by your Older Kid was used as a good reason for having net-nanny software. I apologize if I misunderstood what you were saying.
Quote:
| Control issues? What are you talking about? |
You said that the issue wasn't trust, but was "popups [appearing] without permission." Requiring permission generally means there is a desire to control something absolutely, wouldn't you agree? Do we ever make anyone ask permission when we do not want control? In this case, access to certain parts of the web. I was making the case that in many philosophies, if there is an understanding and open agreement within the household on why something is uncomfortable and what we should do when we run across that situation, then it is most likely that the children of the household will fully incorporate that information into their beings - and act appropriately even when they are not being externally controlled. It is sometimes that the hidden and the forbidden is the most sought-after territory - and not only by children.
Quote:
| Are you implying someone in my house is going to porn sites? |
(grin, shaking head) Not at all. Please re-read my post. But then, if someone IS going to a porn site, it would be a terrific opportunity to have a quiet chat with that member of the family and discuss the objectification of women, the economics of porn, what exactly goes into a porn shoot and just how UN-sexy it all is... and just what the parents ideas of sex, fidelity and etc are... not that you and the rest of us haven't all had this discussion with our kids already, but it would make a terrific opportunity to do so if we hadn't.
Quote:
| This just all took me by suprize mamagrrl, I'm exactly sure what you are trying to tell me? |
I'm saying that there are philosophies of parenting that are different from the one presented by you, and here is some philosophy which would lead to different decisions on net-access and net-nannying.
I suppose Vickie and Barbara said it best when they said,
Quote:
| Developing an honest relationship with our kids will do far more to teach self-control than any blocks or restrictions we can place on them. [and] ...make sure that you talk, talk, talk, to your kids about what they are doing... |
Follow Mothering