Mothering › Forums › Breastfeeding › Lactivism › News update on driving while breastfeeding
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

News update on driving while breastfeeding  

post #1 of 5
Thread Starter 
Posted on Thu, Aug. 07, 2003

Strict faith is no defense
Breast-feeding driver loses bid to have husband be her substitute in trial
By Ed Meyer Beacon Journal staff writer

RAVENNA - At best, the misdemeanor trial of 29-year-old Catherine Nicole Donkers is likely to go down in history as a little out of the ordinary.

It began in a packed courtroom Wednesday morning when Portage County Municipal Judge Donald H. Martell ruled that the woman's husband, Brad L. Barnhill, 46, cannot act as her lawyer or substitute for her as the defendant in the case.

Donkers, who was arrested May 8 after she admitted breast-feeding her infant daughter while driving on the Ohio Turnpike, had cited the couple's religious beliefs in trying to convince the judge that only her husband could answer for her public acts.

But Martell put a quick end to that, telling Donkers: ``You're representing your interests, and if you're found guilty of any charges... it will be you that will be subject to the punishment of the court, not your husband.''

And with that, the daylong proceedings began in a case that has drawn attention from radio and television talk shows and newspapers throughout the United States and Canada.

Donkers, with Barnhill whispering instructions to her from the first row of the gallery as Martell entered the courtroom, was charged with misdemeanor counts of child endangering, driving without a license, failure to comply with the order of a police officer and other driving infractions.

She will stand trial before the judge alone, defending herself, and it could drag on for the rest of the week, Martell said.

After Donkers refused to accept a court-appointed public defender as her defense counsel, trying to introduce an edition of the Jerusalem Bible as her first piece of evidence, Assistant Portage County Prosecutor Sean P. Scahill opened the state's case by announcing his list of witnesses.

Donkers countered by announcing her own witnesses, one of which, she argued, should be the state of Ohio.

``I'm not sure we have room in the hallway,'' the judge replied, citing the need to keep witnesses outside the courtroom until they are called to testify.

The judge asked Barnhill to leave the courtroom, reminding him that he was also on his wife's potential witness list.

It was that kind of day, a day in which the prosecutor made it through only two witnesses.

The judge allowed public defender John P. Laczko to stay at the defense table, although Donkers refused his help. Laczko said little, though, and mostly shook his head at what he heard.

Trucker testifies

Truck driver George W. Barrett of Syracuse, N.Y., who called 911 to report the incident, testified that he just happened to look out the window of his truck when he saw Donkers driving with a child in her lap.

``I could not believe what I saw,'' Barrett said.

As Barrett began to follow Donkers, he said he made contact with another truck driver on his citizens band radio -- and ``he couldn't believe it either.''

According to testimony, State Highway Patrol trooper Adam M. Doles then followed Donkers' maroon Chrysler Sebring convertible for three miles before she finally pulled into a toll area.

Before that, Doles said, he had clocked Donkers at 68 mph on his radar unit, 3 mph over the interstate limit.

Audio and videotapes from the trooper's patrol car, played in their entirety and lasting nearly two hours, showed that the entire incident could have been over in minutes if Donkers had simply stopped.

Doles said he used his overhead lights, turned on his siren at least three times and even ordered Donkers to stop over his car loudspeaker, but she drove on before finally stopping in front of a toll booth.

Trooper on tape

When Doles approached the Sebring, according to the tapes, he told Donkers she would have been free to leave after simply accepting a ticket for violating the state's child-restraint law.

But Donkers refused to turn over her driver's license or even turn off the car, Doles said, so he had no choice but to call his supervisor to the scene.

More than an hour later, Donkers and her baby daughter were finally in the back of the trooper's car on the way to the patrol post in Hiram.

She was later held at the Portage County Jail, according to testimony, while her husband drove from Pittsburgh to pick up the baby.

Donkers, meanwhile, argues in court papers that she is a resident of Michigan, which has an exception to its child-restraint law if the baby is being nursed.

Barnhill has filed reams of court documents in the case, citing the family's membership in The First Christian Fellowship for Eternal Sovereignty, which opposes many federal laws and government agencies. He has threatened to take the case to the U.S. Supreme Court.

The second day of testimony is scheduled to begin at 9 this morning.

If convicted of the highest misdemeanor charge of child endangering, Donkers could face a maximum of six months in jail and a $1,000 fine.
post #2 of 5
: freaks.
post #3 of 5
Loony-tunes.

But hey, I think it's cool that a trucker called the cops on her. I know that there are good truckers out there, but they do have such a bad rep, and more than a couple have severely irritated me. Three cheers for the good samaritans!!!
post #4 of 5
Intriguing. In previous news reports, the parents claimed she was rushing home to handle a witness in a trial she was working on--that she's a lawyer.

And yet she tries to have her husband stand trial for her? Wouldn't a lawyer know better?

Do you think this is just some huge publicity stunt she and her husband cooked up to challenge the government publicly? They claim to belong to "The First Christian Fellowship for Eternal Sovereignty, which opposes many federal laws and government agencies", and I assume this is why she refused to give over her driver's license and wouldn't pull over for three miles when the trooper tried to get her to pull over.

But the whole incident could have just resulted in a ticket from the trooper and she could have gone on. By refusing to give him her license, she turned this ito a protracted incident--this when she was suposedly breastfeeding and driving to save time and rush home to work on a case.

This doesn't add up.
post #5 of 5
Thread Starter 

The verdict

COLOR=red]Actually, she doesn't HAVE a driver's licence. There was a quote somewhere by her husband that went something like: the government doesn't have the right to tell me if I can or cannot operate my property on the roadways... (?) Bizzarre [/COLOR] :
No virdict, yet.


Posted on Fri, Aug. 08, 2003

Woman who nursed while driving convicted
By Ed Meyer
Beacon Journal staff writer

RAVENNA - A judge found a woman who nursed her baby while driving on the Ohio Turnpike guilty of multiple traffic charges Friday morning but did not convict her of child endangering.

Catherine Donkers, 29, admitted holding her baby in her lap as she drove from Pennsylvania to Michigan on May 8, but had made numerous claims suggesting that Ohio's traffic laws shouldn't apply to her as she defended herself in Portage County Common Pleas Court.

Judge Donald H. Martell decided the case without a jury, found her guilty of violating the car-seat law, driving without a license, failure to comply with the order of a police officer and other driving infractions.

He said he couldn't convict her on the most serious charge, child endangering, because it referred to the same event as the car-seat violation -- that she didn't have then-7-month-old Seren restrained.

Martell didn't sentence Donkers today, though prosecutor Sean P. Scahill recommended a 30-day jail term and $500 fine.

The trial began Wednesday with Martell ruling that Donkers' husband, Brad L. Barnhill, 46, could not act as her lawyer or substitute for her as the defendant in the case. Donkers had cited the couple's religious beliefs in trying to convince the judge that only her husband could answer for her public acts.

Barnhill has filed reams of court documents in the case, citing the family's membership in The First Christian Fellowship for Eternal Sovereignty, which opposes many federal laws and government agencies. He has threatened to take the case to the U.S. Supreme Court.

In testimony Thursday, Barnhill said he was talking to his wife on her cell phone, directing her every move, before she pulled off the turnpike with the lights of a state trooper's cruiser flashing in her rearview mirror.

``So,'' Scahill said, ``she was nursing your child, she was talking on the cell phone and she was driving down the turnpike?''

Barnhill, 46, paused and said: ``That would be a fair characterization.''

Martell permitted Donkers to make a statement from the witness stand Thursday because, acting as her own lawyer, she could not call herself as a witness.

It took 10 minutes, alone, for Donkers to state that she would tell the truth. She refused to take the sworn oath that the bailiff tried to read to her, she said, because it would be ``repugnant to my faith to swear an oath.''

She eventually promised to tell the truth, without swearing.

Under cross-examination by the prosecutor, Donkers gave even more details of what she was doing when she was talking to her husband with the trooper trailing her.

Donkers said she was taking notes -- on a piece of paper on the steering wheel of her Chrysler Sebring convertible -- for an unrelated court case in which she and her husband are involved.

``I had a piece of paper on the steering wheel, and I was writing something down -- with my right hand,'' Donkers said.

When Scahill asked her where her child was as she was doing that, she replied that the baby was ``nursing on the nursing pillow'' in her lap.

``So,'' Scahill said, ``now you're going down the turnpike, writing on a piece of paper... with your infant in your lap?''

She said she was.

Donkers had said earlier in her statement that she didn't believe ``any substantial risk was posed to my child'' by anything she did before the trooper finally stopped her car.

The stop was at a toll plaza, according to testimony, three miles after Trooper Adam M. Doles left the median to pursue Donkers' car.

A New York truck driver testified on the trial's first day Wednesday that he called 911 to report the incident after seeing the baby in Donkers' lap.

Trip recounted

Donkers corroborated that testimony when she answered another of Scahill's questions about the events of May 8.

After crossing the line from Pennsylvania, Donkers said she stopped at the first Ohio rest area and fed the baby some formula with rice.

After that, she said, the baby was still hungry, so she put the child in her lap and ``drove along.''

She estimated she drove with the baby in her lap for about 40 minutes before the trooper got involved.

What would she have done if she needed to take evasive action?

``Probably hit the brake pedal,'' she told the prosecutor.

Donkers said she did not pull over immediately after seeing the trooper behind her because ``I wasn't going to place myself and my child in jeopardy by going off on the side of the road.''

To bolster that argument, Donkers entered into evidence a magazine from the Geico insurance company, noting a section called ``Ticket Etiquette,'' which advised drivers to slow down and pull over to a safe area if they feel their safety is at risk.

Her husband testified she had been assaulted twice before by police officers. Donkers, too, said she was afraid to pull over immediately for Doles because she had been ``twice sexually assaulted, once while I was unconscious.''

When she started to describe in detail what happened on those occasions, the judge stopped her in midsentence and said he did not need the ``minute details.''

``The court does not disbelieve that you've had difficulties with other individuals,'' Martell said.

As he convicted her today, the judge told Donkers he found her guilty of the eluding charge because, by definition, she didn't heed to the trooper's order to pull over.

Donkers says her home was Michigan at the time of the traffic stop, though Barnhill had been staying in Pittsburgh for work. The car she drove had license plates from Michigan, where the child-restraint law has a nursing-baby exception.

She testified she had no driver's license from any state and couldn't get one from Pennsylvania because she refuses to get a Social Security number.

Barnhill said the family has just moved to Hollywood, where he works for a California firm that helps people get out of debt.

``We got in the truck and moved to Beverly,'' he said during a break.

He told the judge he makes ``25 ounces of gold per month'' in his new job and that the cash equivalent was about $8,500 to $9,000.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Lactivism
This thread is locked  
Mothering › Forums › Breastfeeding › Lactivism › News update on driving while breastfeeding