This is my tale of wo.
My DD who is 4 years old has had some gastro symptoms for a while now. She has a very distended belly, extreme amounts of gas, loosish stools that are usually kind of pale with undigested bits of food in them.
I started taking her to a chiropractor who does some alternative testing and she suggested a stool test, which would tell us if she was having absoprtion problems. The test was done by metametrix and it came back that she is sensitive to gluten.
We decided to do a re-test through a different lab for confirmation. We did the enterolab stool test & that too indicated that she was sensitive to gluten as well as dairy. Double wo.
Anyhoo, I decided to ask my ped. about the test and what he thought (mainlhy to see if I could get it covered by insurance). He said he didn't see any merit in the test and that if we wanted to test we should start with the blood test.
I figured it couldn't hurt (except for the needle). Anyhow, I was at the doc on an unrelated matter and I mentioned that I wanted a lead & iron test as well (as long as they were drawing blood anyhow). Long story short, the nurse got bad instructions from the doc & they didn't draw the blood they needed so they were only able to do the lead & iron test & NOT the test that really mattered - the gluten test.
So, would you go ahead and do the traumatic blood draw again (they had to hold her down) or would you just be satisfied with the stool test and just go ahead with the new diet (gfcf)?
My DD who is 4 years old has had some gastro symptoms for a while now. She has a very distended belly, extreme amounts of gas, loosish stools that are usually kind of pale with undigested bits of food in them.
I started taking her to a chiropractor who does some alternative testing and she suggested a stool test, which would tell us if she was having absoprtion problems. The test was done by metametrix and it came back that she is sensitive to gluten.
We decided to do a re-test through a different lab for confirmation. We did the enterolab stool test & that too indicated that she was sensitive to gluten as well as dairy. Double wo.
Anyhoo, I decided to ask my ped. about the test and what he thought (mainlhy to see if I could get it covered by insurance). He said he didn't see any merit in the test and that if we wanted to test we should start with the blood test.
I figured it couldn't hurt (except for the needle). Anyhow, I was at the doc on an unrelated matter and I mentioned that I wanted a lead & iron test as well (as long as they were drawing blood anyhow). Long story short, the nurse got bad instructions from the doc & they didn't draw the blood they needed so they were only able to do the lead & iron test & NOT the test that really mattered - the gluten test.
So, would you go ahead and do the traumatic blood draw again (they had to hold her down) or would you just be satisfied with the stool test and just go ahead with the new diet (gfcf)?











