Mothering › Forums › Parenting › Gentle Discipline › Are consequences punishments?
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Are consequences punishments?  

post #1 of 16
Thread Starter 
My DD is only 1. So this isn't really coming up yet. But me and DH are talking alot - trying to get on the same page. We have a weird combination of childhood experiences. For example - my parents used alot of hands off parenting (read: natural consequences) but would then spank when we 'crossed' the line. DH's parents did alot more talking about things and 'thinking' - very little in the line of consequences or punishment.

I feel like I really like the idea of moderated logical and natural consequences. DH worries that they might end up being more like punishments. Here's the example we were talking about earlier - to give some context. If a teen racks up a really large cell phone bill - I would be inclined to require the teen to work (either around the house for a decent wage - moderated, or at a different job) to pay it off. DH would be more inclined to bail the kid out and spend alot of time reminding the teen not to use the cell too much and eventually taking it away if it happened repeatedly. DH feel that the teen might see my method as a punishment

I'm not sure if this is the best example - it's just fresh in my mind.

I'm interested to hear different opinions here. Are consequences punishments?
post #2 of 16
I don't think natural and logical consequences are a punishment, per se, unless you dose them out as such. Does that make sense??

Let me explain. Using your example:

1) Teen racks up huge cell phone bill.
2) Teen should be responsible for bill (if previously discussed and agreed upon)
3) Bill is discussed and decisions on how to pay bill are left up to teen (I assume if teen is allowed free reign on phone, they are responsible enough to problem-solve in this manner)
4) Teen does not pay bill.
5) Phone is turned off.

This is a natural consequence. Your requiring the teen to get job or otherwise threatening for phone to be taken away could be construed as punishment, IMO.

Allowing teen to take responsibility for their decisions and allowing those decisions to play out is not punishment.
post #3 of 16
Well, there are two types of consequences: natural and logical. Natural simply means what would happen if you did nothing...many times as parents of young children we block the natural consequences b/c they would either hurt them or it wouldn't make any sense to them and they wouldn't learn from them (e.g., an infant touching a hot stove burner...we block that so they won't get hurt b/c the natural consequence is a 3rd degree burn). As they get older, natural consequences can be used if they don't harm anyone *and* the child would learn from it *and* it doesn't drive the parent to insanity. A natural consequence of them spending all their allowance money is that they run out of money. Will it teach them better money management skills? Maybe. Is it a natural consequence the parent can live with? Likely. Natural consequences can be punitive if they are not blocked when they should be (i.e., child is too young to learn from them).

Logical consequences, on the other hand, are *imposed* consequences. They are different from natural in that someone has to step in and actually impose them. That doesn't necessarily make them punitive, but it's important to differentiate. Logical consequences should be respectful, related to the problem, reasonable, and helpful for preventing the behaviour/problem in the future. I think your cell phone bill example is an excellent example of the "conditions" needed for logical consequences. It could, however, turn punitive if those conditions were not met. For example, if you had an unreasonable requirement of paying 5x the am't owed instead of simply the am't owed. Or if it wasn't a related consequence and you, say, took away the car for a couple weeks (that might be a logical consequence for a driving issue, but not for a cell phone issue, see?). Another punitive measure might be berating and shaming them for what they've done...that would lack the respect part of logical consequences.

So, as you can see, it really depends...natural and logical consequences can be a part of a healthy, non-punitive paradigm, or they can be punishment masked as "consequences." An article you might find helpful is Jane Nelsen's desire to swtich the terminology from "logical consequences" to "Solutions".
post #4 of 16
Thread Starter 
I agree that natural and logical are very differnt things. But I like them both. DH thinks they're 'harsh'... But he's really sensitive - the kind of kid who actually sat on his bed and thought about what he did when he was sent to his room. I was the kid who could get 20 timeouts in 1 afternoon and not learn anything.

I don't like the idea of being walked over by anyone - and that includes our kids. DH lets himself be walked over by everyone - and he thinks he promoting peace and happyness.

I agree that I think solutions are important - that's an interesting way to look at it.
post #5 of 16
We had some of the same issues between DP and I. He's the kid who didn't have a curfew in HS (I know 'cause we were dating!) and still came in at a reasonable hour because he didn't want to worry his parents (SERIOUSLY) and I was the child who snuck out my window because I was always in trouble anyway, so why not have fun??!!

We have reached a happy medium, although sometimes he has to gently lead me back to our GD ways when I get to "unhappy" or "loud". *sigh* I love that man!
post #6 of 16
Yeah, that'll probably be something you'll have to see how your child reacts. If simply discussing things is enough (and it most often is with my kids, at their age), great, if not, you can try something different and utilize natural or logical consequences. That's the great thing about GD...there's a million tools in your toolbox, and each parent/child relationship will utilize different ones.
post #7 of 16
To me taking the phone is punishment. Paying your own bill is just being responsible.
post #8 of 16
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by SublimeBirthGirl View Post
To me taking the phone is punishment. Paying your own bill is just being responsible.
His argument is that the teen is obviously not ready for the responsibility of a phone. So taking it away is like taking away the temptation to do an irresponsible thing.

His parent's babied him. His mom still packed him lunches all throughout university so that he wouldn't be 'rushed' in the mornings. (A bit of a shock when I laughed at him the first time he asked me if I would be willing to do that after we got married)

My parents let me fly to visit relatives in Europe on my own when I was 14 and were confident in my abilities.
post #9 of 16
I don't get it.

If they're not ready for the responsibility of a phone, they shouldn't have one, IMO.
post #10 of 16
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by attachedmamaof3 View Post
I don't get it.

If they're not ready for the responsibility of a phone, they shouldn't have one, IMO.
In some cases you might not know they weren't ready until they screw up. You might think they were ready - but accident happen.
post #11 of 16
i'll go out on a limb here and say that in my view that both "natural" and logical consequences are forms of punishment. To artificially not participate in a situation does not seem so natural to me.

For me the bigger deal is to focus on the action that a child has taken and the looking at what it is a consequence of.

In the phone example –*was there a need to assert independence; did they literally just lose track of price/ cost; was there an important call that they felt they needed to make; are they feeling under social pressure to keep communication up with friends etc etc?

At this point discussing with the child about the implications and working together to come up with solutions that work for us all.

If the child was intentionally ignoring the impact on me & my bank account id be more worried about the lack of connection that existed there... and in my view punishments (and "consequences") would potentially widen that disconnection gap, even if in the short term it did get the desired behavioural results (ie cheaper phone bills)... in my view there are bigger things at stake and the connection between myself and my children is the key issue!

all the best
arun

-----
http://www.theparentingpit.com
post #12 of 16
Quote:
Originally Posted by canadiyank View Post
An article you might find helpful is Jane Nelsen's desire to swtich the terminology from "logical consequences" to "Solutions".
Wow! I found this article clearly articulates a shift toward *helping* to create solutions!! Thank you so much for sharing it.


Pat
post #13 of 16
Quote:
Originally Posted by WuWei View Post
Wow! I found this article clearly articulates a shift toward *helping* to create solutions!! Thank you so much for sharing it.


Pat

I agree, that is a very good article. Thank you for the link
post #14 of 16
I like this article on Nat'l Consequences a lot:

http://www.naturalchild.org/guest/rue_kream2.html
post #15 of 16
Quote:
Originally Posted by SublimeBirthGirl View Post
To me taking the phone is punishment. Paying your own bill is just being responsible.
Yeah, I'd see taking the phone away as being a sort of punishment. Unless, of course, it was part of a solution that was thought up by the child.

I can see how "making" a teen pay for their part of the cell phone could possibly be seen as punitive, but I tend to think that many teens would feel the responsibility to pay for their own mistakes. Especially if it was set up in advance that charges over the basic amount would be their responsibility, and they have a say in how they will make things right.

I guess that technically, if it's enforced and the child doesn't agree with it, then it would be a punishment/consequence...maybe...but I'm pretty sure that one wouldn't be required to allow a teen to rack up large phone bills, in order to be non-punitive.
post #16 of 16
In your example, I agree that taking the phone feels more like punishment. Working to pay of some or all of the bill is teaching a child to take responsibility for their actions. If they are not capable of that, or if it happens repeatedly, then taking the phone away is a reasonable consequence because that's what will happen in real life. If you don't pay your bills, you get evicted. If you don't pay your cell phone bill, it gets turned off. Now, with a teen, they might not have the money to pay an outrageous bill immediately, and that's where a parent can step in, and then expect them to work off the balance. That's not mean. That's helping them in a time of need and having them learn from the consequences of their actions.

I also think it depends on the child. I was the child who would learn from talking. My brother was not. It also depends on the age of the child. A 3 year old often needs to experience things.

Two examples (because I'm procrastinating from grading papers ugh).
#1 Last weekend, dd and I went to a Mother-Daughter brunch at church. After the brunch she wanted to play with a couple of her friends for a bit, so we stopped off in the nursery. She took off her 'church shoes' and ran around in her tights.

When it was time to go home, I asked her to put her shoes on. She refused. I suggested that I help, she refused. I told her "It's raining out, if you go out without your shoes, your feet will get wet." She ran outside without her shoes.

Her tights got wet. She had a major fit because she wanted them dry. I sympathized. I offered to take off her wet tights. She had a major meltdown because she wanted her tights dry right then! (I didn't have extra tights and we were a 5 minute drive from home, so it wasn't an issue of major, long term discomfort.)

However, the next time I asked her to put her shoes on and she refused, I reminded her that her feet would get wet, and she put them on. She had to experience the natural consequence of wet feet before she 'got it'. We've been through the same with cold and rain.


#2 When my brother was in high school, he began playing poker at lunch with a crowd of boys. My brother was (and is) a kind, gentle soul who always sees the best in people. But he was also not very popular and thought playing poker with these boys would make him (more) popular. What happened in reality is that he racked up $100 in debts to these miscreants and they began calling him at home demanding money.

When my parents found out, they did three things:
1) Immediately talked to the school to put a stop to the gambling. (It had happened in the lunch room which wasn't all that well supervised)
2) Had a long talk with my brother about trust, gambling and healthy skepticism. (Which resulted in one of the famous lines in our family. "When you sit down to gamble, look around the table and find the sucker. If you can't find one, get up and leave, because you're it!)
3) Made my brother get a job to earn the $100 he owed.

Now, they could have stopped at 2. But they felt it was important for him to experience the consequences of racking up debt to unsavory people. For him, talking wasn't enough. He needed to have to work for a whole week of spring break and then see that money disappear before he "got it".

He's never gambled again. He did have some periods in his early 20s where he spent beyond his means because the guys at work were pressuring him to do the cool thing. Once again, my parents didn't bail him out, but helped him work out a payment plan (which included cutting up his credit cards).

My parents didn't 'punish' him in the traditional sense, they didn't forbid gambling. They did help him understand the consequences of his actions at a level where it wasn't going to ruin his life. If they had bailed him out, it was entirely possible that he would have continued to rack up debts when he was out of school until he got to a point where he would have had to declare bankruptcy (he's not got a lot of internal discipline, as much as I love him).

He's now got a successful job, owns a house and is able to live within his means (with a little help from his wife!).
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Gentle Discipline
This thread is locked  
Mothering › Forums › Parenting › Gentle Discipline › Are consequences punishments?