Mothering › Mothering Discussion Forums › Natural Family Living › Diapering › Anyone tried the Bummis Super Brite?
New Posts  All Forums:
 

Anyone tried the Bummis Super Brite?

post #1 of 36
12/9/07 at 3:04pm
Thread Starter 
Well? I don't know if they are worth purchasing, and I'd hate to buy them without some positive reviews!

You may also like:

Healing Teeth Naturally Guide
There Is Not Always a "Fix" For the Difficult Child
10 Things You Don't Need For a New Baby
post #2 of 36
12/9/07 at 4:05pm
I haven't seen them for sale yet.
post #3 of 36
12/9/07 at 4:11pm
I want one super bad, but haven't been able to buy one yet.
post #4 of 36
12/9/07 at 5:13pm
The print looks cute, but I haven't seen them for sale yet either. The Bummis web site says they went on sale Nov. 30.
post #5 of 36
12/9/07 at 10:19pm
I was just wondering this--has anyone seen them available yet? My LO has outgrown his small covers, and I really want to try the Super Brite in medium...
post #6 of 36
12/9/07 at 10:29pm
I just googled it b/c I was curious and found it here:

http://www.diaperjunction.com/store/...idproduct=2718
post #7 of 36
12/12/07 at 2:54pm
I'm going to get some! I found them here:

http://www.newandgreen.com/Bummis_Super_Brites_cat.html

http://www.greenmountaindiapers.com/covers.htm
-Available 12/14

Now I just have to get some money...
post #8 of 36
12/13/07 at 12:10am
I'm waiting for them to come to Nicki's so I can get free shipping!
post #9 of 36
12/13/07 at 2:39pm
Natural babies has them, even larges.
http://store.naturalbabies.com/store/Default.asp
post #10 of 36
12/13/07 at 3:04pm
It appears that they have sold out in most places.
post #11 of 36
12/13/07 at 5:33pm
Cottontail Baby has them too and she has awesome, fast service! But darn it, I want a medium white Guess I'm going to have to wait patiently....
post #12 of 36
12/13/07 at 6:23pm
they are available at www.thebabymarketplace.com
post #13 of 36
12/13/07 at 6:51pm
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Micheliala View Post
Cottontail Baby has them too and she has awesome, fast service! But darn it, I want a medium white Guess I'm going to have to wait patiently....
White? I thought these were all prints?
post #14 of 36
12/13/07 at 8:17pm
Anxious for babe to arrive so I can choose my final color.
post #15 of 36
12/13/07 at 11:09pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by sheilajolene View Post
White? I thought these were all prints?
4 prints plus white.
post #16 of 36
12/14/07 at 12:43am
I have one coming in the mail from Diaper Junction. I'm curious how they will fit with the gussets (regular BSIWW never worked well because of the gape in the legs).
post #17 of 36
12/14/07 at 1:54pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by MyLittleWonders View Post
I have one coming in the mail from Diaper Junction. I'm curious how they will fit with the gussets (regular BSIWW never worked well because of the gape in the legs).
yeah, us too (gapping in the legs).. so I've been really excited to try these! you'll have to let us know what you think and if anyone sees any white ones in medium (PM me )
post #18 of 36
12/14/07 at 3:12pm

Bummis SB Review

Hi there,
I have had a chance to try them. My dtr is going to be one in 3 days and she is really tiny with tiny thighs. So the SB is great for her legs, no more gaps! The material is thinner than the SWW as there is no poly knit laminated to the inside of the cover. So it's a bit trimmer. I use it with fitteds (mostly bamboozles and AMP hemps) and snappied on hemp flats so none of the inside touches her skin. I think it would feel nicer for her to have a SWW on if the inside of the cover touched her - perhaps if you trifolded a prefold in there... I also think that if you are trifolding a prefold, the poly knit on the inside of a SWW would hold it in place a little better....
I find that the leg casings seem softer but I think this is just a function of them being more flexible as the material is thinner.
I think it would also work great for escaped poop (esp nb poop) as you could wash it down on the inside really easily.
And the best thing is that they come in PINK - so girly and nice for a change. I give Bummis two thumbs up for this design. Oh and the other nice thing that is a change from the SWW is that the NB size has a notch for your baby's umbilical stump.
Hope that helps.
Karen
post #19 of 36
12/14/07 at 7:04pm
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by NewandGreenBaby View Post
Hi there,
I've got them in at my store New & Green Baby Co. and have had a chance to try them. My dtr is going to be one in 3 days and she is really tiny with tiny thighs. So the SB is great for her legs, no more gaps! The material is thinner than the SWW as there is no poly knit laminated to the inside of the cover. So it's a bit trimmer. I use it with fitteds (mostly bamboozles and AMP hemps) and snappied on hemp flats so none of the inside touches her skin. I think it would feel nicer for her to have a SWW on if the inside of the cover touched her - perhaps if you trifolded a prefold in there... I also think that if you are trifolding a prefold, the poly knit on the inside of a SWW would hold it in place a little better....
I find that the leg casings seem softer but I think this is just a function of them being more flexible as the material is thinner.
I think it would also work great for escaped poop (esp nb poop) as you could wash it down on the inside really easily.
And the best thing is that they come in PINK - so girly and nice for a change. I give Bummis two thumbs up for this design. Oh and the other nice thing that is a change from the SWW is that the NB size has a notch for your baby's umbilical stump.
Hope that helps.
Karen
Thank you! I just purchased one. I wanted to get two, but I had to reign myself in until I tried them.
post #20 of 36
12/14/07 at 11:02pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by NewandGreenBaby View Post
Hi there,
I've got them in at my store New & Green Baby Co. and have had a chance to try them. My dtr is going to be one in 3 days and she is really tiny with tiny thighs. So the SB is great for her legs, no more gaps! The material is thinner than the SWW as there is no poly knit laminated to the inside of the cover. So it's a bit trimmer. I use it with fitteds (mostly bamboozles and AMP hemps) and snappied on hemp flats so none of the inside touches her skin. I think it would feel nicer for her to have a SWW on if the inside of the cover touched her - perhaps if you trifolded a prefold in there... I also think that if you are trifolding a prefold, the poly knit on the inside of a SWW would hold it in place a little better....
I find that the leg casings seem softer but I think this is just a function of them being more flexible as the material is thinner.
I think it would also work great for escaped poop (esp nb poop) as you could wash it down on the inside really easily.
And the best thing is that they come in PINK - so girly and nice for a change. I give Bummis two thumbs up for this design. Oh and the other nice thing that is a change from the SWW is that the NB size has a notch for your baby's umbilical stump.
Hope that helps.
Karen
MAN. I was REALLY hoping that they had the same thickness of the BSWW. So basically, these are exactly like thirsties.
New Posts  All Forums:
 
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Diapering

You may also like:

Healing Teeth Naturally Guide
There Is Not Always a "Fix" For the Difficult Child
10 Things You Don't Need For a New Baby
Mothering › Mothering Discussion Forums › Natural Family Living › Diapering › Anyone tried the Bummis Super Brite?