there are several articles in the bigger journals and it continutes to what degree I am not sure but in 2003 it was done in about 90% of the schools-- and it appears that OB clerkship has a negative impact as far as regarding patient's rights ---
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003 Feb;188(2):575-9.
Comment in:
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003 Dec;189(6):1808; author reply 1808-9.
Don't ask, don't tell: a change in medical student attitudes after
obstetrics/gynecology clerkships toward seeking consent for pelvic examinations on an anesthetized patient.
Ubel PA, Jepson C, Silver-Isenstadt A.
Veterans Affairs Health Services Research and Development Center of Excellence, Veterans Affairs Ann Arbor Healthcare System, USA.
paubel@med.umich.edu
OBJECTIVE: We explore whether the completion of an obstetrics/gynecology
clerkship is associated with a decline in the importance that students place on
seeking permission from the patient before conducting a pelvic examination while she is anesthetized. STUDY DESIGN: Students at five Philadelphia area medical schools (n = 401 students) were asked how important it would be for a patient to be told that a medical student will perform a pelvic examination while she is anesthetized. We examined associations between the completion of an obstetrics/gynecology clerkship and attitudes toward consent with the use of linear regression to adjust for gender and the total amount of clerkship
experience. RESULTS: After the data were controlled for gender and the total
number of clerkships that had been completed, we found that students who had completed an obstetrics/gynecology clerkship thought that consent was
significantly less important than did those students who had not completed a
clerkship (P =.01). CONCLUSION: To avoid this decline in attitudes toward seeking consent, clerkship directors should ensure that students perform examinations only after patients have given consent explicitly.
PMID: 12592274 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
===============================
J Okla State Med Assoc. 2005 Aug;98(8):386-8.
Ethics versus education: pelvic exams on anesthetized women.
Schniederjan S, Donovan GK.
University of Oklahoma College of Medicine, USA.
In a survey of junior and senior medical students at the University of Oklahoma, a large majority of respondents reported having performed pelvic exams on anesthetized gynecologic surgery patients. Nearly three-quarters also reported believing that these patients had not specifically consented to undergo exams by students during their surgical procedures. While some students and medical educators maintain that pelvic exams under anesthesia are necessary for the development of students' examination skills, this assertion has not gone unquestioned. Serious ethical concerns have been raised by members of the medical community and women's advocacy groups, and the practice was recently outlawed in one state. Despite this widespread opposition, non-consented pelvic examinations evidently remain a common practice in US teaching hospitals. Our consideration of this controversial issue leads us to conclude that explicit, informed consent must be obtained in order for pelvic examinations to be performed on surgical patients, or risk compromising the doctor-patient relationship.
PMID: 16206868 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]