I saw the article earlier today & I came here looking for the thread

Honestly, I thought the article was pretty positive.
In one of the last paragraphs it mentions that the proposed trial lacks the necessary support. It isn't going to happen--at least not for now.
It raised some good questions and brought out some real points--namely that doctors choose c/s for the patients for litigious reasons.
I am disappointed in the last paragraph--the speculation that c/s might reduce pelvic floor issues & urinary incontinence later in life. Just a couple of weeks ago the NY Times ran an article about pelvic floor re-education after birth. Apparently France pays for every woman to have a personal Kegel trainer after she gives birth. I bet that's more cost effective than unnecessary surgery
