Mothering › Forums › Breastfeeding › Lactivism › So...Someone Thinks this is Funny, Huh?
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

So...Someone Thinks this is Funny, Huh?  

post #1 of 10
Thread Starter 
from humorist Nora Ephron in last weekend's New York Times:

Quote:
I will confess a bias: I’ve never understood the religious fervor that surrounds breast-feeding. There are fanatics out there who believe you should breast-feed your child until he or she is old enough to unbutton your blouse. Their success in conning a huge number of women into believing this is one of the truly grim things about modern life. Anyway, one of the main reasons given for breast-feeding is that breast-fed children are less prone to allergies. But children today are far more allergic than they were when I was growing up, when far fewer women breast-fed their children. I mean, what is it with all these children dropping dead from sniffing a peanut? This is new, friends, it’s brand-new new, and don’t believe anyone who says otherwise. So: is it possible that breast-feeding causes allergies?
Full article

In the interests of full disclosure, I am breast-feeding children who are almost old enough to unbutton my blouse but who seem to prefer the "yank shirt up" technique.

I wonder if instead she had written something like:

There are fanatics out there who believe you should put your child in a car seat until he or she is 6 years old. Their success in conning a huge number of women into believing this is one of the truly grim things about modern life. Anyway, one of the main reasons given for using a car seat is that strapped in children are less prone to getting hurt. But children today are far more violent than they were when I was growing up, when far fewer women used car seats.

if it would have been "funny".
post #2 of 10
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zadee View Post
In the interests of full disclosure, I am breast-feeding children who are almost old enough to unbutton my blouse but who seem to prefer the "yank shirt up" technique.
post #3 of 10
ohhh send your spin on it to the new york times editors....
post #4 of 10
Her logic doesn't make sense...Breast feeding isn't a brand new thing, so why would it be causing brand new allergies?


brain...exploding...

eta: read the whole article, but the things she was comparing it too seemed to make more sense. xD
post #5 of 10
It's supposed to be tongue in cheek.
post #6 of 10
Thread Starter 
Tessie -- I do get that. I also think if she were being tongue in cheek about how dreadful it is to bully people into using a car seat (to use my earlier example) it wouldn't be acceptable in the way that complaining about extended breastfeeding is acceptable.
post #7 of 10
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zadee View Post
Tessie -- I do get that. I also think if she were being tongue in cheek about how dreadful it is to bully people into using a car seat (to use my earlier example) it wouldn't be acceptable in the way that complaining about extended breastfeeding is acceptable.
I get that in your opinion it isn't acceptable, however I think the paragraph on breastfeeding should be taken in context. I also realise that she admits that she doesn't like the lactivist message regarding extended breastfeeding - but I kind of agree with her in a way. Breast is best, but I do sometimes think that the lactivist message would be better understood if it was a little gentler, a little more supportive, rather than the proclamation that if you don't breastfeed until your child is at school you're a baaaaaaaad mother. (Not saying anyone here is guilty of this but I've certainly encountered this in the past.)
post #8 of 10
my ds could unbutton my buttons at 5mths old....... should i have weaned him then because he was to smart?

:
post #9 of 10
yeah, this chapped by a$$! But while the whole article is an example of a certain kind of logical fallacy and did seem tongue-in-cheek, I hate to see this same totally freakin' bogus anti-bf message anywhere - let alone on the ed page of my New York Times!
post #10 of 10
Yeah that's HI-larious.


NOT.

Seriously we get enough of this baloney from everyone around us. Numerous studies have PROVEN breastfeeding has many benefits, besides lowering *risk* of allergies, why keep harassing people who want those benefits?

And another thing, back when there weren't as many "kill-me-dead" allergies, they weren't jabbing needles into newborns as soon as they cleared the perineum and every 4 weeks or so after that for a whole year. Yet you don't see satirical sarcatic commentary about THAT in the NYT do you?

Maybe you do, I dont read the NYT regularly enough to know.

It just seems like BF is quicker to be criticized than vaccines, and oddly enough no one is making money off BFing mothers (yes, I know the societal benefits also have economical benefits, but there's no clear "money trail" to follow with BF). But vaccines on the other hand are a cash cow for quite a lot of powerful people.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Lactivism
This thread is locked  
Mothering › Forums › Breastfeeding › Lactivism › So...Someone Thinks this is Funny, Huh?