I think we all agree that a mother and her baby should be able to nurse whenever and wherever they need to. That's a true need, and it's not negotiable for many reasons that have been well-covered . . . it's not reasonable to expect a mother to stay home until her baby is weaned, to carry a bottle, or to expect that the baby will even TAKE a bottle, etc.
But some people seem to have a judgemental attitude toward any woman who chooses to cover herself and/or her baby with a blanket while NIP, because they're "fostering the idea that women should cover when nursing" or something like that. Why shouldn't I cover up if it makes me more comfortable? Why would it be wrong of me to accommodate others' comfort levels by making a minimum effort to provide some sort of visual barrier if it doesn't create undue hardship for me?
I completely understand why people would be against a law that required women to be "discreet" when NIP, because it could be abused and because discretion is subjective and open to interpretation. So IMHO laws should just say that a woman can breastfeed her child anywhere the woman and baby are both authorized to be, without mentioning discretion or anything like that.
But apart from the law, why do some women seem to feel almost a moral obligation to completely refuse to make any accommodation, no matter how minor, to anyone else's level of discomfort with seeing them breastfeed?
In my opinion, nursing the baby is a need. Nursing the baby without making any effort to screen the process in any way from uncomfortable eyes is IMHO a preference, not a need. I don't think my preference automatically trumps everyone else's needs or comfort just because I'm nursing.
I understand the issue that some babies won't tolerate being covered with a blanket. And expecting someone to nurse in the bathroom is unreasonable for both comfort and hygeine reasons.
But, for instance, would people here see a problem with a restaurant bringing out a lovely decorative screen to shield a nursing mom and baby from the rest of the guests? Would that violate her rights or harm her or the baby in any way? It doesn't seem to me that it would.
There's always a lot of debate about how people behave in other people's homes. To me, being in someone else's home is a somewhat unique situation. If I am visiting in someone else's home and I become offended or uncomfortable, I can leave. If they uncomfortable or offended by something a guest does, where can they go? They can't leave and go home--they ARE home.
If I was at someone else's house and they asked me not to nurse in their home I would be shocked and offended, and I would think it was wrong of them, but I would leave. I wouldn't insist on sitting there nursing my baby and refuse to leave their home.
I actually had this happen to me once. The person I was visiting was so uncomfortable with the idea of breastfeeding that they didn't want me to do it anywhere in their home, even if they couldn't see it happening. So I nursed in my car and then I left. And I would not be comfortable visiting in their home with a nursling, ever again.
But I don't quite understand why some people feel that being asked to be discreet is exactly the same thing as being asked not to nurse, period. To me it's not at all the same. I have a huge problem with being asked not to feed my baby. But I don't have a problem at all with making sure the spot where my baby is latched onto the breast is not in the direct, full line of vision of someone I know is uncomfortable around breastfeeding.
With the exception of that one person who didn't want me nursing anywhere in their home even if they couldn't see it, I've always been able to find a solution that balanced the needs and comfort of everyone present. Almost always, I've been able to do this in a way that doesn't require my missing out on huge chunks of the social event.
Usually I just cover the baby with a blanket or turn my body away from the uncomfortable person a bit. And/or I'll seat myself so that my husband is blocking any direct view from the unfomfortable person to my nursling. I've been known to take a chair and put it so that I'm sitting behind the uncomfortable person, or sit just around a corner so I can still hear and take part in the conversation without giving them a view of my breast in case the baby pulls off suddenly and looks around (as my little socialite is apt to do).
Obviously people can go too far, and if I've made a reasonable effort to at least attempt to accommodate the other person's squeamishness and they're still uncomfortable, oh well. At that point I figure I've fulfilled what's required by politeness and courtesy. If my breasts are not at risk of becoming open to view and they're still not happy, that's probably their problem. If at that point they asked me to do something I felt was unreasonable or compromised my ability to feed my child, I would probably explain why I felt it was unreasonable and then leave if I couldn't bring them around.
I have seen people disrobe to the waist to nurse or pump.
If someone did that in my home I would never dream of telling her that she couldn't pump, nurse, or whatever she needed to do in my home, or that she couldn't take off whatever she needed to to do that.
But if she had completely taken her shirt and bra off in front of my husband and my other guests and refused to cover up or go elsewhere to do it, I would have thought that highly inappropriate and would have asked her to find some way to be more discreet.
I know that some people would equate my asking her not to take her shirt off in my living room as being equal to my refusing to allow her to feed my baby in my home at all, anywhere. I just don't see how it's the same thing.
Why do some people seem to think that asking someone to be discreet is exactly the same as asking them not to breastfeed?
But some people seem to have a judgemental attitude toward any woman who chooses to cover herself and/or her baby with a blanket while NIP, because they're "fostering the idea that women should cover when nursing" or something like that. Why shouldn't I cover up if it makes me more comfortable? Why would it be wrong of me to accommodate others' comfort levels by making a minimum effort to provide some sort of visual barrier if it doesn't create undue hardship for me?
I completely understand why people would be against a law that required women to be "discreet" when NIP, because it could be abused and because discretion is subjective and open to interpretation. So IMHO laws should just say that a woman can breastfeed her child anywhere the woman and baby are both authorized to be, without mentioning discretion or anything like that.
But apart from the law, why do some women seem to feel almost a moral obligation to completely refuse to make any accommodation, no matter how minor, to anyone else's level of discomfort with seeing them breastfeed?
In my opinion, nursing the baby is a need. Nursing the baby without making any effort to screen the process in any way from uncomfortable eyes is IMHO a preference, not a need. I don't think my preference automatically trumps everyone else's needs or comfort just because I'm nursing.
I understand the issue that some babies won't tolerate being covered with a blanket. And expecting someone to nurse in the bathroom is unreasonable for both comfort and hygeine reasons.
But, for instance, would people here see a problem with a restaurant bringing out a lovely decorative screen to shield a nursing mom and baby from the rest of the guests? Would that violate her rights or harm her or the baby in any way? It doesn't seem to me that it would.
There's always a lot of debate about how people behave in other people's homes. To me, being in someone else's home is a somewhat unique situation. If I am visiting in someone else's home and I become offended or uncomfortable, I can leave. If they uncomfortable or offended by something a guest does, where can they go? They can't leave and go home--they ARE home.
If I was at someone else's house and they asked me not to nurse in their home I would be shocked and offended, and I would think it was wrong of them, but I would leave. I wouldn't insist on sitting there nursing my baby and refuse to leave their home.
I actually had this happen to me once. The person I was visiting was so uncomfortable with the idea of breastfeeding that they didn't want me to do it anywhere in their home, even if they couldn't see it happening. So I nursed in my car and then I left. And I would not be comfortable visiting in their home with a nursling, ever again.
But I don't quite understand why some people feel that being asked to be discreet is exactly the same thing as being asked not to nurse, period. To me it's not at all the same. I have a huge problem with being asked not to feed my baby. But I don't have a problem at all with making sure the spot where my baby is latched onto the breast is not in the direct, full line of vision of someone I know is uncomfortable around breastfeeding.
With the exception of that one person who didn't want me nursing anywhere in their home even if they couldn't see it, I've always been able to find a solution that balanced the needs and comfort of everyone present. Almost always, I've been able to do this in a way that doesn't require my missing out on huge chunks of the social event.
Usually I just cover the baby with a blanket or turn my body away from the uncomfortable person a bit. And/or I'll seat myself so that my husband is blocking any direct view from the unfomfortable person to my nursling. I've been known to take a chair and put it so that I'm sitting behind the uncomfortable person, or sit just around a corner so I can still hear and take part in the conversation without giving them a view of my breast in case the baby pulls off suddenly and looks around (as my little socialite is apt to do).
Obviously people can go too far, and if I've made a reasonable effort to at least attempt to accommodate the other person's squeamishness and they're still uncomfortable, oh well. At that point I figure I've fulfilled what's required by politeness and courtesy. If my breasts are not at risk of becoming open to view and they're still not happy, that's probably their problem. If at that point they asked me to do something I felt was unreasonable or compromised my ability to feed my child, I would probably explain why I felt it was unreasonable and then leave if I couldn't bring them around.
I have seen people disrobe to the waist to nurse or pump.
If someone did that in my home I would never dream of telling her that she couldn't pump, nurse, or whatever she needed to do in my home, or that she couldn't take off whatever she needed to to do that.
But if she had completely taken her shirt and bra off in front of my husband and my other guests and refused to cover up or go elsewhere to do it, I would have thought that highly inappropriate and would have asked her to find some way to be more discreet.
I know that some people would equate my asking her not to take her shirt off in my living room as being equal to my refusing to allow her to feed my baby in my home at all, anywhere. I just don't see how it's the same thing.
Why do some people seem to think that asking someone to be discreet is exactly the same as asking them not to breastfeed?











:
Follow Mothering