or Connect
Mothering › Mothering Forums › Archives › Miscellaneous › Activism Archives › I voted NO!
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

I voted NO!

post #1 of 74
Thread Starter 
http://www.cnn.com/POLLSERVER/results/4942.html

just a little online poll, but i am angry that the yes's are ahead. Join me if you wish and vote no for love

Blessings, Sunny
post #2 of 74
Can you post where we can vote. The above link just took me to the results

TIA,
Kay
post #3 of 74
nak

Yes, please post the link or tell hoe to get to the actual voting spot.

I think it's great that the yeses are ahead. Marriage is a union of one man and one woman, nothing else.
post #4 of 74
Quote:
Originally posted by gardenmommy

Marriage is a union of one man and one woman, nothing else.
Why is that?
post #5 of 74
This is nice:
http://www.hrc.org/millionformarriag...inal/story.asp


I think the poll is dead. I have not been able to vote for a while. Here is the orig story with poll.

http://www.cnn.com/2003/ALLPOLITICS/...age/index.html


El
post #6 of 74
I'll say no as well, since I'm a gay-loving sexual deviant.:
post #7 of 74
I think it's funny that people think humans are only male or female.

Sexuality, including physical sexuality, is on a continuum.

There are lots of people who are not genetically male or female.
post #8 of 74
Flame me if you will, but I believe it is because that is the way we have been created. I know that many here disagree with this point of view, however, I believe that God ordained marriage as a completion of men and women. Not men and men, or women and women.
post #9 of 74
Edited for the mods
post #10 of 74
On the contrary, Amazlilith, I am quite happy. And content, and very much at peace with my world. If you knew me, you would be able to see that.
post #11 of 74
I can not fathom why anyone would deny another family the rights AND responsibilities that others take for granted. And don't use GOD as an excuse, because I don't agree. I am tired of people who are so self righteous that they can not see beyond their little world. I could care less if you agree with my life, but that doesn't give you or anyone else the right to consider my family less than ...
post #12 of 74
In my opinion, civil marriage is a legal contract, and thus, how can you restrict what type of consenting adults can enter into a legal contract with one another?

Church marriages, on the other hand, can be anything they'd like, and churches should have the right to refuse a church wedding to anyone they don't want to marry.

It's not the government's place to legislate morality.
post #13 of 74
Quote:
Originally posted by gardenmommy
Flame me if you will, but I believe it is because that is the way we have been created. I know that many here disagree with this point of view, however, I believe that God ordained marriage as a completion of men and women. Not men and men, or women and women.
Thanks for answering. Now, help me out: how is it "a completion" of men and women?
post #14 of 74
Thread Starter 
darn it the poll was working this morning, sorry everyone. Still a good debate topic.

gardenmommy, I have a question for you. Do you eat shell fish?
post #15 of 74
Um, can we watch the tone of this thread?

I understand some of us are going to disagree about this issue but can we keep it to a peaceful discussion?
post #16 of 74
Quote:
Originally posted by abimommy
can we keep it to a peaceful discussion?
I don't think this topic will ever be discussed peaceefully and with respect.

Ever.

Because there are those that take the bible as fact and those of us that allow the people around them to think for themselves.

It's an angry topic.

Quote:
In my opinion, civil marriage is a legal contract, and thus, how can you restrict what type of consenting adults can enter into a legal contract with one another?

Church marriages, on the other hand, can be anything they'd like, and churches should have the right to refuse a church wedding to anyone they don't want to marry.
Yes.
post #17 of 74

Shellfish

In case you are wondering what the deal with the "do you eat shell fish?" question was about... I am sure the poster was going to get to it, but just in case gardenmommy didn't feel inclined to answer... (forgive me Sunnydrop for being a spoiler...)

The scripture often pointed to by those who believe that homosexuality is a sin, which says "Thou shalt not lie with a man as thou would with a woman" is found in the middle of a list of all kinds of forbidden acts such as eating rare meat, pork and shellfish; wearing clothes of mixed fabric, the hybridization of cattle; planting seeds of two plants in the same field, not cutting the hair on the sides of your head, having sex while a woman is on her period, etc. (this is all in Leviticus 18-21, etc.) (many of these rules are followed by some fundamentalist jewish faiths, but generally not by christian religions). This section of the Bible also tells us to kill all divorced people who remarry; and to put to death all adulters; to banish all those who have sex while the woman in having menses....

I find it very hypocritical for christians to point to the bible selectively, to say "God says that to be gay is a sin", but not to recognize that, right there in the same scripture, it clearly states that your dinner at Red lobster is a rule laid down by god which you have broken...

I am completely "pro-gay" (if that's a word) just so my position is clear... (and I am not a "christian", though I am spiritual, if that matters to this discussion...)

I do not agree with people who base their life and decisions on the words of a book (the bible), but I respect their decision to do so if they choose. What I do not respect, however, is those who claim to live their lives based on the bible, who claim that the bible is the "word of god" and that everything in it is a total, unquestionable truth, who judge and condemn other people by pointing to passages, but who allow themselves selectively ignore sections of the bible that don't fit in with their beliefs.

I believe that Christians either need to say that the bible is a spiritual guide, that holds the stories and opinions of many people, and which can, if used correctly, be referred to for inspiration, just as can all other spiritual and philosphical works (like the Koran, Plato, Socrates, Bertrand Russell, the book of the dead, ... you get the idea), but that it is not the actual "Word of God" OR they need to say/believe that it is the "Word of God" and live according to the whole book, not just those selective passages that serve their purposes...

Anyway, my point is, that for those people who base their belief that homosexuality is a "sin" only on the bible, I think those beliefs should be examined more closely. For those who think homosexuality is just "gross" or something, well, there is little that can be said to that, other than just that 1) I disagree with you, 2) that you should open your minds, how is love between two consenting adults "gross", and 3) that unless what you think is "gross" is actually harmful and detrimental to other people (which being gay clearly is not), whether or not you personally think something is "gross" should have no impact or influence on the laws or equal treatment of people.

OK, that's all for now... sorry for the rant...I realize that the vast majority of the posts on this thread are pro-gay and pro-gay rights...


post #18 of 74
Thread Starter 
lol thanks for explain the whole shell fish comment. Saves me time typing. so I always ask people who use god as a reason that question.

Also, would like to point out God nor Jesus NEVER said one thing about being gay a sin. Not one thing about that in the bible quoted from Jesus.

would would Jesus do? Love Gays too

ohh and for the reocrd I am a recovering Catholic, but still very spirtual.

Hi abi i will be good I promise

Blessings, Sunny
post #19 of 74
Quote:
In my opinion, civil marriage is a legal contract, and thus, how can you restrict what type of consenting adults can enter into a legal contract with one another?
ITA!!!

I think there needs to be new termonology entered into this rhelm. There would be "marriage" which is a religious ceremony and individual religions/groups would decide who could enter into this (much like they do with baptism/holy orders/etc...). Meanwhile, there would be legal/civil definition of adult partnership (whatever) where people agree to be legally responsible for and to each other. This should not be based on the idea of sex or procreation, IMO.

Furthermore, even if I did believe homosexuality/trans-sexuality was wrong, I would not try to outlaw it. God gave humans FREE WILL/choice and it is not up to me to remove the choices that God has given. That is between God & that person, and if anothers choices do not effect me I should have nothing to say about them.

Kay

Kay
post #20 of 74
No, I don't eat shellfish, for the record.

As far as allowing God to enter the discussion, why shouldn't He? This is a discussion in the spirituality forum, and I stated my beliefs. I find it interesting that it's ok for others to post beliefs that are offensive to me, but that I'm not allowed the same privilege without others taking umbrage at my postings.

I do believe the whole Bible is the inspired Word of God; do I follow it to the letter? Of course not, I am not perfect. I strive to live according to what I've read and understood. I am not trying to be self-righteous by stating that God created marriage between a man and a woman; I can see "beyond my little world" that not everyone agrees with me. My belief in God and His infallible Word are the basis for my beliefs, as offensive to some as that may be. I do not expect others to agree with me or to like my opinions. In fact, I completely expect to be very lonely in my positions here.

And, just because I hold this position does not mean that I hate all people who have another view, nor do I believe that God hates them. On the contrary, I believe that He loves them, maybe even more than He loves me!

By the way, the government legislates morality every day: it is against the law to murder, steal, defame another's name, to molest/abuse one's children or spouse, to own another person (slavery), and to commit perjury (lie). It is absurd to say that government cannot legislate morality; if it cannot, than it has no business making or enforcing laws against the aforementioned behaviors because they are inherently moral issues.

The government does prohibit certain civil contracts between consenting adults; contracts hiring a hit man, contracts for prostitution, contracts to defraud individuals or organizations, just to name a few.

I think the real issue at hand has nothing to do with the definition of marriage. I think it is something much greater, that of absolute truth. In other words, something that is true for all peoples, in all places, at all times. We live in a society that wants to do what feels right, not necessarily what IS right; so that what feels right to me may or may not feel right to you. If it feels right for you to "marry" another person of the same gender, then it must be right, because you LOVE each other. Regardless of whether or not it actually is right.

Again, flame me if you will. This is not an easy topic to discuss, no one likes to hear negative opinions concerning their behavior/thoughts/opinions. And this is just my own opinion.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Activism Archives
Mothering › Mothering Forums › Archives › Miscellaneous › Activism Archives › I voted NO!