Yeah, the social-services comment is ridiculous. I work in strategy consulting to Fortune 500 corporations. I've pumped for a full year at work, twice now. Both the company I work for and the clients I've been assigned to work at (a major hotel chain, a top global pharma company, a beverage manufacturer, etc.) have lactation rooms and varying degrees of health services and breastfeeding support services. It is absolutely something that successful private-sector have decided to do, both because it is the "right" thing to do, because it helps retain employees (who are expensive to recruit and train), and because it reduces health care and insurance costs in the long run.
I wrote about this in the comments on the article, because I found the other comments to be so insulting and ignorant. It is extremely common at big corporations to have nurses on staff, to offer blood-pressure screenings and flu vaccines and weight-loss and smoking cessation programs. There is a relatively low per-person cost to all of these things, and an absolute bang for the buck if it helps keep employees healthy, keeps them at their desks, keeps them from quitting etc.
For people to complain about this because it is funded by ratepayers is silly. When you buy a can of soda, you are paying for PepsiCo's extensive in-house health services department and the gym at the corporate headquarters. Whatever!