Mothering › Forums › Education › Learning at School › Reggio Emilia and Montessori
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Reggio Emilia and Montessori  

post #1 of 9
Thread Starter 
I am very ignorant of the R.E. approach. I recently came across a question asking to compare the two. I'm hopeful someone on here who is more familiar with R.E. can help me and let me know if I did an OK job answering.

Here is the link:
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/in...a.6hwm4TKC.bFS
post #2 of 9

Hey Matt!!

Actually, one of my pet projects, in my gobs of spare time like yours, has been focusing on an All Day Montessori Community at DD2's Montessori school, and we have come up with a model that is like 2/3 Montessori, 1/3 Reggio. Because in thinking about the irreducible needs of children in care up to 9 or 10 hours per day, as awesomeas Montessori is, we have realized that there is a legitimite need for unstructured imaginative play (unit blocks, housekeeping and dramatic play, gardening, cooking, thematic exploration of the arts) not typically taught in Montessori training programs yet vitally important to great brain development. So OUR All Day Montessori Community will have areas for the above, bit with the ability for the directress to contain activity in the "Montessori" work area for two work cycles every day as well as unlimited opportunity for children (ages 2 and a half through 6 plus) to choose which areas to play/work in outside of the subscribed Montessori work-cycle times. We are hopeful that this new environment will minimize transitions and maximize developmental opportunities for our "All Day Community" kids.

I'll keep you updated on our successes and failures! Any helpful suggestions are welcomed!
post #3 of 9
Thread Starter 
There was a suggestion in one of my books I just read about doing an all day Montessori program. It suggested a great small booklet, but cannot remember the details right now. I will look that up soon and let you know.

The afternoon generally has to be different in some way from the morning, so you are on the right track for that. I think even with free play, it helps to have some sort of structure to it. So be sure to include that.
post #4 of 9

You know it!

Our directress plans on giving "lessons" on appropriate use of the imaginative areas as well in the first few weeks of school, as well as an adult assistant overseeing (and joining IN) play when needed to expand upon a theme (or redirect if play becomes too scripted, too TV like)

May I add, we are very excited about this program, and are applying for JOINT AMS and NAEYC accreditation next year, once we are in the "groove".
post #5 of 9
There is a school in Sacramento doing this, as well. AMAZING school/teachers/owner and as much as I love my oldest child's teachers and school, we are signing DD2 up at this Mont/RE school for the fall. You should email the owner...she's a lovely woman.

http://womontessorischool.homestead.com/
post #6 of 9
As a Montessori teacher I have some observations to share. The cooking, outside activities like gardening, and other real, hands-on activities are actually very much part of the Montessori philosophy and should be included as part of the Montessori 3-hour work-cycle whenever possible. Sometimes it's hard to allow free coming-and-going from outside areas, but if you can swing it, having those activities as free choice is ideal!

I would recommend keeping the "imaginative play" elements that are not part of the Montessori philosophy for the afternoon and out of the work period. The Montessori curriculum is very complete and trying to mix Reggio elements that do not fit the philosophy can have unexpected consequences, such as interruption of the children's "flow" experience during work, and confusion between the use of symbolic learning materials for the use of toys. See the discussion thread on Montessori and imaginitive play- I think the starter post was "are there some kids who hate Montessori?"

I tried what you are describing- giving lessons on materials that were not Montessori, but that I thought would benefit the kids, and I found that the kids were missing out on the dense curriculum already inherent in the Montessori materials. Now I only use original Montessori materials, with few exceptions.

BUT, I think it's a great idea to use Reggio in the afternoon! Montessori's original program was actually a full-day program, so you should try looking up what she did. She goes into it in "The Montessori Method," but unfortunately that book was written early in her career and subsequent books are more accurate as to what she found worked best with experience.
post #7 of 9
Matt, I think your explanation was appropriate. I am not as familiar with Montessori as I am with Reggio, so I am coming at it from the opposite persepective. In my mind the two have more in common then they have in differences. One of the key differences though is that M appears to have a more defined curriculum then RE. In simple terms RE is a child lead, project based approach. While the teachers do have teaching goals, the manner and approach they take to accomplish them is fluid. Through observation of the children in the classroom (where the environment itself is considered a 'teacher') they incorporate their intended goals into the children's play with hands-on, interactive projects.

Another key difference is the intended age. RE was originally designed for babe's to 6 year olds'. Many people laugh at the thought of taking it beyond K.
post #8 of 9
I was going to ask for a comparison too from anyone who has experienced both.

I used to teach Middle School Spanish in an idependent school in WI and the lower school used the RE approach. I am continually impressed at the level of excitement, enthusiasm and love of learning expressed by the students.

I also love the approach of Montessori and have incorporated some of it into our home environment for our girls.

I am so torn as where to send them to school for kindergarten. I need to choose now if I want to get them into a charter school. I really wish that there was a school that used both. My girls love to play pretend - most of their play is just that. Tonight before bed they got out their Melissa & Doug wooden birthday cake set and set up their stuffed animals, distributed the pieces of cake, sang Happy Birthday...almost all of their play is pretend play. When we do our "preschool" time at home they already know their letters but enjoy the variety of ways I keep presenting it. They love to paint and create too.

I know Montessori can add a lot of depth and further their knowledge. I also know they like to break into a song or pretend to be a storyteller doing a puppet show. I am just so conflicted!!!!

Kristin
post #9 of 9

Childcare

Thanks for sharing your problems with us. If I could help you to solve your problem I'd recommend you to visit this website childcare. I'm sure you will get all the solution. I'm giving you this suggestion being a montessori school teacher.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Learning at School
This thread is locked  
Mothering › Forums › Education › Learning at School › Reggio Emilia and Montessori